Taiwanese vs Tsimshian Community Comparison
COMPARE
Taiwanese
Tsimshian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Taiwanese
Tsimshian
6,532
SOCIAL INDEX
62.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
151st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
4,927
SOCIAL INDEX
46.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
189th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Tsimshian Integration in Taiwanese Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 2,633,186 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Tsimshian within Taiwanese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.059. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Taiwanese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.021% in Tsimshian. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Taiwanese corresponds to an increase of 21.3 Tsimshian.
Taiwanese vs Tsimshian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($46,455 compared to $40,344, a difference of 15.1%), median male earnings ($55,556 compared to $48,836, a difference of 13.8%), and householder income under 25 years ($49,804 compared to $54,649, a difference of 9.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($40,576 compared to $39,530, a difference of 2.6%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($101,492 compared to $97,809, a difference of 3.8%), and wage/income gap (25.1% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 5.3%).
Income Metric | Taiwanese | Tsimshian |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $46,455 | Tragic $40,344 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $107,295 | Fair $101,543 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $89,900 | Fair $83,346 |
Median Earnings | Excellent $47,902 | Tragic $43,695 |
Median Male Earnings | Good $55,556 | Tragic $48,836 |
Median Female Earnings | Excellent $40,576 | Average $39,530 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $49,804 | Exceptional $54,649 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $101,492 | Excellent $97,809 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Excellent $104,180 | Poor $96,783 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Excellent $62,894 | Tragic $58,202 |
Wage/Income Gap | Excellent 25.1% | Exceptional 23.9% |
Taiwanese vs Tsimshian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (11.0% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 42.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.6% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 27.9%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (14.6% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 27.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty (13.1% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 0.030%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.2% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 0.10%), and single female poverty (19.4% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 1.7%).
Poverty Metric | Taiwanese | Tsimshian |
Poverty | Good 12.2% | Tragic 13.0% |
Families | Exceptional 8.2% | Good 8.8% |
Males | Good 11.0% | Tragic 12.8% |
Females | Good 13.1% | Good 13.1% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 21.2% | Tragic 21.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 11.8% | Exceptional 12.7% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 14.5% | Exceptional 14.7% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.5% | Exceptional 14.1% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.8% | Average 16.4% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.6% | Exceptional 11.5% |
Single Males | Exceptional 10.9% | Exceptional 11.1% |
Single Females | Exceptional 19.4% | Exceptional 19.1% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 14.3% | Exceptional 12.7% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 27.5% | Exceptional 26.8% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.8% | Tragic 5.9% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Fair 11.2% | Good 10.8% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Poor 12.6% | Tragic 16.1% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Excellent 11.0% | Tragic 15.7% |
Taiwanese vs Tsimshian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 158.1%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.4% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 90.5%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (6.5% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 76.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 0.21%), female unemployment (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.4%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.1% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 8.7%).
Unemployment Metric | Taiwanese | Tsimshian |
Unemployment | Average 5.3% | Tragic 7.2% |
Males | Fair 5.3% | Tragic 8.5% |
Females | Average 5.3% | Fair 5.4% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 10.8% | Tragic 16.5% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 15.5% | Good 17.3% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.4% | Tragic 18.0% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.1% | Tragic 8.0% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Good 5.3% | Tragic 13.8% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Good 4.5% | Good 4.5% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.6% | Tragic 5.2% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.3% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 6.3% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 6.0% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 6.6% | Tragic 10.5% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.1% | Exceptional 6.6% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 6.5% | Tragic 11.4% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 4.8% | Poor 5.6% |
Taiwanese vs Tsimshian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.8% compared to 37.4%, a difference of 10.4%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 7.7%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.4% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.6% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 1.5%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.1% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.2% compared to 78.7%, a difference of 2.0%).
