Laotian vs Tsimshian Community Comparison
COMPARE
Laotian
Tsimshian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Laotians
Tsimshian
8,033
SOCIAL INDEX
77.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
91st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
4,927
SOCIAL INDEX
46.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
189th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Tsimshian Integration in Laotian Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 13,400,062 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Tsimshian within Laotian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.836. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Laotians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 1.963% in Tsimshian. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Laotians corresponds to an increase of 1,963.2 Tsimshian.
Laotian vs Tsimshian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Laotian and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($59,351 compared to $48,836, a difference of 21.5%), per capita income ($47,041 compared to $40,344, a difference of 16.6%), and median earnings ($50,343 compared to $43,695, a difference of 15.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,369 compared to $54,649, a difference of 0.51%), median female earnings ($42,133 compared to $39,530, a difference of 6.6%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($104,993 compared to $97,809, a difference of 7.3%).
Income Metric | Laotian | Tsimshian |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $47,041 | Tragic $40,344 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $112,859 | Fair $101,543 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $94,990 | Fair $83,346 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $50,343 | Tragic $43,695 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $59,351 | Tragic $48,836 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $42,133 | Average $39,530 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $54,369 | Exceptional $54,649 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $104,993 | Excellent $97,809 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $111,051 | Poor $96,783 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $66,306 | Tragic $58,202 |
Wage/Income Gap | Poor 26.4% | Exceptional 23.9% |
Laotian vs Tsimshian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Laotian and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.0% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 57.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.3% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 30.6%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (14.5% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 26.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 5 (14.7% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 0.080%), single mother poverty (27.0% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 0.48%), and single female poverty (19.3% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 0.80%).
Poverty Metric | Laotian | Tsimshian |
Poverty | Exceptional 11.6% | Tragic 13.0% |
Families | Exceptional 8.1% | Good 8.8% |
Males | Exceptional 10.5% | Tragic 12.8% |
Females | Exceptional 12.6% | Good 13.1% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 19.2% | Tragic 21.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 12.2% | Exceptional 12.7% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 14.7% | Exceptional 14.7% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.3% | Exceptional 14.1% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.3% | Average 16.4% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.5% | Exceptional 11.5% |
Single Males | Exceptional 11.9% | Exceptional 11.1% |
Single Females | Exceptional 19.3% | Exceptional 19.1% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.1% | Exceptional 12.7% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 27.0% | Exceptional 26.8% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 5.9% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Good 10.6% | Good 10.8% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Fair 12.3% | Tragic 16.1% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 10.0% | Tragic 15.7% |
Laotian vs Tsimshian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Laotian and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 163.5%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.0% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 79.3%), and male unemployment (5.2% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 62.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.2% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 0.59%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 0.91%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.5% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 1.2%).
Unemployment Metric | Laotian | Tsimshian |
Unemployment | Good 5.2% | Tragic 7.2% |
Males | Good 5.2% | Tragic 8.5% |
Females | Average 5.3% | Fair 5.4% |
Youth < 25 | Good 11.5% | Tragic 16.5% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Excellent 17.2% | Good 17.3% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 10.0% | Tragic 18.0% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Excellent 6.5% | Tragic 8.0% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.2% | Tragic 13.8% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Excellent 4.6% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Excellent 4.4% | Good 4.5% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Good 4.8% | Tragic 5.2% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Good 4.8% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Average 5.4% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Seniors > 65 | Poor 5.2% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 8.2% | Tragic 10.5% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.5% | Exceptional 6.6% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 7.9% | Tragic 11.4% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 5.2% | Poor 5.6% |
Laotian vs Tsimshian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Laotian and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.9% compared to 37.4%, a difference of 7.1%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.9% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 7.0%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 0.75%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.6% compared to 78.7%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 1.4%).
