Immigrants from Uruguay vs Tsimshian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Uruguay
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Tsimshian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Uruguay

Tsimshian

Fair
Average
3,806
SOCIAL INDEX
35.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
209th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
4,927
SOCIAL INDEX
46.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
189th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Tsimshian Integration in Immigrants from Uruguay Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 9,450,336 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Tsimshian within Immigrant from Uruguay communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 1.000. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Uruguay within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.048% in Tsimshian. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Uruguay corresponds to an increase of 47.6 Tsimshian.
Immigrants from Uruguay Integration in Tsimshian Communities

Immigrants from Uruguay vs Tsimshian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($43,997 compared to $40,344, a difference of 9.0%), median male earnings ($52,860 compared to $48,836, a difference of 8.2%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($91,171 compared to $97,809, a difference of 7.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($96,086 compared to $96,783, a difference of 0.73%), median household income ($82,560 compared to $83,346, a difference of 0.95%), and median female earnings ($38,945 compared to $39,530, a difference of 1.5%).
Immigrants from Uruguay vs Tsimshian Income
Income MetricImmigrants from UruguayTsimshian
Per Capita Income
Average
$43,997
Tragic
$40,344
Median Family Income
Tragic
$98,205
Fair
$101,543
Median Household Income
Poor
$82,560
Fair
$83,346
Median Earnings
Fair
$45,682
Tragic
$43,695
Median Male Earnings
Poor
$52,860
Tragic
$48,836
Median Female Earnings
Poor
$38,945
Average
$39,530
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Average
$52,302
Exceptional
$54,649
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Poor
$91,171
Excellent
$97,809
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Poor
$96,086
Poor
$96,783
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$56,975
Tragic
$58,202
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
24.6%
Exceptional
23.9%

Immigrants from Uruguay vs Tsimshian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among girls under 16 (16.7% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 46.0%), receiving food stamps (12.5% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 25.6%), and single father poverty (15.6% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 22.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of poverty (12.8% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 1.4%), married-couple family poverty (5.7% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 3.2%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (17.2% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 4.5%).
Immigrants from Uruguay vs Tsimshian Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from UruguayTsimshian
Poverty
Poor
12.8%
Tragic
13.0%
Families
Poor
9.5%
Good
8.8%
Males
Poor
11.6%
Tragic
12.8%
Females
Poor
14.0%
Good
13.1%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
18.8%
Tragic
21.2%
Females 25 to 34 years
Fair
13.7%
Exceptional
12.7%
Children Under 5 years
Fair
17.7%
Exceptional
14.7%
Children Under 16 years
Fair
16.8%
Exceptional
14.1%
Boys Under 16 years
Poor
17.2%
Average
16.4%
Girls Under 16 years
Fair
16.7%
Exceptional
11.5%
Single Males
Exceptional
11.9%
Exceptional
11.1%
Single Females
Good
20.6%
Exceptional
19.1%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.6%
Exceptional
12.7%
Single Mothers
Average
29.1%
Exceptional
26.8%
Married Couples
Tragic
5.7%
Tragic
5.9%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
12.8%
Good
10.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
14.3%
Tragic
16.1%
Receiving Food Stamps
Poor
12.5%
Tragic
15.7%

Immigrants from Uruguay vs Tsimshian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 158.1%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.1% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 77.9%), and male unemployment (5.2% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 62.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.6% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 1.6%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.6% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 2.0%), and female unemployment (5.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 2.7%).
Immigrants from Uruguay vs Tsimshian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from UruguayTsimshian
Unemployment
Fair
5.3%
Tragic
7.2%
Males
Good
5.2%
Tragic
8.5%
Females
Tragic
5.5%
Fair
5.4%
Youth < 25
Good
11.5%
Tragic
16.5%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Average
17.6%
Good
17.3%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Excellent
10.1%
Tragic
18.0%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Excellent
6.5%
Tragic
8.0%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Good
5.3%
Tragic
13.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Poor
4.9%
Tragic
6.2%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Fair
4.6%
Good
4.5%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Good
4.8%
Tragic
5.2%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.1%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.5%
Exceptional
4.6%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.2%
Exceptional
4.5%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.5%
Tragic
10.5%
Women w/ Children < 6
Average
7.7%
Exceptional
6.6%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.2%
Tragic
11.4%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
5.9%
Poor
5.6%

