Osage vs Indian (Asian) Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 89,557,345 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Indians (Asian) within Osage communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.414. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Osage within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.234% in Indians (Asian). To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Osage corresponds to an increase of 233.9 Indians (Asian).

When considering income, the most significant differences between Osage and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($84,461 compared to $119,496, a difference of 41.5%), median household income ($75,240 compared to $105,262, a difference of 39.9%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($88,390 compared to $122,343, a difference of 38.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.1% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 2.3%), householder income over 65 years ($55,677 compared to $70,238, a difference of 26.2%), and householder income under 25 years ($45,764 compared to $58,239, a difference of 27.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Osage and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (16.4% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 46.7%), single male poverty (16.5% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 46.3%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (19.6% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 46.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.6% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 5.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.4% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 11.9%), and married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 12.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Osage and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.5% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 50.5%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 23.5%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.7% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 16.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.6% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 1.5%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 2.0%), and unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Osage and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.0% compared to 31.9%, a difference of 22.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.3% compared to 71.9%, a difference of 4.8%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (82.3% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 2.2%), in labor force | age 20-64 (78.0% compared to 79.9%, a difference of 2.4%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.3% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Osage and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (13.4% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 31.9%), single father households (2.5% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 29.8%), and births to unmarried women (32.1% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 26.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.6% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 0.22%), currently married (47.5% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 1.0%), and average family size (3.18 compared to 3.24, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Osage and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 61.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 20.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 18.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 6.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.8% compared to 53.1%, a difference of 10.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 18.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Osage and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.7% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 76.3%), doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 75.4%), and master's degree (12.6% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 62.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.7% compared to 92.5%, a difference of 0.23%), high school diploma (89.1% compared to 89.6%, a difference of 0.51%), and 12th grade, no diploma (91.0% compared to 91.5%, a difference of 0.56%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Osage and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.8% compared to 1.0%, a difference of 82.4%), disability age 35 to 64 (14.5% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 63.7%), and hearing disability (4.1% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 51.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.8% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 5.4%), disability age over 75 (49.8% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 7.1%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 9.6%).