Guatemalan vs Tsimshian Community Comparison
COMPARE
Guatemalan
Tsimshian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Guatemalans
Tsimshian
1,497
SOCIAL INDEX
12.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
305th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
4,927
SOCIAL INDEX
46.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
189th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Tsimshian Integration in Guatemalan Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 14,609,179 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Tsimshian within Guatemalan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.652. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Guatemalans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.025% in Tsimshian. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Guatemalans corresponds to an increase of 25.1 Tsimshian.
Guatemalan vs Tsimshian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,331 compared to $97,809, a difference of 18.8%), median family income ($88,295 compared to $101,543, a difference of 15.0%), and median female earnings ($35,695 compared to $39,530, a difference of 10.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($46,736 compared to $48,836, a difference of 4.5%), wage/income gap (22.6% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 5.6%), and median earnings ($41,205 compared to $43,695, a difference of 6.0%).
Income Metric | Guatemalan | Tsimshian |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $37,766 | Tragic $40,344 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $88,295 | Fair $101,543 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $75,961 | Fair $83,346 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $41,205 | Tragic $43,695 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $46,736 | Tragic $48,836 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $35,695 | Average $39,530 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Poor $51,525 | Exceptional $54,649 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $82,331 | Excellent $97,809 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $87,705 | Poor $96,783 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $54,526 | Tragic $58,202 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 22.6% | Exceptional 23.9% |
Guatemalan vs Tsimshian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among girls under 16 (21.4% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 86.5%), child poverty under the age of 16 (21.2% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 50.3%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (21.6% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 46.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.7% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 2.5%), male poverty (13.8% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 7.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (14.8% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 8.7%).
Poverty Metric | Guatemalan | Tsimshian |
Poverty | Tragic 15.3% | Tragic 13.0% |
Families | Tragic 11.7% | Good 8.8% |
Males | Tragic 13.8% | Tragic 12.8% |
Females | Tragic 16.7% | Good 13.1% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 20.7% | Tragic 21.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 16.4% | Exceptional 12.7% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 21.6% | Exceptional 14.7% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 21.2% | Exceptional 14.1% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 21.1% | Average 16.4% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 21.4% | Exceptional 11.5% |
Single Males | Tragic 13.8% | Exceptional 11.1% |
Single Females | Tragic 23.8% | Exceptional 19.1% |
Single Fathers | Poor 16.6% | Exceptional 12.7% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 32.9% | Exceptional 26.8% |
Married Couples | Tragic 7.0% | Tragic 5.9% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 13.5% | Good 10.8% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 14.8% | Tragic 16.1% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 14.4% | Tragic 15.7% |
Guatemalan vs Tsimshian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.0% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 130.0%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.5% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 71.3%), and male unemployment (5.6% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 50.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.9%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.6% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 7.2%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.9% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 9.0%).
Unemployment Metric | Guatemalan | Tsimshian |
Unemployment | Tragic 5.8% | Tragic 7.2% |
Males | Tragic 5.6% | Tragic 8.5% |
Females | Tragic 6.0% | Fair 5.4% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 12.1% | Tragic 16.5% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 18.6% | Good 17.3% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Poor 10.5% | Tragic 18.0% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.1% | Tragic 8.0% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.0% | Tragic 13.8% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.1% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 4.9% | Good 4.5% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.3% | Tragic 5.2% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.2% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.8% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.6% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Seniors > 75 | Fair 8.8% | Tragic 10.5% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 8.7% | Exceptional 6.6% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.3% | Tragic 11.4% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 6.3% | Poor 5.6% |
Guatemalan vs Tsimshian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 25-29 (83.7% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 6.0%), in labor force | age 16-19 (35.5% compared to 37.4%, a difference of 5.3%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.2% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 4.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (78.7% compared to 78.7%, a difference of 0.040%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.0% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 0.68%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 1.7%).
