Osage vs Celtic Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 62,190,764 people shows a near-perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Celtics within Osage communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.939. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Osage within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.024% in Celtics. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Osage corresponds to an increase of 23.6 Celtics.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Osage and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($88,390 compared to $98,896, a difference of 11.9%), median household income ($75,240 compared to $83,193, a difference of 10.6%), and per capita income ($39,568 compared to $43,621, a difference of 10.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.1% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 0.73%), median female earnings ($36,034 compared to $38,283, a difference of 6.2%), and median earnings ($42,651 compared to $45,732, a difference of 7.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Osage and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 14.0%), single male poverty (16.5% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 13.8%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.5% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 13.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (19.0% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 3.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.4% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 3.3%), and single mother poverty (32.6% compared to 30.9%, a difference of 5.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Osage and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 17.8%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.5% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 14.3%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.7% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 12.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.6% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 0.060%), female unemployment (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.28%), and unemployment (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Osage and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.0% compared to 41.3%, a difference of 6.0%), in labor force | age 25-29 (82.3% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.3% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (63.5% compared to 63.8%, a difference of 0.57%), in labor force | age 20-64 (78.0% compared to 78.7%, a difference of 0.94%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Osage and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 6.2%), divorced or separated (13.4% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 3.8%), and family households with children (27.6% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.7% compared to 63.8%, a difference of 0.050%), currently married (47.5% compared to 47.8%, a difference of 0.71%), and married-couple households (46.9% compared to 47.3%, a difference of 0.93%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Osage and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 9.6%), no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 7.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 4.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (58.8% compared to 59.2%, a difference of 0.65%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 92.1%, a difference of 0.76%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 4.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Osage and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.7% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 18.7%), master's degree (12.6% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 17.4%), and doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 13.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.12%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.12%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.12%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Osage and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (27.5% compared to 24.2%, a difference of 13.3%), disability age 35 to 64 (14.5% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 12.8%), and vision disability (2.7% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 11.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 0.22%), cognitive disability (17.8% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 3.5%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.5% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 3.7%).