Osage vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Community Comparison

COMPARE

Osage
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Osage

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar

Fair
Fair
3,726
SOCIAL INDEX
34.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
211th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,365
SOCIAL INDEX
31.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
222nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Integration in Osage Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 62,717,395 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar within Osage communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.008. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Osage within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.025% in Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Osage corresponds to an increase of 24.9 Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar.
Osage Integration in Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Communities

Osage vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Osage and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.1% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 18.5%), householder income under 25 years ($45,764 compared to $48,749, a difference of 6.5%), and median female earnings ($36,034 compared to $38,028, a difference of 5.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($50,292 compared to $50,298, a difference of 0.010%), per capita income ($39,568 compared to $39,827, a difference of 0.66%), and householder income over 65 years ($55,677 compared to $57,114, a difference of 2.6%).
Osage vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Income
Income MetricOsageImmigrants from Burma/Myanmar
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$39,568
Tragic
$39,827
Median Family Income
Tragic
$91,926
Tragic
$94,472
Median Household Income
Tragic
$75,240
Tragic
$78,682
Median Earnings
Tragic
$42,651
Tragic
$43,998
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$50,292
Tragic
$50,298
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$36,034
Tragic
$38,028
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$45,764
Tragic
$48,749
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$84,461
Tragic
$86,736
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$88,390
Tragic
$91,385
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$55,677
Tragic
$57,114
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.1%
Exceptional
22.8%

Osage vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Osage and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (16.5% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 25.5%), single father poverty (19.0% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 15.6%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.5% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 13.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 5 (19.6% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 3.6%), female poverty (14.8% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 3.8%), and poverty (13.6% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 4.8%).
Osage vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Poverty
Poverty MetricOsageImmigrants from Burma/Myanmar
Poverty
Tragic
13.6%
Tragic
14.2%
Families
Tragic
9.7%
Tragic
10.5%
Males
Tragic
12.3%
Tragic
13.0%
Females
Tragic
14.8%
Tragic
15.4%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
24.5%
Tragic
21.6%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
16.4%
Tragic
15.2%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
19.6%
Tragic
20.4%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
17.9%
Tragic
19.4%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
17.7%
Tragic
19.2%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
18.5%
Tragic
19.7%
Single Males
Tragic
16.5%
Poor
13.1%
Single Females
Tragic
24.4%
Tragic
22.6%
Single Fathers
Tragic
19.0%
Fair
16.5%
Single Mothers
Tragic
32.6%
Tragic
30.6%
Married Couples
Poor
5.4%
Tragic
6.0%
Seniors Over 65 years
Excellent
10.6%
Fair
11.3%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.4%
Good
12.1%
Receiving Food Stamps
Average
11.7%
Tragic
12.9%

Osage vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Osage and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.5% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 29.2%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 24.6%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 21.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.63%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.7% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 1.1%), and unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.5%).
Osage vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Unemployment
Unemployment MetricOsageImmigrants from Burma/Myanmar
Unemployment
Exceptional
5.0%
Excellent
5.1%
Males
Average
5.3%
Good
5.2%
Females
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
5.1%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.7%
Exceptional
10.6%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Average
17.6%
Exceptional
15.6%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.4%
Exceptional
9.1%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Average
6.7%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.3%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
4.9%
Good
4.6%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Fair
4.8%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.4%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.6%
Exceptional
4.6%
Seniors > 75
Fair
8.9%
Exceptional
7.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
9.5%
Exceptional
7.3%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Good
8.9%
Exceptional
7.5%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
5.7%
Good
5.4%

Osage vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Osage and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (63.5% compared to 66.3%, a difference of 4.5%), in labor force | age 30-34 (82.3% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 3.0%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.3% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (39.0% compared to 39.0%, a difference of 0.23%), in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.3% compared to 76.3%, a difference of 1.4%).
Osage vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricOsageImmigrants from Burma/Myanmar
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
63.5%
Exceptional
66.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
78.0%
Good
79.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
39.0%
Exceptional
39.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Good
75.3%
Exceptional
76.3%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
82.3%
Average
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
82.3%
Average
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
82.9%
Tragic
84.0%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
80.6%
Tragic
82.0%

Osage vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Osage and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.4% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 10.8%), divorced or separated (13.4% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 10.8%), and married-couple households (46.9% compared to 43.4%, a difference of 8.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.6% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 1.3%), family households (63.7% compared to 62.6%, a difference of 1.9%), and single father households (2.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 2.1%).
Osage vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Family Structure
Family Structure MetricOsageImmigrants from Burma/Myanmar
Family Households
Tragic
63.7%
Tragic
62.6%
Family Households with Children
Good
27.6%
Exceptional
28.0%
Married-couple Households
Good
46.9%
Tragic
43.4%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.18
Exceptional
3.29
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.5%
Poor
2.4%
Single Mother Households
Average
6.4%
Tragic
7.0%
Currently Married
Excellent
47.5%
Tragic
44.3%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.4%
Fair
12.1%
Births to Unmarried Women
Fair
32.1%
Poor
32.9%

Osage vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Osage and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 24.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 20.7%), and no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 19.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 89.7%, a difference of 1.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.8% compared to 53.9%, a difference of 9.0%), and no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 19.8%).
Osage vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricOsageImmigrants from Burma/Myanmar
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.7%
Average
10.4%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
91.4%
Average
89.7%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
58.8%
Tragic
53.9%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
22.7%
Poor
18.8%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.8%
Fair
6.2%

Osage vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Osage and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.8% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 79.1%), master's degree (12.6% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 7.5%), and bachelor's degree (33.0% compared to 35.5%, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, under 1 year (62.7% compared to 62.5%, a difference of 0.36%), nursery school (98.3% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.5%), and college, 1 year or more (55.8% compared to 56.6%, a difference of 1.5%).
Osage vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Education Level
Education Level MetricOsageImmigrants from Burma/Myanmar
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.8%
Tragic
3.1%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
96.9%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
96.8%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
96.8%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
96.7%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
96.6%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Tragic
96.3%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Tragic
96.1%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Tragic
95.7%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.7%
Tragic
94.5%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.4%
Tragic
94.1%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.5%
Tragic
93.1%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.2%
Tragic
91.8%
11th Grade
Good
92.7%
Tragic
90.4%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Fair
91.0%
Tragic
88.9%
High School Diploma
Average
89.1%
Tragic
86.7%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
84.8%
Tragic
83.0%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
62.7%
Tragic
62.5%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
55.8%
Tragic
56.6%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
41.5%
Tragic
43.7%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
33.0%
Tragic
35.5%
Master's Degree
Tragic
12.6%
Tragic
13.5%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.7%
Tragic
3.9%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.7%
Poor
1.7%

Osage vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Osage and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.8% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 62.1%), hearing disability (4.1% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 39.4%), and male disability (14.0% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 24.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.8% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 2.7%), disability age over 75 (49.8% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 4.0%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 4.1%).
Osage vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Disability
Disability MetricOsageImmigrants from Burma/Myanmar
Disability
Tragic
14.2%
Fair
11.8%
Males
Tragic
14.0%
Average
11.2%
Females
Tragic
14.3%
Poor
12.4%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.8%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.5%
Average
5.6%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
8.3%
Poor
6.8%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
14.5%
Tragic
12.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
27.5%
Poor
24.0%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
49.8%
Poor
47.9%
Vision
Tragic
2.7%
Fair
2.2%
Hearing
Tragic
4.1%
Good
2.9%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.8%
Tragic
18.2%
Ambulatory
Tragic
7.4%
Average
6.1%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Average
2.5%