Houma vs Tsimshian Community Comparison
COMPARE
Houma
Tsimshian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Houma
Tsimshian
384
SOCIAL INDEX
1.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
346th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
4,927
SOCIAL INDEX
46.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
189th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Tsimshian Integration in Houma Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 5,201,288 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Tsimshian within Houma communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 1.000. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Houma within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.164% in Tsimshian. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Houma corresponds to an increase of 163.9 Tsimshian.
Houma vs Tsimshian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Houma and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (38.7% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 61.9%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($72,093 compared to $96,783, a difference of 34.3%), and median family income ($76,188 compared to $101,543, a difference of 33.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($50,547 compared to $48,836, a difference of 3.5%), median earnings ($38,949 compared to $43,695, a difference of 12.2%), and per capita income ($32,996 compared to $40,344, a difference of 22.3%).
Income Metric | Houma | Tsimshian |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $32,996 | Tragic $40,344 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $76,188 | Fair $101,543 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $62,575 | Fair $83,346 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $38,949 | Tragic $43,695 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $50,547 | Tragic $48,836 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $30,343 | Average $39,530 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $44,356 | Exceptional $54,649 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $77,044 | Excellent $97,809 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $72,093 | Poor $96,783 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $44,822 | Tragic $58,202 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 38.7% | Exceptional 23.9% |
Houma vs Tsimshian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Houma and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (23.5% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 111.6%), single father poverty (26.7% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 110.6%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (21.5% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 87.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (16.2% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 1.1%), receiving food stamps (16.5% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 4.6%), and married-couple family poverty (6.4% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 8.2%).
Poverty Metric | Houma | Tsimshian |
Poverty | Tragic 18.4% | Tragic 13.0% |
Families | Tragic 14.6% | Good 8.8% |
Males | Tragic 16.7% | Tragic 12.8% |
Females | Tragic 20.0% | Good 13.1% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 26.2% | Tragic 21.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 22.7% | Exceptional 12.7% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 22.7% | Exceptional 14.7% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 24.9% | Exceptional 14.1% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 26.2% | Average 16.4% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 21.5% | Exceptional 11.5% |
Single Males | Tragic 23.5% | Exceptional 11.1% |
Single Females | Tragic 33.8% | Exceptional 19.1% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 26.7% | Exceptional 12.7% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 43.5% | Exceptional 26.8% |
Married Couples | Tragic 6.4% | Tragic 5.9% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 14.7% | Good 10.8% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 16.2% | Tragic 16.1% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 16.5% | Tragic 15.7% |
Houma vs Tsimshian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Houma and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (7.2% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 92.4%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.4% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 42.3%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (12.6% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 42.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.8% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 5.4%), unemployment (6.7% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 8.0%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (8.7% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 8.6%).
Unemployment Metric | Houma | Tsimshian |
Unemployment | Tragic 6.7% | Tragic 7.2% |
Males | Tragic 7.1% | Tragic 8.5% |
Females | Tragic 6.4% | Fair 5.4% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 13.8% | Tragic 16.5% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 21.6% | Good 17.3% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 12.6% | Tragic 18.0% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 8.7% | Tragic 8.0% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 7.2% | Tragic 13.8% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 7.8% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 5.6% | Good 4.5% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.6% | Tragic 5.2% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Fair 4.9% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.8% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.8% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.1% | Tragic 10.5% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 9.4% | Exceptional 6.6% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 12.5% | Tragic 11.4% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 6.8% | Poor 5.6% |
Houma vs Tsimshian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Houma and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 25-29 (81.2% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 9.2%), in labor force | age > 16 (59.5% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 8.4%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (72.7% compared to 78.7%, a difference of 8.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (73.7% compared to 72.3%, a difference of 1.9%), in labor force | age 45-54 (74.1% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 4.5%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (35.6% compared to 37.4%, a difference of 4.9%).
