Osage vs Cuban Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 86,999,807 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Cubans within Osage communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.489. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Osage within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.019% in Cubans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Osage corresponds to a decrease of 19.5 Cubans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Osage and Cuban communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.1% compared to 23.3%, a difference of 16.4%), householder income over 65 years ($55,677 compared to $49,152, a difference of 13.3%), and householder income under 25 years ($45,764 compared to $50,655, a difference of 10.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($88,390 compared to $86,301, a difference of 2.4%), median household income ($75,240 compared to $73,392, a difference of 2.5%), and median female earnings ($36,034 compared to $34,942, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Osage and Cuban communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.4% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 57.7%), receiving food stamps (11.7% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 55.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.6% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 52.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male poverty (12.3% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 0.39%), child poverty under the age of 16 (17.9% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 0.53%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (17.7% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Osage and Cuban communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.5% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 35.4%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 24.5%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.4% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 19.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.060%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.10%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.7% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Osage and Cuban communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.0% compared to 31.8%, a difference of 22.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.3% compared to 72.5%, a difference of 3.9%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (80.6% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (63.5% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 1.1%), in labor force | age 25-29 (82.3% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.0% compared to 79.5%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Osage and Cuban communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (32.1% compared to 39.4%, a difference of 22.8%), single mother households (6.4% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 13.2%), and divorced or separated (13.4% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 7.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.6% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 1.8%), average family size (3.18 compared to 3.25, a difference of 2.3%), and married-couple households (46.9% compared to 45.4%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Osage and Cuban communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 30.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 17.7%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.8% compared to 56.3%, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 91.5%, a difference of 0.15%), no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 2.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.8% compared to 56.3%, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Osage and Cuban communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.8% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 43.2%), doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 20.5%), and professional degree (3.7% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 7.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.77%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.81%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.81%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Osage and Cuban communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.8% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 46.3%), disability age 18 to 34 (8.3% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 45.3%), and disability age 35 to 64 (14.5% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 44.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (49.8% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 5.0%), self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 6.5%), and cognitive disability (17.8% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 7.8%).