Sudanese vs Tsimshian Community Comparison
COMPARE
Sudanese
Tsimshian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Sudanese
Tsimshian
4,867
SOCIAL INDEX
46.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
190th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
4,927
SOCIAL INDEX
46.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
189th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Tsimshian Integration in Sudanese Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 9,648,902 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Tsimshian within Sudanese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.988. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Sudanese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.258% in Tsimshian. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Sudanese corresponds to an increase of 258.4 Tsimshian.
Sudanese vs Tsimshian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Sudanese and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($46,982 compared to $54,649, a difference of 16.3%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($84,401 compared to $97,809, a difference of 15.9%), and median household income ($78,529 compared to $83,346, a difference of 6.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($58,281 compared to $58,202, a difference of 0.14%), wage/income gap (24.0% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 0.39%), and median earnings ($44,419 compared to $43,695, a difference of 1.7%).
Income Metric | Sudanese | Tsimshian |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $41,695 | Tragic $40,344 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $96,783 | Fair $101,543 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $78,529 | Fair $83,346 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $44,419 | Tragic $43,695 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $51,216 | Tragic $48,836 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $38,215 | Average $39,530 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $46,982 | Exceptional $54,649 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $84,401 | Excellent $97,809 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $93,718 | Poor $96,783 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $58,281 | Tragic $58,202 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 24.0% | Exceptional 23.9% |
Sudanese vs Tsimshian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Sudanese and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among girls under 16 (18.6% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 62.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.8% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 36.4%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (18.5% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 31.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male poverty (12.8% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 0.31%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 0.38%), and married-couple family poverty (5.6% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 4.8%).
Poverty Metric | Sudanese | Tsimshian |
Poverty | Tragic 14.0% | Tragic 13.0% |
Families | Tragic 10.0% | Good 8.8% |
Males | Tragic 12.8% | Tragic 12.8% |
Females | Tragic 15.2% | Good 13.1% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 23.0% | Tragic 21.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 14.4% | Exceptional 12.7% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 19.3% | Exceptional 14.7% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 18.5% | Exceptional 14.1% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 18.6% | Average 16.4% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 18.6% | Exceptional 11.5% |
Single Males | Poor 13.1% | Exceptional 11.1% |
Single Females | Tragic 22.6% | Exceptional 19.1% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.9% | Exceptional 12.7% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 30.0% | Exceptional 26.8% |
Married Couples | Tragic 5.6% | Tragic 5.9% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Good 10.7% | Good 10.8% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Excellent 11.8% | Tragic 16.1% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Fair 12.0% | Tragic 15.7% |
Sudanese vs Tsimshian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Sudanese and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (4.6% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 201.5%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.2% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 96.0%), and male unemployment (4.8% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 75.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.36%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 0.93%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.4% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 2.7%).
Unemployment Metric | Sudanese | Tsimshian |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.8% | Tragic 7.2% |
Males | Exceptional 4.8% | Tragic 8.5% |
Females | Exceptional 4.8% | Fair 5.4% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 10.6% | Tragic 16.5% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 15.8% | Good 17.3% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.2% | Tragic 18.0% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 5.4% | Tragic 8.0% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 4.6% | Tragic 13.8% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.1% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Good 4.5% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.6% | Tragic 5.2% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.6% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.4% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 8.3% | Tragic 10.5% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Fair 7.8% | Exceptional 6.6% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 7.4% | Tragic 11.4% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Excellent 5.3% | Poor 5.6% |
Sudanese vs Tsimshian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Sudanese and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (42.9% compared to 37.4%, a difference of 14.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (78.4% compared to 72.3%, a difference of 8.5%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.0% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 7.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.2% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 0.75%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.0% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.8% compared to 78.7%, a difference of 2.8%).
Labor Participation Metric | Sudanese | Tsimshian |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 68.0% | Tragic 64.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.8% | Tragic 78.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 42.9% | Excellent 37.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 78.4% | Tragic 72.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 85.9% | Exceptional 88.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.2% | Exceptional 85.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 85.0% | Tragic 83.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Excellent 83.0% | Tragic 77.4% |
Sudanese vs Tsimshian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Sudanese and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (32.4% compared to 42.2%, a difference of 30.1%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 19.5%), and married-couple households (42.1% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 15.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 1.2%), average family size (3.20 compared to 3.25, a difference of 1.5%), and divorced or separated (12.4% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 7.7%).