Immigrants from Uruguay vs Tsimshian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.4% compared to 37.4%, a difference of 8.6%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 7.4%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.6% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 1.2%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 78.7%, a difference of 1.8%).
Immigrants from Uruguay vs Tsimshian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from UruguayTsimshian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.0%
Tragic
64.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.1%
Tragic
78.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
34.4%
Excellent
37.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Poor
74.6%
Tragic
72.3%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Excellent
84.9%
Exceptional
88.7%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Average
84.7%
Exceptional
85.8%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Excellent
84.6%
Tragic
83.5%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.2%
Tragic
77.4%

Immigrants from Uruguay vs Tsimshian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (33.9% compared to 42.2%, a difference of 24.3%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 19.1%), and single mother households (6.7% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 12.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.23 compared to 3.25, a difference of 0.60%), family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 1.2%), and family households (63.9% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 5.0%).
Immigrants from Uruguay vs Tsimshian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from UruguayTsimshian
Family Households
Poor
63.9%
Exceptional
67.1%
Family Households with Children
Fair
27.4%
Tragic
27.0%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
44.5%
Exceptional
48.7%
Average Family Size
Average
3.23
Excellent
3.25
Single Father Households
Poor
2.4%
Tragic
2.9%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
6.7%
Excellent
6.0%
Currently Married
Tragic
45.0%
Exceptional
47.7%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.6%
Tragic
13.3%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
33.9%
Tragic
42.2%

Immigrants from Uruguay vs Tsimshian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.9% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 39.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 13.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.1% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 11.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.1% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 3.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.4% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 10.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.1% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 11.6%).
Immigrants from Uruguay vs Tsimshian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from UruguayTsimshian
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
11.9%
Exceptional
8.6%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
88.1%
Exceptional
91.4%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
51.4%
Exceptional
56.7%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
17.1%
Fair
19.1%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
5.4%
Fair
6.2%

Immigrants from Uruguay vs Tsimshian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.6% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 43.4%), no schooling completed (2.3% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 40.4%), and master's degree (15.0% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 31.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, 1 year or more (58.1% compared to 57.9%, a difference of 0.19%), nursery school (97.7% compared to 98.9%, a difference of 1.2%), and kindergarten (97.7% compared to 98.8%, a difference of 1.2%).
Immigrants from Uruguay vs Tsimshian Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from UruguayTsimshian
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.3%
Exceptional
1.7%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.7%
Exceptional
98.9%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.7%
Exceptional
98.8%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.6%
Exceptional
98.8%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.6%
Exceptional
98.8%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.4%
Exceptional
98.8%
4th Grade
Tragic
97.1%
Exceptional
98.6%
5th Grade
Tragic
96.9%
Exceptional
98.4%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.5%
Exceptional
98.3%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.2%
Exceptional
97.8%
8th Grade
Tragic
94.8%
Exceptional
99.0%
9th Grade
Tragic
93.8%
Exceptional
97.0%
10th Grade
Tragic
92.5%
Exceptional
95.6%
11th Grade
Tragic
91.3%
Exceptional
94.4%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
90.0%
Exceptional
92.9%
High School Diploma
Tragic
87.6%
Exceptional
91.3%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
84.4%
Excellent
86.6%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
63.4%
Poor
64.3%
College, 1 year or more
Poor
58.1%
Poor
57.9%
Associate's Degree
Fair
45.8%
Tragic
38.6%
Bachelor's Degree
Average
37.8%
Tragic
28.8%
Master's Degree
Average
15.0%
Tragic
11.4%
Professional Degree
Good
4.6%
Tragic
3.2%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.7%
Tragic
1.4%

Immigrants from Uruguay vs Tsimshian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 95.9%), hearing disability (2.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 71.4%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.3% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 61.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 1.9%), self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 9.1%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.2% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 19.5%).
Immigrants from Uruguay vs Tsimshian Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from UruguayTsimshian
Disability
Exceptional
11.3%
Tragic
16.1%
Males
Exceptional
10.8%
Tragic
15.6%
Females
Exceptional
11.7%
Tragic
16.8%
Age | Under 5 years
Average
1.2%
Tragic
2.4%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Fair
5.6%
Tragic
7.9%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Tragic
7.4%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.3%
Tragic
16.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
22.6%
Tragic
32.9%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.4%
Tragic
59.2%
Vision
Poor
2.2%
Tragic
3.2%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.7%
Tragic
4.7%
Cognitive
Exceptional
17.0%
Average
17.3%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.9%
Tragic
8.8%
Self-Care
Excellent
2.4%
Tragic
2.6%