Osage vs Chilean Community Comparison
COMPARE
Osage
Chilean
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Osage
Chileans
3,726
SOCIAL INDEX
34.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
211th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,759
SOCIAL INDEX
85.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
51st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chilean Integration in Osage Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 70,800,858 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chileans within Osage communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.286. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Osage within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.091% in Chileans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Osage corresponds to an increase of 91.2 Chileans.
Osage vs Chilean Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Osage and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($88,390 compared to $106,611, a difference of 20.6%), median household income ($75,240 compared to $90,605, a difference of 20.4%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($84,461 compared to $99,900, a difference of 18.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.1% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 2.9%), median female earnings ($36,034 compared to $40,757, a difference of 13.1%), and median male earnings ($50,292 compared to $56,973, a difference of 13.3%).
Income Metric | Osage | Chilean |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $39,568 | Exceptional $46,459 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $91,926 | Exceptional $108,429 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $75,240 | Exceptional $90,605 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $42,651 | Exceptional $48,504 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $50,292 | Exceptional $56,973 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $36,034 | Exceptional $40,757 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $45,764 | Exceptional $53,185 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $84,461 | Exceptional $99,900 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $88,390 | Exceptional $106,611 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $55,677 | Exceptional $63,957 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.1% | Fair 26.3% |
Osage vs Chilean Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Osage and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (16.5% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 38.1%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (16.4% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 28.1%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.5% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 28.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.6% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 5.8%), receiving food stamps (11.7% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 6.9%), and married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 10.2%).
Poverty Metric | Osage | Chilean |
Poverty | Tragic 13.6% | Excellent 11.8% |
Families | Tragic 9.7% | Excellent 8.5% |
Males | Tragic 12.3% | Excellent 10.7% |
Females | Tragic 14.8% | Excellent 12.9% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 24.5% | Exceptional 19.1% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 16.4% | Exceptional 12.8% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 19.6% | Exceptional 15.6% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 17.9% | Exceptional 14.8% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 17.7% | Exceptional 15.0% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 18.5% | Exceptional 15.1% |
Single Males | Tragic 16.5% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Single Females | Tragic 24.4% | Exceptional 19.9% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 19.0% | Exceptional 15.7% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 32.6% | Exceptional 27.9% |
Married Couples | Poor 5.4% | Excellent 4.9% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Excellent 10.6% | Fair 11.2% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.4% | Poor 12.6% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Average 11.7% | Excellent 11.0% |
Osage vs Chilean Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Osage and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.5% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 31.9%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 22.0%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.7% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 12.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.6% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 0.040%), unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.20%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.9% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 0.87%).
Unemployment Metric | Osage | Chilean |
Unemployment | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Males | Average 5.3% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Females | Exceptional 4.9% | Excellent 5.1% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 10.7% | Exceptional 11.3% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Average 17.6% | Average 17.6% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.4% | Exceptional 10.0% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Average 6.7% | Excellent 6.5% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.3% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 4.9% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Fair 4.8% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.4% | Good 4.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Good 5.3% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.6% | Excellent 5.1% |
Seniors > 75 | Fair 8.9% | Exceptional 8.4% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 9.5% | Exceptional 7.2% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Good 8.9% | Excellent 8.8% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 5.7% | Good 5.3% |
Osage vs Chilean Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Osage and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.0% compared to 35.8%, a difference of 8.9%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.5% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 4.0%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (80.6% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.3% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 1.1%), in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.0% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 2.7%).
Labor Participation Metric | Osage | Chilean |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 63.5% | Exceptional 66.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 78.0% | Exceptional 80.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 39.0% | Poor 35.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Good 75.3% | Poor 74.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 82.3% | Excellent 85.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 82.3% | Excellent 84.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 82.9% | Exceptional 84.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 80.6% | Exceptional 83.4% |
Osage vs Chilean Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Osage and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (13.4% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 12.4%), single father households (2.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 11.6%), and births to unmarried women (32.1% compared to 30.7%, a difference of 4.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (47.5% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 1.0%), married-couple households (46.9% compared to 47.5%, a difference of 1.4%), and average family size (3.18 compared to 3.23, a difference of 1.6%).
Family Structure Metric | Osage | Chilean |
Family Households | Tragic 63.7% | Exceptional 65.2% |
Family Households with Children | Good 27.6% | Exceptional 28.1% |
Married-couple Households | Good 46.9% | Exceptional 47.5% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.18 | Average 3.23 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.5% | Exceptional 2.2% |
Single Mother Households | Average 6.4% | Good 6.1% |
Currently Married | Excellent 47.5% | Good 47.0% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 13.4% | Good 12.0% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Fair 32.1% | Good 30.7% |
Osage vs Chilean Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Osage and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 21.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 15.3%), and no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 13.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 1.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.8% compared to 56.1%, a difference of 4.8%), and no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 13.8%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Osage | Chilean |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.7% | Excellent 9.9% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 91.4% | Good 90.2% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 58.8% | Excellent 56.1% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.7% | Good 19.7% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.8% | Good 6.4% |
Osage vs Chilean Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Osage and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.7% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 42.1%), master's degree (12.6% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 34.8%), and doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 29.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.7% compared to 92.9%, a difference of 0.14%), nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.34%), and 10th grade (94.2% compared to 93.9%, a difference of 0.34%).
Education Level Metric | Osage | Chilean |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.8% | Good 2.0% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.3% | Average 98.0% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.3% | Average 98.0% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Average 97.9% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Average 97.9% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Average 97.8% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Average 97.5% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.8% | Average 97.3% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Average 97.1% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.7% | Average 96.0% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.4% | Average 95.7% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.5% | Good 95.0% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 94.2% | Good 93.9% |
11th Grade | Good 92.7% | Excellent 92.9% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Fair 91.0% | Excellent 91.7% |
High School Diploma | Average 89.1% | Good 89.6% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 84.8% | Excellent 86.6% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 62.7% | Exceptional 67.6% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 55.8% | Exceptional 62.0% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 41.5% | Exceptional 49.4% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 33.0% | Exceptional 41.2% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 12.6% | Exceptional 16.9% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.7% | Exceptional 5.3% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.7% | Exceptional 2.2% |
Osage vs Chilean Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Osage and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.1% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 42.7%), disability age under 5 (1.8% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 42.6%), and disability age 35 to 64 (14.5% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 41.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.8% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 4.4%), disability age over 75 (49.8% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 7.2%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 9.7%).
Disability Metric | Osage | Chilean |
Disability | Tragic 14.2% | Exceptional 11.1% |
Males | Tragic 14.0% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Females | Tragic 14.3% | Exceptional 11.5% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.8% | Poor 1.3% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.5% | Exceptional 5.4% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 8.3% | Exceptional 6.3% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 14.5% | Exceptional 10.2% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 27.5% | Exceptional 22.0% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 49.8% | Exceptional 46.5% |
Vision | Tragic 2.7% | Exceptional 2.1% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.1% | Excellent 2.9% |
Cognitive | Tragic 17.8% | Excellent 17.0% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 7.4% | Exceptional 5.7% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Exceptional 2.3% |