Immigrants from Laos vs Tsimshian Community Comparison
COMPARE
Immigrants from Laos
Tsimshian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Immigrants from Laos
Tsimshian
2,709
SOCIAL INDEX
24.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
242nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
4,927
SOCIAL INDEX
46.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
189th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Tsimshian Integration in Immigrants from Laos Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 13,386,293 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Tsimshian within Immigrant from Laos communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.496. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Laos within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.068% in Tsimshian. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Laos corresponds to an increase of 68.3 Tsimshian.
Immigrants from Laos vs Tsimshian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($85,553 compared to $97,809, a difference of 14.3%), median family income ($92,239 compared to $101,543, a difference of 10.1%), and householder income under 25 years ($50,041 compared to $54,649, a difference of 9.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (23.8% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 0.23%), median male earnings ($49,190 compared to $48,836, a difference of 0.73%), and median earnings ($42,884 compared to $43,695, a difference of 1.9%).
Income Metric | Immigrants from Laos | Tsimshian |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $37,857 | Tragic $40,344 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $92,239 | Fair $101,543 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $78,327 | Fair $83,346 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $42,884 | Tragic $43,695 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $49,190 | Tragic $48,836 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $36,841 | Average $39,530 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $50,041 | Exceptional $54,649 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $85,553 | Excellent $97,809 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $90,909 | Poor $96,783 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $56,722 | Tragic $58,202 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 23.8% | Exceptional 23.9% |
Immigrants from Laos vs Tsimshian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among girls under 16 (18.9% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 64.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.0% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 34.4%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (18.7% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 32.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male poverty (12.6% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 1.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.1% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 2.7%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.6% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 2.8%).
Poverty Metric | Immigrants from Laos | Tsimshian |
Poverty | Tragic 13.8% | Tragic 13.0% |
Families | Tragic 10.2% | Good 8.8% |
Males | Tragic 12.6% | Tragic 12.8% |
Females | Tragic 15.0% | Good 13.1% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 20.6% | Tragic 21.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 15.2% | Exceptional 12.7% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 19.4% | Exceptional 14.7% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 18.7% | Exceptional 14.1% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 18.7% | Average 16.4% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 18.9% | Exceptional 11.5% |
Single Males | Fair 13.0% | Exceptional 11.1% |
Single Females | Tragic 22.9% | Exceptional 19.1% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.1% | Exceptional 12.7% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 30.6% | Exceptional 26.8% |
Married Couples | Tragic 5.7% | Tragic 5.9% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Fair 11.1% | Good 10.8% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Good 12.0% | Tragic 16.1% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.8% | Tragic 15.7% |
Immigrants from Laos vs Tsimshian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.5% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 152.1%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.9% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 81.6%), and male unemployment (5.4% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 55.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.1% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 1.1%), female unemployment (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.7%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.6% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 2.0%).
Unemployment Metric | Immigrants from Laos | Tsimshian |
Unemployment | Fair 5.3% | Tragic 7.2% |
Males | Poor 5.4% | Tragic 8.5% |
Females | Average 5.3% | Fair 5.4% |
Youth < 25 | Good 11.5% | Tragic 16.5% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Excellent 17.1% | Good 17.3% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.9% | Tragic 18.0% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Good 6.6% | Tragic 8.0% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Average 5.5% | Tragic 13.8% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Fair 4.7% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Fair 4.6% | Good 4.5% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 5.2% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.6% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Good 5.3% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Seniors > 65 | Good 5.1% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Seniors > 75 | Fair 8.9% | Tragic 10.5% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Average 7.6% | Exceptional 6.6% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.2% | Tragic 11.4% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Fair 5.5% | Poor 5.6% |
Immigrants from Laos vs Tsimshian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.6% compared to 37.4%, a difference of 8.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 72.3%, a difference of 7.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.6% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 5.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (83.8% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 0.32%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.4% compared to 78.7%, a difference of 0.87%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.2% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 2.0%).