Family Structure Metric | Sudanese | Tsimshian |
Family Households | Tragic 60.0% | Exceptional 67.1% |
Family Households with Children | Fair 27.4% | Tragic 27.0% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 42.1% | Exceptional 48.7% |
Average Family Size | Poor 3.20 | Excellent 3.25 |
Single Father Households | Poor 2.4% | Tragic 2.9% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 6.9% | Excellent 6.0% |
Currently Married | Tragic 43.7% | Exceptional 47.7% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 12.4% | Tragic 13.3% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Fair 32.4% | Tragic 42.2% |
Sudanese vs Tsimshian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Sudanese and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 14.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.6% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 9.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.8% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 6.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.3% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 1.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.6% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 5.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.8% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 6.9%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Sudanese | Tsimshian |
No Vehicles Available | Excellent 9.8% | Exceptional 8.6% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 90.3% | Exceptional 91.4% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 53.6% | Exceptional 56.7% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 17.8% | Fair 19.1% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 5.6% | Fair 6.2% |
Sudanese vs Tsimshian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Sudanese and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 48.9%), professional degree (4.6% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 45.9%), and no schooling completed (2.3% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 39.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.7% compared to 98.9%, a difference of 1.2%), kindergarten (97.7% compared to 98.8%, a difference of 1.2%), and 1st grade (97.7% compared to 98.8%, a difference of 1.2%).
Education Level Metric | Sudanese | Tsimshian |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 2.3% | Exceptional 1.7% |
Nursery School | Tragic 97.7% | Exceptional 98.9% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 97.7% | Exceptional 98.8% |
1st Grade | Tragic 97.7% | Exceptional 98.8% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 97.7% | Exceptional 98.8% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 97.5% | Exceptional 98.8% |
4th Grade | Tragic 97.3% | Exceptional 98.6% |
5th Grade | Tragic 97.1% | Exceptional 98.4% |
6th Grade | Poor 96.8% | Exceptional 98.3% |
7th Grade | Fair 95.9% | Exceptional 97.8% |
8th Grade | Fair 95.6% | Exceptional 99.0% |
9th Grade | Fair 94.7% | Exceptional 97.0% |
10th Grade | Fair 93.6% | Exceptional 95.6% |
11th Grade | Average 92.5% | Exceptional 94.4% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Fair 91.0% | Exceptional 92.9% |
High School Diploma | Average 89.1% | Exceptional 91.3% |
GED/Equivalency | Fair 85.5% | Excellent 86.6% |
College, Under 1 year | Good 66.2% | Poor 64.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Good 60.2% | Poor 57.9% |
Associate's Degree | Good 47.1% | Tragic 38.6% |
Bachelor's Degree | Good 38.9% | Tragic 28.8% |
Master's Degree | Good 15.3% | Tragic 11.4% |
Professional Degree | Excellent 4.6% | Tragic 3.2% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.1% | Tragic 1.4% |
Sudanese vs Tsimshian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Sudanese and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 112.2%), hearing disability (2.9% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 60.7%), and ambulatory disability (5.7% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 54.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (6.9% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 7.2%), cognitive disability (18.9% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 9.2%), and self-care disability (2.2% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 20.3%).
Disability Metric | Sudanese | Tsimshian |
Disability | Good 11.5% | Tragic 16.1% |
Males | Good 11.0% | Tragic 15.6% |
Females | Good 12.0% | Tragic 16.8% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.1% | Tragic 2.4% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 5.8% | Tragic 7.9% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 6.9% | Tragic 7.4% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 11.9% | Tragic 16.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Fair 23.7% | Tragic 32.9% |
Age | Over 75 years | Fair 47.5% | Tragic 59.2% |
Vision | Excellent 2.1% | Tragic 3.2% |
Hearing | Good 2.9% | Tragic 4.7% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.9% | Average 17.3% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.7% | Tragic 8.8% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.2% | Tragic 2.6% |