Ghanaian vs Tsimshian Community Comparison
COMPARE
Ghanaian
Tsimshian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Ghanaians
Tsimshian
2,403
SOCIAL INDEX
21.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
261st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
4,927
SOCIAL INDEX
46.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
189th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Tsimshian Integration in Ghanaian Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 11,589,886 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Tsimshian within Ghanaian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.545. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ghanaians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.422% in Tsimshian. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ghanaians corresponds to an increase of 421.5 Tsimshian.
Ghanaian vs Tsimshian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Ghanaian and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($90,137 compared to $97,809, a difference of 8.5%), median male earnings ($52,810 compared to $48,836, a difference of 8.1%), and wage/income gap (22.3% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 6.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median household income ($83,582 compared to $83,346, a difference of 0.28%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($97,277 compared to $96,783, a difference of 0.51%), and median female earnings ($40,429 compared to $39,530, a difference of 2.3%).
Income Metric | Ghanaian | Tsimshian |
Per Capita Income | Poor $42,164 | Tragic $40,344 |
Median Family Income | Poor $98,877 | Fair $101,543 |
Median Household Income | Fair $83,582 | Fair $83,346 |
Median Earnings | Average $46,440 | Tragic $43,695 |
Median Male Earnings | Poor $52,810 | Tragic $48,836 |
Median Female Earnings | Excellent $40,429 | Average $39,530 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Good $52,594 | Exceptional $54,649 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $90,137 | Excellent $97,809 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Poor $97,277 | Poor $96,783 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Fair $60,043 | Tragic $58,202 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 22.3% | Exceptional 23.9% |
Ghanaian vs Tsimshian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ghanaian and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among girls under 16 (18.5% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 61.1%), child poverty under the age of 16 (18.6% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 31.8%), and single father poverty (16.7% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 31.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male poverty (12.7% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 0.95%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.8% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 2.2%), and married-couple family poverty (5.7% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 2.8%).
Poverty Metric | Ghanaian | Tsimshian |
Poverty | Tragic 13.9% | Tragic 13.0% |
Families | Tragic 10.3% | Good 8.8% |
Males | Tragic 12.7% | Tragic 12.8% |
Females | Tragic 14.7% | Good 13.1% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 20.8% | Tragic 21.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 14.4% | Exceptional 12.7% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 19.2% | Exceptional 14.7% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 18.6% | Exceptional 14.1% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 18.9% | Average 16.4% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 18.5% | Exceptional 11.5% |
Single Males | Tragic 13.3% | Exceptional 11.1% |
Single Females | Poor 21.6% | Exceptional 19.1% |
Single Fathers | Poor 16.7% | Exceptional 12.7% |
Single Mothers | Fair 29.4% | Exceptional 26.8% |
Married Couples | Tragic 5.7% | Tragic 5.9% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 12.4% | Good 10.8% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 14.0% | Tragic 16.1% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 14.0% | Tragic 15.7% |
Ghanaian vs Tsimshian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ghanaian and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.0% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 129.0%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (11.7% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 53.2%), and male unemployment (6.1% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 38.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 2.2%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.2% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 10.0%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.9% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 10.4%).
Unemployment Metric | Ghanaian | Tsimshian |
Unemployment | Tragic 6.0% | Tragic 7.2% |
Males | Tragic 6.1% | Tragic 8.5% |
Females | Tragic 5.9% | Fair 5.4% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 13.3% | Tragic 16.5% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 19.8% | Good 17.3% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 11.7% | Tragic 18.0% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.2% | Tragic 8.0% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.0% | Tragic 13.8% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.3% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 4.9% | Good 4.5% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.3% | Tragic 5.2% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.0% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.6% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.4% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 8.4% | Tragic 10.5% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 8.2% | Exceptional 6.6% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.6% | Tragic 11.4% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 6.2% | Poor 5.6% |
Ghanaian vs Tsimshian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ghanaian and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (83.0% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 7.2%), in labor force | age 16-19 (35.3% compared to 37.4%, a difference of 5.7%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 4.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 0.48%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 1.6%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 78.7%, a difference of 1.8%).
