Osage vs Slovak Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 82,550,734 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Slovaks within Osage communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.548. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Osage within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.196% in Slovaks. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Osage corresponds to an increase of 196.2 Slovaks.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Osage and Slovak communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($88,390 compared to $101,029, a difference of 14.3%), median family income ($91,926 compared to $103,729, a difference of 12.8%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($84,461 compared to $95,032, a difference of 12.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($55,677 compared to $59,039, a difference of 6.0%), wage/income gap (27.1% compared to 28.9%, a difference of 6.7%), and median female earnings ($36,034 compared to $39,029, a difference of 8.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Osage and Slovak communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 35.3%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.5% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 25.6%), and family poverty (9.7% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 23.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (19.0% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 1.4%), single mother poverty (32.6% compared to 30.4%, a difference of 7.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.4% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 8.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Osage and Slovak communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.9% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 17.5%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.4% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 15.2%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.7% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 13.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.2%), male unemployment (5.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 2.1%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Osage and Slovak communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.0% compared to 42.6%, a difference of 9.4%), in labor force | age 25-29 (82.3% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 4.3%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (82.3% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 3.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (63.5% compared to 63.9%, a difference of 0.68%), in labor force | age 20-64 (78.0% compared to 79.8%, a difference of 2.3%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Osage and Slovak communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.4% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 10.9%), single father households (2.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 10.4%), and divorced or separated (13.4% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 10.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.7% compared to 63.3%, a difference of 0.68%), married-couple households (46.9% compared to 47.6%, a difference of 1.5%), and currently married (47.5% compared to 48.3%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Osage and Slovak communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 23.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 13.1%), and no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 5.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 0.55%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.8% compared to 58.0%, a difference of 1.4%), and no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 5.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Osage and Slovak communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.8% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 30.8%), master's degree (12.6% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 18.7%), and professional degree (3.7% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 15.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.40%), nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.41%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.41%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Osage and Slovak communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (27.5% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 21.9%), vision disability (2.7% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 21.0%), and disability age 35 to 64 (14.5% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 19.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (6.5% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 0.040%), self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 1.6%), and female disability (14.3% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 7.3%).