Laotian vs Tsimshian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Laotian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Tsimshian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Laotians

Tsimshian

Good
Average
8,033
SOCIAL INDEX
77.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
91st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
4,927
SOCIAL INDEX
46.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
189th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Tsimshian Integration in Laotian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 13,400,062 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Tsimshian within Laotian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.836. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Laotians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 1.963% in Tsimshian. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Laotians corresponds to an increase of 1,963.2 Tsimshian.
Laotian Integration in Tsimshian Communities

Laotian vs Tsimshian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Laotian and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($59,351 compared to $48,836, a difference of 21.5%), per capita income ($47,041 compared to $40,344, a difference of 16.6%), and median earnings ($50,343 compared to $43,695, a difference of 15.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,369 compared to $54,649, a difference of 0.51%), median female earnings ($42,133 compared to $39,530, a difference of 6.6%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($104,993 compared to $97,809, a difference of 7.3%).
Laotian vs Tsimshian Income
Income MetricLaotianTsimshian
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$47,041
Tragic
$40,344
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$112,859
Fair
$101,543
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$94,990
Fair
$83,346
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$50,343
Tragic
$43,695
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$59,351
Tragic
$48,836
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$42,133
Average
$39,530
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$54,369
Exceptional
$54,649
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$104,993
Excellent
$97,809
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$111,051
Poor
$96,783
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$66,306
Tragic
$58,202
Wage/Income Gap
Poor
26.4%
Exceptional
23.9%

Laotian vs Tsimshian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Laotian and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.0% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 57.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.3% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 30.6%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (14.5% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 26.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 5 (14.7% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 0.080%), single mother poverty (27.0% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 0.48%), and single female poverty (19.3% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 0.80%).
Laotian vs Tsimshian Poverty
Poverty MetricLaotianTsimshian
Poverty
Exceptional
11.6%
Tragic
13.0%
Families
Exceptional
8.1%
Good
8.8%
Males
Exceptional
10.5%
Tragic
12.8%
Females
Exceptional
12.6%
Good
13.1%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
19.2%
Tragic
21.2%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.2%
Exceptional
12.7%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
14.7%
Exceptional
14.7%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.3%
Exceptional
14.1%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.3%
Average
16.4%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.5%
Exceptional
11.5%
Single Males
Exceptional
11.9%
Exceptional
11.1%
Single Females
Exceptional
19.3%
Exceptional
19.1%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.1%
Exceptional
12.7%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
27.0%
Exceptional
26.8%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
5.9%
Seniors Over 65 years
Good
10.6%
Good
10.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Fair
12.3%
Tragic
16.1%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
10.0%
Tragic
15.7%

Laotian vs Tsimshian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Laotian and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 163.5%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.0% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 79.3%), and male unemployment (5.2% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 62.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.2% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 0.59%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 0.91%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.5% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 1.2%).
Laotian vs Tsimshian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricLaotianTsimshian
Unemployment
Good
5.2%
Tragic
7.2%
Males
Good
5.2%
Tragic
8.5%
Females
Average
5.3%
Fair
5.4%
Youth < 25
Good
11.5%
Tragic
16.5%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Excellent
17.2%
Good
17.3%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
10.0%
Tragic
18.0%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Excellent
6.5%
Tragic
8.0%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
13.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Excellent
4.6%
Tragic
6.2%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Excellent
4.4%
Good
4.5%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Good
4.8%
Tragic
5.2%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Good
4.8%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Average
5.4%
Exceptional
4.6%
Seniors > 65
Poor
5.2%
Exceptional
4.5%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
8.2%
Tragic
10.5%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.5%
Exceptional
6.6%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
7.9%
Tragic
11.4%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.2%
Poor
5.6%

Laotian vs Tsimshian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Laotian and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.9% compared to 37.4%, a difference of 7.1%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.9% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 7.0%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 0.75%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.6% compared to 78.7%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 1.4%).
Laotian vs Tsimshian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricLaotianTsimshian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
65.8%
Tragic
64.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Average
79.6%
Tragic
78.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
34.9%
Excellent
37.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
74.1%
Tragic
72.3%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Poor
84.4%
Exceptional
88.7%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Average
84.7%
Exceptional
85.8%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Poor
84.2%
Tragic
83.5%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Good
82.9%
Tragic
77.4%