Labor Participation Metric | Houma | Tsimshian |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 59.5% | Tragic 64.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 72.7% | Tragic 78.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Poor 35.6% | Excellent 37.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 73.7% | Tragic 72.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 81.2% | Exceptional 88.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 79.9% | Exceptional 85.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 79.5% | Tragic 83.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 74.1% | Tragic 77.4% |
Houma vs Tsimshian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Houma and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.9% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 31.9%), births to unmarried women (46.6% compared to 42.2%, a difference of 10.4%), and married-couple households (44.6% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 9.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (2.9% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 1.1%), divorced or separated (13.6% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 1.9%), and family households (65.7% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 2.1%).
Family Structure Metric | Houma | Tsimshian |
Family Households | Exceptional 65.7% | Exceptional 67.1% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.5% | Tragic 27.0% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 44.6% | Exceptional 48.7% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.18 | Excellent 3.25 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.9% | Tragic 2.9% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.9% | Excellent 6.0% |
Currently Married | Tragic 45.5% | Exceptional 47.7% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 13.6% | Tragic 13.3% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 46.6% | Tragic 42.2% |
Houma vs Tsimshian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Houma and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.5% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 33.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.9% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 25.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.1% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 18.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.6% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 3.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.4% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 4.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.1% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 18.8%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Houma | Tsimshian |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 11.5% | Exceptional 8.6% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 88.6% | Exceptional 91.4% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Poor 54.4% | Exceptional 56.7% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 16.1% | Fair 19.1% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 4.9% | Fair 6.2% |
Houma vs Tsimshian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Houma and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.8% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 68.1%), doctorate degree (0.96% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 46.7%), and master's degree (7.9% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 44.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (97.3% compared to 98.8%, a difference of 1.6%), nursery school (97.3% compared to 98.9%, a difference of 1.6%), and 1st grade (97.2% compared to 98.8%, a difference of 1.6%).
Education Level Metric | Houma | Tsimshian |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 2.8% | Exceptional 1.7% |
Nursery School | Tragic 97.3% | Exceptional 98.9% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 97.3% | Exceptional 98.8% |
1st Grade | Tragic 97.2% | Exceptional 98.8% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 97.2% | Exceptional 98.8% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 97.1% | Exceptional 98.8% |
4th Grade | Tragic 96.8% | Exceptional 98.6% |
5th Grade | Tragic 96.6% | Exceptional 98.4% |
6th Grade | Tragic 96.2% | Exceptional 98.3% |
7th Grade | Tragic 95.1% | Exceptional 97.8% |
8th Grade | Tragic 94.2% | Exceptional 99.0% |
9th Grade | Tragic 92.3% | Exceptional 97.0% |
10th Grade | Tragic 90.2% | Exceptional 95.6% |
11th Grade | Tragic 87.0% | Exceptional 94.4% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 83.7% | Exceptional 92.9% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 81.5% | Exceptional 91.3% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 75.0% | Excellent 86.6% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 47.6% | Poor 64.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 41.2% | Poor 57.9% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 28.2% | Tragic 38.6% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 21.4% | Tragic 28.8% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 7.9% | Tragic 11.4% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 2.2% | Tragic 3.2% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 0.96% | Tragic 1.4% |
Houma vs Tsimshian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Houma and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (9.7% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 31.2%), disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 29.0%), and disability age 5 to 17 (9.1% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 14.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (16.9% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 0.77%), disability age 65 to 74 (32.3% compared to 32.9%, a difference of 1.9%), and disability age over 75 (56.2% compared to 59.2%, a difference of 5.4%).
Disability Metric | Houma | Tsimshian |
Disability | Tragic 17.1% | Tragic 16.1% |
Males | Tragic 17.4% | Tragic 15.6% |
Females | Tragic 16.9% | Tragic 16.8% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.9% | Tragic 2.4% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 9.1% | Tragic 7.9% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 9.7% | Tragic 7.4% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 18.7% | Tragic 16.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 32.3% | Tragic 32.9% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 56.2% | Tragic 59.2% |
Vision | Tragic 3.4% | Tragic 3.2% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.2% | Tragic 4.7% |
Cognitive | Tragic 19.3% | Average 17.3% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 9.3% | Tragic 8.8% |
Self-Care | Tragic 3.0% | Tragic 2.6% |