Osage vs White/Caucasian Community Comparison
COMPARE
Osage
White/Caucasian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Osage
Whites/Caucasians
3,726
SOCIAL INDEX
34.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
211th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
5,140
SOCIAL INDEX
48.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
185th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
White/Caucasian Integration in Osage Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 91,808,913 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Whites/Caucasians within Osage communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.356. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Osage within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.557% in Whites/Caucasians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Osage corresponds to a decrease of 556.8 Whites/Caucasians.
Osage vs White/Caucasian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Osage and White/Caucasian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($88,390 compared to $98,091, a difference of 11.0%), householder income under 25 years ($45,764 compared to $50,336, a difference of 10.0%), and median household income ($75,240 compared to $82,029, a difference of 9.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($36,034 compared to $37,531, a difference of 4.2%), wage/income gap (27.1% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 5.3%), and householder income over 65 years ($55,677 compared to $58,847, a difference of 5.7%).
Income Metric | Osage | White/Caucasian |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $39,568 | Poor $42,180 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $91,926 | Poor $99,800 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $75,240 | Poor $82,029 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $42,651 | Poor $45,197 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $50,292 | Fair $53,925 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $36,034 | Tragic $37,531 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $45,764 | Tragic $50,336 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $84,461 | Poor $91,668 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $88,390 | Fair $98,091 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $55,677 | Tragic $58,847 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.1% | Tragic 28.5% |
Osage vs White/Caucasian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Osage and White/Caucasian communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.5% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 17.7%), single male poverty (16.5% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 13.7%), and married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 12.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.4% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 0.44%), single father poverty (19.0% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 3.7%), and single mother poverty (32.6% compared to 31.2%, a difference of 4.6%).
Poverty Metric | Osage | White/Caucasian |
Poverty | Tragic 13.6% | Average 12.3% |
Families | Tragic 9.7% | Good 8.8% |
Males | Tragic 12.3% | Average 11.1% |
Females | Tragic 14.8% | Average 13.4% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 24.5% | Tragic 20.8% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 16.4% | Tragic 14.7% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 19.6% | Poor 18.1% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 17.9% | Average 16.2% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 17.7% | Average 16.5% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 18.5% | Average 16.6% |
Single Males | Tragic 16.5% | Tragic 14.5% |
Single Females | Tragic 24.4% | Tragic 22.7% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 19.0% | Tragic 18.4% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 32.6% | Tragic 31.2% |
Married Couples | Poor 5.4% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Excellent 10.6% | Exceptional 10.0% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.4% | Exceptional 11.4% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Average 11.7% | Excellent 11.1% |
Osage vs White/Caucasian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Osage and White/Caucasian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.4% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 14.1%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.7% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 13.5%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.9% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 13.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.0%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 2.8%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 2.9%).
Unemployment Metric | Osage | White/Caucasian |
Unemployment | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Males | Average 5.3% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Females | Exceptional 4.9% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 10.7% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Average 17.6% | Exceptional 16.8% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.4% | Excellent 10.1% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Average 6.7% | Poor 6.9% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.3% | Tragic 5.7% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 4.9% | Good 4.6% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Fair 4.8% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.4% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Average 5.4% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.6% | Excellent 5.1% |
Seniors > 75 | Fair 8.9% | Tragic 10.1% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 9.5% | Tragic 8.4% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Good 8.9% | Tragic 9.6% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 5.7% | Excellent 5.3% |
Osage vs White/Caucasian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Osage and White/Caucasian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.0% compared to 41.3%, a difference of 6.0%), in labor force | age 25-29 (82.3% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 2.3%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.3% compared to 76.9%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (63.5% compared to 63.6%, a difference of 0.19%), in labor force | age 20-64 (78.0% compared to 78.5%, a difference of 0.70%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 0.83%).
Labor Participation Metric | Osage | White/Caucasian |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 63.5% | Tragic 63.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 78.0% | Tragic 78.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 39.0% | Exceptional 41.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Good 75.3% | Exceptional 76.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 82.3% | Tragic 84.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 82.3% | Tragic 83.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 82.9% | Tragic 83.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 80.6% | Tragic 81.9% |
Osage vs White/Caucasian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Osage and White/Caucasian communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (13.4% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 6.6%), single mother households (6.4% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 4.1%), and births to unmarried women (32.1% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 3.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.6% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 0.73%), average family size (3.18 compared to 3.14, a difference of 1.1%), and family households (63.7% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 2.1%).
Family Structure Metric | Osage | White/Caucasian |
Family Households | Tragic 63.7% | Exceptional 65.1% |
Family Households with Children | Good 27.6% | Average 27.4% |
Married-couple Households | Good 46.9% | Exceptional 48.6% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.18 | Tragic 3.14 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.5% | Fair 2.4% |
Single Mother Households | Average 6.4% | Good 6.1% |
Currently Married | Excellent 47.5% | Exceptional 48.6% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 13.4% | Tragic 12.6% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Fair 32.1% | Poor 33.3% |
Osage vs White/Caucasian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Osage and White/Caucasian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 23.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 5.5%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.8% compared to 60.8%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 0.61%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 93.1%, a difference of 1.9%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.8% compared to 60.8%, a difference of 3.5%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Osage | White/Caucasian |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.7% | Exceptional 7.0% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 91.4% | Exceptional 93.1% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 58.8% | Exceptional 60.8% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.7% | Exceptional 22.6% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.8% | Exceptional 7.4% |
Osage vs White/Caucasian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Osage and White/Caucasian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.7% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 10.1%), master's degree (12.6% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 10.0%), and no schooling completed (1.8% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.12%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.12%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.12%).
Education Level Metric | Osage | White/Caucasian |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.8% | Exceptional 1.6% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.5% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.4% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.4% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.4% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.3% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Exceptional 98.1% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.8% | Exceptional 97.9% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Exceptional 97.7% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.7% | Exceptional 97.0% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.4% | Exceptional 96.7% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.5% | Exceptional 95.8% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 94.2% | Exceptional 94.7% |
11th Grade | Good 92.7% | Exceptional 93.3% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Fair 91.0% | Exceptional 91.8% |
High School Diploma | Average 89.1% | Exceptional 90.1% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 84.8% | Good 86.2% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 62.7% | Poor 64.0% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 55.8% | Tragic 57.6% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 41.5% | Tragic 44.2% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 33.0% | Tragic 35.3% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 12.6% | Tragic 13.8% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.7% | Poor 4.1% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.7% | Fair 1.8% |
Osage vs White/Caucasian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Osage and White/Caucasian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (14.5% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 14.8%), disability age 65 to 74 (27.5% compared to 24.2%, a difference of 13.3%), and vision disability (2.7% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 12.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 0.24%), cognitive disability (17.8% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 4.6%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.5% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 5.1%).
Disability Metric | Osage | White/Caucasian |
Disability | Tragic 14.2% | Tragic 13.0% |
Males | Tragic 14.0% | Tragic 12.8% |
Females | Tragic 14.3% | Tragic 13.2% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.8% | Tragic 1.7% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.5% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 8.3% | Tragic 7.6% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 14.5% | Tragic 12.6% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 27.5% | Tragic 24.2% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 49.8% | Average 47.3% |
Vision | Tragic 2.7% | Tragic 2.4% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.1% | Tragic 3.7% |
Cognitive | Tragic 17.8% | Exceptional 17.0% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 7.4% | Tragic 6.7% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Tragic 2.6% |