Immigrants from Laos vs Tsimshian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Laos
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Tsimshian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Laos

Tsimshian

Fair
Average
2,709
SOCIAL INDEX
24.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
242nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
4,927
SOCIAL INDEX
46.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
189th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Tsimshian Integration in Immigrants from Laos Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 13,386,293 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Tsimshian within Immigrant from Laos communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.496. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Laos within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.068% in Tsimshian. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Laos corresponds to an increase of 68.3 Tsimshian.
Immigrants from Laos Integration in Tsimshian Communities

Immigrants from Laos vs Tsimshian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($85,553 compared to $97,809, a difference of 14.3%), median family income ($92,239 compared to $101,543, a difference of 10.1%), and householder income under 25 years ($50,041 compared to $54,649, a difference of 9.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (23.8% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 0.23%), median male earnings ($49,190 compared to $48,836, a difference of 0.73%), and median earnings ($42,884 compared to $43,695, a difference of 1.9%).
Immigrants from Laos vs Tsimshian Income
Income MetricImmigrants from LaosTsimshian
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$37,857
Tragic
$40,344
Median Family Income
Tragic
$92,239
Fair
$101,543
Median Household Income
Tragic
$78,327
Fair
$83,346
Median Earnings
Tragic
$42,884
Tragic
$43,695
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$49,190
Tragic
$48,836
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$36,841
Average
$39,530
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$50,041
Exceptional
$54,649
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$85,553
Excellent
$97,809
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$90,909
Poor
$96,783
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$56,722
Tragic
$58,202
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
23.8%
Exceptional
23.9%

Immigrants from Laos vs Tsimshian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among girls under 16 (18.9% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 64.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.0% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 34.4%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (18.7% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 32.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male poverty (12.6% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 1.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.1% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 2.7%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.6% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 2.8%).
Immigrants from Laos vs Tsimshian Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from LaosTsimshian
Poverty
Tragic
13.8%
Tragic
13.0%
Families
Tragic
10.2%
Good
8.8%
Males
Tragic
12.6%
Tragic
12.8%
Females
Tragic
15.0%
Good
13.1%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
20.6%
Tragic
21.2%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
15.2%
Exceptional
12.7%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
19.4%
Exceptional
14.7%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
18.7%
Exceptional
14.1%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
18.7%
Average
16.4%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
18.9%
Exceptional
11.5%
Single Males
Fair
13.0%
Exceptional
11.1%
Single Females
Tragic
22.9%
Exceptional
19.1%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.1%
Exceptional
12.7%
Single Mothers
Tragic
30.6%
Exceptional
26.8%
Married Couples
Tragic
5.7%
Tragic
5.9%
Seniors Over 65 years
Fair
11.1%
Good
10.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Good
12.0%
Tragic
16.1%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
13.8%
Tragic
15.7%

Immigrants from Laos vs Tsimshian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.5% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 152.1%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.9% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 81.6%), and male unemployment (5.4% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 55.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.1% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 1.1%), female unemployment (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.7%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.6% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 2.0%).
Immigrants from Laos vs Tsimshian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from LaosTsimshian
Unemployment
Fair
5.3%
Tragic
7.2%
Males
Poor
5.4%
Tragic
8.5%
Females
Average
5.3%
Fair
5.4%
Youth < 25
Good
11.5%
Tragic
16.5%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Excellent
17.1%
Good
17.3%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.9%
Tragic
18.0%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Good
6.6%
Tragic
8.0%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Average
5.5%
Tragic
13.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Fair
4.7%
Tragic
6.2%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Fair
4.6%
Good
4.5%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
5.2%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Good
5.3%
Exceptional
4.6%
Seniors > 65
Good
5.1%
Exceptional
4.5%
Seniors > 75
Fair
8.9%
Tragic
10.5%
Women w/ Children < 6
Average
7.6%
Exceptional
6.6%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.2%
Tragic
11.4%
Women w/ Children < 18
Fair
5.5%
Poor
5.6%

Immigrants from Laos vs Tsimshian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.6% compared to 37.4%, a difference of 8.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 72.3%, a difference of 7.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.6% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 5.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (83.8% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 0.32%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.4% compared to 78.7%, a difference of 0.87%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.2% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 2.0%).
Immigrants from Laos vs Tsimshian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from LaosTsimshian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.0%
Tragic
64.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Fair
79.4%
Tragic
78.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
40.6%
Excellent
37.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
77.4%
Tragic
72.3%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Good
84.8%
Exceptional
88.7%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
84.2%
Exceptional
85.8%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
83.8%
Tragic
83.5%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
81.6%
Tragic
77.4%