Labor Participation Metric | Taiwanese | Tsimshian |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 66.2% | Tragic 64.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.2% | Tragic 78.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 33.8% | Excellent 37.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Fair 74.7% | Tragic 72.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 85.4% | Exceptional 88.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Fair 84.6% | Exceptional 85.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 85.1% | Tragic 83.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.4% | Tragic 77.4% |
Taiwanese vs Tsimshian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (29.0% compared to 42.2%, a difference of 45.5%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 31.5%), and divorced or separated (11.5% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 16.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.23 compared to 3.25, a difference of 0.56%), family households with children (26.7% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 1.1%), and currently married (45.8% compared to 47.7%, a difference of 4.2%).
Family Structure Metric | Taiwanese | Tsimshian |
Family Households | Tragic 63.3% | Exceptional 67.1% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.7% | Tragic 27.0% |
Married-couple Households | Fair 45.9% | Exceptional 48.7% |
Average Family Size | Average 3.23 | Excellent 3.25 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.2% | Tragic 2.9% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.8% | Excellent 6.0% |
Currently Married | Poor 45.8% | Exceptional 47.7% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.5% | Tragic 13.3% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 29.0% | Tragic 42.2% |
Taiwanese vs Tsimshian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.7% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 35.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 13.9%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (53.9% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 5.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.4% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 3.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.0% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 4.9%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (53.9% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 5.2%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Taiwanese | Tsimshian |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 11.7% | Exceptional 8.6% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 88.4% | Exceptional 91.4% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 53.9% | Exceptional 56.7% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 20.0% | Fair 19.1% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.0% | Fair 6.2% |
Taiwanese vs Tsimshian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.0% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 56.5%), no schooling completed (2.5% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 50.3%), and doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 47.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.9%, a difference of 1.3%), kindergarten (97.5% compared to 98.8%, a difference of 1.3%), and 1st grade (97.5% compared to 98.8%, a difference of 1.4%).
Education Level Metric | Taiwanese | Tsimshian |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 2.5% | Exceptional 1.7% |
Nursery School | Tragic 97.6% | Exceptional 98.9% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 97.5% | Exceptional 98.8% |
1st Grade | Tragic 97.5% | Exceptional 98.8% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 97.4% | Exceptional 98.8% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 97.3% | Exceptional 98.8% |
4th Grade | Tragic 97.0% | Exceptional 98.6% |
5th Grade | Tragic 96.7% | Exceptional 98.4% |
6th Grade | Tragic 96.5% | Exceptional 98.3% |
7th Grade | Tragic 94.8% | Exceptional 97.8% |
8th Grade | Tragic 94.7% | Exceptional 99.0% |
9th Grade | Tragic 93.6% | Exceptional 97.0% |
10th Grade | Tragic 92.5% | Exceptional 95.6% |
11th Grade | Tragic 91.3% | Exceptional 94.4% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.0% | Exceptional 92.9% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 87.9% | Exceptional 91.3% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 84.7% | Excellent 86.6% |
College, Under 1 year | Good 66.4% | Poor 64.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Excellent 60.7% | Poor 57.9% |
Associate's Degree | Excellent 47.7% | Tragic 38.6% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 40.0% | Tragic 28.8% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 16.1% | Tragic 11.4% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 3.2% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.1% | Tragic 1.4% |
Taiwanese vs Tsimshian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 83.0%), disability age 35 to 64 (9.8% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 69.9%), and hearing disability (2.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 68.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 1.8%), self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 10.1%), and disability age over 75 (48.2% compared to 59.2%, a difference of 23.0%).
Disability Metric | Taiwanese | Tsimshian |
Disability | Exceptional 10.8% | Tragic 16.1% |
Males | Exceptional 10.3% | Tragic 15.6% |
Females | Exceptional 11.4% | Tragic 16.8% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.3% | Tragic 2.4% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 4.9% | Tragic 7.9% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 6.0% | Tragic 7.4% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 9.8% | Tragic 16.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Excellent 22.7% | Tragic 32.9% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 48.2% | Tragic 59.2% |
Vision | Exceptional 1.9% | Tragic 3.2% |
Hearing | Exceptional 2.8% | Tragic 4.7% |
Cognitive | Tragic 17.6% | Average 17.3% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.6% | Tragic 8.8% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.4% | Tragic 2.6% |