Labor Participation Metric | Guatemalan | Tsimshian |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 65.6% | Tragic 64.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 78.7% | Tragic 78.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 35.5% | Excellent 37.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Good 75.3% | Tragic 72.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 83.7% | Exceptional 88.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 83.7% | Exceptional 85.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 83.0% | Tragic 83.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 81.2% | Tragic 77.4% |
Guatemalan vs Tsimshian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.7% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 27.6%), births to unmarried women (37.1% compared to 42.2%, a difference of 13.6%), and married-couple households (43.3% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 12.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (3.0% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 2.6%), family households (65.2% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 2.9%), and average family size (3.40 compared to 3.25, a difference of 4.8%).
Family Structure Metric | Guatemalan | Tsimshian |
Family Households | Exceptional 65.2% | Exceptional 67.1% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.9% | Tragic 27.0% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 43.3% | Exceptional 48.7% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.40 | Excellent 3.25 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 3.0% | Tragic 2.9% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.7% | Excellent 6.0% |
Currently Married | Tragic 42.9% | Exceptional 47.7% |
Divorced or Separated | Fair 12.2% | Tragic 13.3% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 37.1% | Tragic 42.2% |
Guatemalan vs Tsimshian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 27.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 12.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 5.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 2.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.1% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 4.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 5.2%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Guatemalan | Tsimshian |
No Vehicles Available | Poor 11.0% | Exceptional 8.6% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Poor 89.2% | Exceptional 91.4% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 54.1% | Exceptional 56.7% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 20.1% | Fair 19.1% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.0% | Fair 6.2% |
Guatemalan vs Tsimshian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.5% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 108.8%), college, under 1 year (56.8% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 13.2%), and college, 1 year or more (51.2% compared to 57.9%, a difference of 13.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of associate's degree (38.5% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 0.24%), doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 0.45%), and nursery school (96.6% compared to 98.9%, a difference of 2.4%).
Education Level Metric | Guatemalan | Tsimshian |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 3.5% | Exceptional 1.7% |
Nursery School | Tragic 96.6% | Exceptional 98.9% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 96.5% | Exceptional 98.8% |
1st Grade | Tragic 96.5% | Exceptional 98.8% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 96.3% | Exceptional 98.8% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 96.0% | Exceptional 98.8% |
4th Grade | Tragic 95.3% | Exceptional 98.6% |
5th Grade | Tragic 94.8% | Exceptional 98.4% |
6th Grade | Tragic 94.2% | Exceptional 98.3% |
7th Grade | Tragic 91.7% | Exceptional 97.8% |
8th Grade | Tragic 91.1% | Exceptional 99.0% |
9th Grade | Tragic 89.9% | Exceptional 97.0% |
10th Grade | Tragic 87.9% | Exceptional 95.6% |
11th Grade | Tragic 86.4% | Exceptional 94.4% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 84.6% | Exceptional 92.9% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 82.0% | Exceptional 91.3% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 78.5% | Excellent 86.6% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 56.8% | Poor 64.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 51.2% | Poor 57.9% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 38.5% | Tragic 38.6% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 31.0% | Tragic 28.8% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.7% | Tragic 11.4% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.5% | Tragic 3.2% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.4% | Tragic 1.4% |
Guatemalan vs Tsimshian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 96.8%), hearing disability (2.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 67.3%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 44.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 2.4%), cognitive disability (17.8% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 2.7%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.4% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 16.3%).
Disability Metric | Guatemalan | Tsimshian |
Disability | Good 11.6% | Tragic 16.1% |
Males | Good 11.1% | Tragic 15.6% |
Females | Good 12.1% | Tragic 16.8% |
Age | Under 5 years | Good 1.2% | Tragic 2.4% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Excellent 5.5% | Tragic 7.9% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Excellent 6.4% | Tragic 7.4% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Poor 11.7% | Tragic 16.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 25.5% | Tragic 32.9% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 49.0% | Tragic 59.2% |
Vision | Tragic 2.3% | Tragic 3.2% |
Hearing | Exceptional 2.8% | Tragic 4.7% |
Cognitive | Tragic 17.8% | Average 17.3% |
Ambulatory | Fair 6.2% | Tragic 8.8% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Tragic 2.6% |