Labor Participation Metric | Immigrants from Laos | Tsimshian |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 66.0% | Tragic 64.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Fair 79.4% | Tragic 78.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 40.6% | Excellent 37.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 77.4% | Tragic 72.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Good 84.8% | Exceptional 88.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 84.2% | Exceptional 85.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 83.8% | Tragic 83.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 81.6% | Tragic 77.4% |
Immigrants from Laos vs Tsimshian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.7% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 27.5%), births to unmarried women (34.0% compared to 42.2%, a difference of 24.0%), and family households with children (29.8% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 10.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (2.9% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 1.1%), family households (65.3% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 2.7%), and average family size (3.34 compared to 3.25, a difference of 2.7%).
Family Structure Metric | Immigrants from Laos | Tsimshian |
Family Households | Exceptional 65.3% | Exceptional 67.1% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 29.8% | Tragic 27.0% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 45.1% | Exceptional 48.7% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.34 | Excellent 3.25 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.9% | Tragic 2.9% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.7% | Excellent 6.0% |
Currently Married | Tragic 45.0% | Exceptional 47.7% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 12.4% | Tragic 13.3% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 34.0% | Tragic 42.2% |
Immigrants from Laos vs Tsimshian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 25.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.4% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 17.3%), and no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.8% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 0.45%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.2% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 4.4%), and no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 5.1%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Immigrants from Laos | Tsimshian |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.2% | Exceptional 8.6% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 91.8% | Exceptional 91.4% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 59.2% | Exceptional 56.7% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.4% | Fair 19.1% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.7% | Fair 6.2% |
Immigrants from Laos vs Tsimshian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.1% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 90.0%), bachelor's degree (31.6% compared to 28.8%, a difference of 9.9%), and college, 1 year or more (54.7% compared to 57.9%, a difference of 6.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of master's degree (11.4% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 0.33%), professional degree (3.2% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 2.0%), and nursery school (96.9% compared to 98.9%, a difference of 2.1%).
Education Level Metric | Immigrants from Laos | Tsimshian |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 3.1% | Exceptional 1.7% |
Nursery School | Tragic 96.9% | Exceptional 98.9% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 96.9% | Exceptional 98.8% |
1st Grade | Tragic 96.8% | Exceptional 98.8% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 96.7% | Exceptional 98.8% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 96.6% | Exceptional 98.8% |
4th Grade | Tragic 96.3% | Exceptional 98.6% |
5th Grade | Tragic 96.0% | Exceptional 98.4% |
6th Grade | Tragic 95.7% | Exceptional 98.3% |
7th Grade | Tragic 94.5% | Exceptional 97.8% |
8th Grade | Tragic 94.1% | Exceptional 99.0% |
9th Grade | Tragic 93.2% | Exceptional 97.0% |
10th Grade | Tragic 91.9% | Exceptional 95.6% |
11th Grade | Tragic 90.5% | Exceptional 94.4% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 88.9% | Exceptional 92.9% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 86.6% | Exceptional 91.3% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 82.7% | Excellent 86.6% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 61.3% | Poor 64.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 54.7% | Poor 57.9% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 40.7% | Tragic 38.6% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 31.6% | Tragic 28.8% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.4% | Tragic 11.4% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.2% | Tragic 3.2% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.4% | Tragic 1.4% |
Immigrants from Laos vs Tsimshian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 91.9%), hearing disability (3.2% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 47.9%), and ambulatory disability (6.3% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 40.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 1.5%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.2% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 2.2%), and cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 4.5%).
Disability Metric | Immigrants from Laos | Tsimshian |
Disability | Tragic 12.4% | Tragic 16.1% |
Males | Tragic 11.9% | Tragic 15.6% |
Females | Tragic 12.8% | Tragic 16.8% |
Age | Under 5 years | Fair 1.3% | Tragic 2.4% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 5.8% | Tragic 7.9% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.2% | Tragic 7.4% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 13.0% | Tragic 16.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 26.1% | Tragic 32.9% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 49.2% | Tragic 59.2% |
Vision | Tragic 2.4% | Tragic 3.2% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.2% | Tragic 4.7% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.1% | Average 17.3% |
Ambulatory | Poor 6.3% | Tragic 8.8% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.7% | Tragic 2.6% |