Labor Participation Metric | Laotian | Tsimshian |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 65.8% | Tragic 64.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Average 79.6% | Tragic 78.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 34.9% | Excellent 37.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 74.1% | Tragic 72.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Poor 84.4% | Exceptional 88.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Average 84.7% | Exceptional 85.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Poor 84.2% | Tragic 83.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Good 82.9% | Tragic 77.4% |
Laotian vs Tsimshian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Laotian and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (28.5% compared to 42.2%, a difference of 48.1%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 29.6%), and divorced or separated (11.2% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 19.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.26 compared to 3.25, a difference of 0.29%), currently married (47.4% compared to 47.7%, a difference of 0.56%), and married-couple households (48.4% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 0.74%).
Family Structure Metric | Laotian | Tsimshian |
Family Households | Exceptional 65.8% | Exceptional 67.1% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.5% | Tragic 27.0% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 48.4% | Exceptional 48.7% |
Average Family Size | Excellent 3.26 | Excellent 3.25 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.2% | Tragic 2.9% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.8% | Excellent 6.0% |
Currently Married | Excellent 47.4% | Exceptional 47.7% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.2% | Tragic 13.3% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 28.5% | Tragic 42.2% |
Laotian vs Tsimshian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Laotian and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 19.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 12.7%), and no vehicles in household (9.1% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 5.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 0.41%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.6% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 3.4%), and no vehicles in household (9.1% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 5.5%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Laotian | Tsimshian |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 9.1% | Exceptional 8.6% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 91.0% | Exceptional 91.4% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 58.6% | Exceptional 56.7% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 21.5% | Fair 19.1% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.4% | Fair 6.2% |
Laotian vs Tsimshian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Laotian and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.2% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 64.9%), doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 64.2%), and master's degree (17.0% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 49.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (86.5% compared to 86.6%, a difference of 0.22%), nursery school (97.8% compared to 98.9%, a difference of 1.1%), and kindergarten (97.8% compared to 98.8%, a difference of 1.1%).
Education Level Metric | Laotian | Tsimshian |
No Schooling Completed | Poor 2.2% | Exceptional 1.7% |
Nursery School | Tragic 97.8% | Exceptional 98.9% |
Kindergarten | Poor 97.8% | Exceptional 98.8% |
1st Grade | Poor 97.8% | Exceptional 98.8% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 97.7% | Exceptional 98.8% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 97.6% | Exceptional 98.8% |
4th Grade | Tragic 97.3% | Exceptional 98.6% |
5th Grade | Poor 97.1% | Exceptional 98.4% |
6th Grade | Poor 96.8% | Exceptional 98.3% |
7th Grade | Tragic 95.7% | Exceptional 97.8% |
8th Grade | Tragic 95.4% | Exceptional 99.0% |
9th Grade | Fair 94.6% | Exceptional 97.0% |
10th Grade | Fair 93.6% | Exceptional 95.6% |
11th Grade | Average 92.6% | Exceptional 94.4% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Good 91.3% | Exceptional 92.9% |
High School Diploma | Good 89.3% | Exceptional 91.3% |
GED/Equivalency | Excellent 86.5% | Excellent 86.6% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 68.5% | Poor 64.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 62.8% | Poor 57.9% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 49.9% | Tragic 38.6% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 42.0% | Tragic 28.8% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 17.0% | Tragic 11.4% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 5.2% | Tragic 3.2% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.3% | Tragic 1.4% |
Laotian vs Tsimshian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Laotian and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 96.6%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.1% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 65.4%), and hearing disability (2.9% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 62.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 0.010%), self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 9.4%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.2% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 18.7%).
Disability Metric | Laotian | Tsimshian |
Disability | Exceptional 11.0% | Tragic 16.1% |
Males | Exceptional 10.6% | Tragic 15.6% |
Females | Exceptional 11.4% | Tragic 16.8% |
Age | Under 5 years | Good 1.2% | Tragic 2.4% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Tragic 7.9% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 6.2% | Tragic 7.4% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.1% | Tragic 16.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 22.3% | Tragic 32.9% |
Age | Over 75 years | Poor 47.9% | Tragic 59.2% |
Vision | Exceptional 2.0% | Tragic 3.2% |
Hearing | Excellent 2.9% | Tragic 4.7% |
Cognitive | Average 17.3% | Average 17.3% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.7% | Tragic 8.8% |
Self-Care | Excellent 2.4% | Tragic 2.6% |