Immigrants from Laos vs Tsimshian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.7% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 27.5%), births to unmarried women (34.0% compared to 42.2%, a difference of 24.0%), and family households with children (29.8% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 10.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (2.9% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 1.1%), family households (65.3% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 2.7%), and average family size (3.34 compared to 3.25, a difference of 2.7%).
Immigrants from Laos vs Tsimshian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from LaosTsimshian
Family Households
Exceptional
65.3%
Exceptional
67.1%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
29.8%
Tragic
27.0%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
45.1%
Exceptional
48.7%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.34
Excellent
3.25
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.9%
Tragic
2.9%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.7%
Excellent
6.0%
Currently Married
Tragic
45.0%
Exceptional
47.7%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.4%
Tragic
13.3%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
34.0%
Tragic
42.2%

Immigrants from Laos vs Tsimshian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 25.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.4% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 17.3%), and no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.8% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 0.45%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.2% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 4.4%), and no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 5.1%).
Immigrants from Laos vs Tsimshian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from LaosTsimshian
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.2%
Exceptional
8.6%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
91.8%
Exceptional
91.4%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.2%
Exceptional
56.7%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
22.4%
Fair
19.1%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.7%
Fair
6.2%

Immigrants from Laos vs Tsimshian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.1% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 90.0%), bachelor's degree (31.6% compared to 28.8%, a difference of 9.9%), and college, 1 year or more (54.7% compared to 57.9%, a difference of 6.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of master's degree (11.4% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 0.33%), professional degree (3.2% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 2.0%), and nursery school (96.9% compared to 98.9%, a difference of 2.1%).
Immigrants from Laos vs Tsimshian Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from LaosTsimshian
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
3.1%
Exceptional
1.7%
Nursery School
Tragic
96.9%
Exceptional
98.9%
Kindergarten
Tragic
96.9%
Exceptional
98.8%
1st Grade
Tragic
96.8%
Exceptional
98.8%
2nd Grade
Tragic
96.7%
Exceptional
98.8%
3rd Grade
Tragic
96.6%
Exceptional
98.8%
4th Grade
Tragic
96.3%
Exceptional
98.6%
5th Grade
Tragic
96.0%
Exceptional
98.4%
6th Grade
Tragic
95.7%
Exceptional
98.3%
7th Grade
Tragic
94.5%
Exceptional
97.8%
8th Grade
Tragic
94.1%
Exceptional
99.0%
9th Grade
Tragic
93.2%
Exceptional
97.0%
10th Grade
Tragic
91.9%
Exceptional
95.6%
11th Grade
Tragic
90.5%
Exceptional
94.4%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
88.9%
Exceptional
92.9%
High School Diploma
Tragic
86.6%
Exceptional
91.3%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
82.7%
Excellent
86.6%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
61.3%
Poor
64.3%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
54.7%
Poor
57.9%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
40.7%
Tragic
38.6%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
31.6%
Tragic
28.8%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.4%
Tragic
11.4%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.2%
Tragic
3.2%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.4%
Tragic
1.4%

Immigrants from Laos vs Tsimshian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 91.9%), hearing disability (3.2% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 47.9%), and ambulatory disability (6.3% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 40.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 1.5%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.2% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 2.2%), and cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 4.5%).
Immigrants from Laos vs Tsimshian Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from LaosTsimshian
Disability
Tragic
12.4%
Tragic
16.1%
Males
Tragic
11.9%
Tragic
15.6%
Females
Tragic
12.8%
Tragic
16.8%
Age | Under 5 years
Fair
1.3%
Tragic
2.4%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
5.8%
Tragic
7.9%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.2%
Tragic
7.4%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
13.0%
Tragic
16.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
26.1%
Tragic
32.9%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
49.2%
Tragic
59.2%
Vision
Tragic
2.4%
Tragic
3.2%
Hearing
Tragic
3.2%
Tragic
4.7%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.1%
Average
17.3%
Ambulatory
Poor
6.3%
Tragic
8.8%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.7%
Tragic
2.6%