Osage vs Estonian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 52,812,292 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Estonians within Osage communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.864. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Osage within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.163% in Estonians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Osage corresponds to an increase of 162.9 Estonians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Osage and Estonian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($39,568 compared to $51,875, a difference of 31.1%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($88,390 compared to $114,220, a difference of 29.2%), and median family income ($91,926 compared to $118,013, a difference of 28.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.1% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 0.020%), householder income under 25 years ($45,764 compared to $51,523, a difference of 12.6%), and median female earnings ($36,034 compared to $43,106, a difference of 19.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Osage and Estonian communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (16.4% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 33.6%), child poverty under the age of 5 (19.6% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 32.6%), and married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 30.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.4% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 0.24%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.6% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 9.4%), and single father poverty (19.0% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 17.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Osage and Estonian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.5% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 34.1%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 19.4%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.7% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 12.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.18%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.7% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 0.41%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.46%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Osage and Estonian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 30-34 (82.3% compared to 85.9%, a difference of 4.5%), in labor force | age 25-29 (82.3% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 3.9%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (80.6% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.3% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 0.35%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.5% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.0% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Osage and Estonian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.5% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 18.7%), single mother households (6.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 18.5%), and divorced or separated (13.4% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 14.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.7% compared to 62.9%, a difference of 1.3%), currently married (47.5% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 1.5%), and married-couple households (46.9% compared to 47.7%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Osage and Estonian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 22.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 15.3%), and no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 12.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 90.3%, a difference of 1.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.8% compared to 56.6%, a difference of 3.8%), and no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 12.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Osage and Estonian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.7% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 61.0%), doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 52.4%), and master's degree (12.6% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 49.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.12%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.12%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.12%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Osage and Estonian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (14.5% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 36.3%), vision disability (2.7% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 29.9%), and disability age 65 to 74 (27.5% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 28.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.8% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 6.5%), self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 9.1%), and disability age over 75 (49.8% compared to 45.6%, a difference of 9.3%).