Labor Participation Metric | Ghanaian | Tsimshian |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 67.1% | Tragic 64.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.1% | Tragic 78.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 35.3% | Excellent 37.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 74.3% | Tragic 72.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Average 84.7% | Exceptional 88.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.4% | Exceptional 85.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 84.8% | Tragic 83.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Good 83.0% | Tragic 77.4% |
Ghanaian vs Tsimshian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ghanaian and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.8% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 30.6%), births to unmarried women (34.3% compared to 42.2%, a difference of 23.1%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 19.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.29 compared to 3.25, a difference of 1.1%), family households with children (28.5% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 5.5%), and family households (63.5% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 5.7%).
Family Structure Metric | Ghanaian | Tsimshian |
Family Households | Tragic 63.5% | Exceptional 67.1% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.5% | Tragic 27.0% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 42.2% | Exceptional 48.7% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.29 | Excellent 3.25 |
Single Father Households | Poor 2.4% | Tragic 2.9% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.8% | Excellent 6.0% |
Currently Married | Tragic 42.9% | Exceptional 47.7% |
Divorced or Separated | Average 12.1% | Tragic 13.3% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 34.3% | Tragic 42.2% |
Ghanaian vs Tsimshian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ghanaian and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (16.4% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 91.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (48.0% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 18.1%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (5.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 17.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (83.6% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 9.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (16.4% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 16.7%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (5.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 17.4%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Ghanaian | Tsimshian |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 16.4% | Exceptional 8.6% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 83.6% | Exceptional 91.4% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 48.0% | Exceptional 56.7% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 16.4% | Fair 19.1% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 5.2% | Fair 6.2% |
Ghanaian vs Tsimshian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ghanaian and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.6% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 54.4%), master's degree (15.5% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 36.2%), and professional degree (4.3% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 33.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, under 1 year (63.9% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 0.61%), college, 1 year or more (58.4% compared to 57.9%, a difference of 0.72%), and nursery school (97.5% compared to 98.9%, a difference of 1.4%).
Education Level Metric | Ghanaian | Tsimshian |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 2.6% | Exceptional 1.7% |
Nursery School | Tragic 97.5% | Exceptional 98.9% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 97.4% | Exceptional 98.8% |
1st Grade | Tragic 97.4% | Exceptional 98.8% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 97.4% | Exceptional 98.8% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 97.2% | Exceptional 98.8% |
4th Grade | Tragic 97.0% | Exceptional 98.6% |
5th Grade | Tragic 96.7% | Exceptional 98.4% |
6th Grade | Tragic 96.4% | Exceptional 98.3% |
7th Grade | Tragic 95.3% | Exceptional 97.8% |
8th Grade | Tragic 94.9% | Exceptional 99.0% |
9th Grade | Tragic 93.9% | Exceptional 97.0% |
10th Grade | Tragic 92.8% | Exceptional 95.6% |
11th Grade | Tragic 91.5% | Exceptional 94.4% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.0% | Exceptional 92.9% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 87.7% | Exceptional 91.3% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 84.3% | Excellent 86.6% |
College, Under 1 year | Poor 63.9% | Poor 64.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Fair 58.4% | Poor 57.9% |
Associate's Degree | Fair 45.8% | Tragic 38.6% |
Bachelor's Degree | Average 38.0% | Tragic 28.8% |
Master's Degree | Good 15.5% | Tragic 11.4% |
Professional Degree | Fair 4.3% | Tragic 3.2% |
Doctorate Degree | Average 1.8% | Tragic 1.4% |
Ghanaian vs Tsimshian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ghanaian and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 99.6%), hearing disability (2.5% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 84.5%), and ambulatory disability (6.0% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 45.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.3% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 5.7%), self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 6.3%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.6% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 12.4%).
Disability Metric | Ghanaian | Tsimshian |
Disability | Excellent 11.5% | Tragic 16.1% |
Males | Exceptional 10.8% | Tragic 15.6% |
Females | Good 12.1% | Tragic 16.8% |
Age | Under 5 years | Good 1.2% | Tragic 2.4% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 5.8% | Tragic 7.9% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Average 6.6% | Tragic 7.4% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Poor 11.7% | Tragic 16.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Poor 24.1% | Tragic 32.9% |
Age | Over 75 years | Fair 47.5% | Tragic 59.2% |
Vision | Fair 2.2% | Tragic 3.2% |
Hearing | Exceptional 2.5% | Tragic 4.7% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.3% | Average 17.3% |
Ambulatory | Good 6.0% | Tragic 8.8% |
Self-Care | Average 2.5% | Tragic 2.6% |