Laotian vs Tsimshian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Laotian and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (28.5% compared to 42.2%, a difference of 48.1%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 29.6%), and divorced or separated (11.2% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 19.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.26 compared to 3.25, a difference of 0.29%), currently married (47.4% compared to 47.7%, a difference of 0.56%), and married-couple households (48.4% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 0.74%).
Laotian vs Tsimshian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricLaotianTsimshian
Family Households
Exceptional
65.8%
Exceptional
67.1%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.5%
Tragic
27.0%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
48.4%
Exceptional
48.7%
Average Family Size
Excellent
3.26
Excellent
3.25
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.2%
Tragic
2.9%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.8%
Excellent
6.0%
Currently Married
Excellent
47.4%
Exceptional
47.7%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.2%
Tragic
13.3%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
28.5%
Tragic
42.2%

Laotian vs Tsimshian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Laotian and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 19.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 12.7%), and no vehicles in household (9.1% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 5.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 0.41%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.6% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 3.4%), and no vehicles in household (9.1% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 5.5%).
Laotian vs Tsimshian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricLaotianTsimshian
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
9.1%
Exceptional
8.6%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
91.0%
Exceptional
91.4%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
58.6%
Exceptional
56.7%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
21.5%
Fair
19.1%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.4%
Fair
6.2%

Laotian vs Tsimshian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Laotian and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.2% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 64.9%), doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 64.2%), and master's degree (17.0% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 49.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (86.5% compared to 86.6%, a difference of 0.22%), nursery school (97.8% compared to 98.9%, a difference of 1.1%), and kindergarten (97.8% compared to 98.8%, a difference of 1.1%).
Laotian vs Tsimshian Education Level
Education Level MetricLaotianTsimshian
No Schooling Completed
Poor
2.2%
Exceptional
1.7%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.8%
Exceptional
98.9%
Kindergarten
Poor
97.8%
Exceptional
98.8%
1st Grade
Poor
97.8%
Exceptional
98.8%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.7%
Exceptional
98.8%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.6%
Exceptional
98.8%
4th Grade
Tragic
97.3%
Exceptional
98.6%
5th Grade
Poor
97.1%
Exceptional
98.4%
6th Grade
Poor
96.8%
Exceptional
98.3%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.7%
Exceptional
97.8%
8th Grade
Tragic
95.4%
Exceptional
99.0%
9th Grade
Fair
94.6%
Exceptional
97.0%
10th Grade
Fair
93.6%
Exceptional
95.6%
11th Grade
Average
92.6%
Exceptional
94.4%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Good
91.3%
Exceptional
92.9%
High School Diploma
Good
89.3%
Exceptional
91.3%
GED/Equivalency
Excellent
86.5%
Excellent
86.6%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
68.5%
Poor
64.3%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
62.8%
Poor
57.9%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
49.9%
Tragic
38.6%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
42.0%
Tragic
28.8%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
17.0%
Tragic
11.4%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
3.2%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.3%
Tragic
1.4%

Laotian vs Tsimshian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Laotian and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 96.6%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.1% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 65.4%), and hearing disability (2.9% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 62.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 0.010%), self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 9.4%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.2% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 18.7%).
Laotian vs Tsimshian Disability
Disability MetricLaotianTsimshian
Disability
Exceptional
11.0%
Tragic
16.1%
Males
Exceptional
10.6%
Tragic
15.6%
Females
Exceptional
11.4%
Tragic
16.8%
Age | Under 5 years
Good
1.2%
Tragic
2.4%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
7.9%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Tragic
7.4%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.1%
Tragic
16.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
22.3%
Tragic
32.9%
Age | Over 75 years
Poor
47.9%
Tragic
59.2%
Vision
Exceptional
2.0%
Tragic
3.2%
Hearing
Excellent
2.9%
Tragic
4.7%
Cognitive
Average
17.3%
Average
17.3%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.7%
Tragic
8.8%
Self-Care
Excellent
2.4%
Tragic
2.6%