Guyanese vs Tsimshian Community Comparison
COMPARE
Guyanese
Tsimshian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Guyanese
Tsimshian
2,059
SOCIAL INDEX
18.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
273rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
4,927
SOCIAL INDEX
46.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
189th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Tsimshian Integration in Guyanese Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 10,352,932 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Tsimshian within Guyanese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.496. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Guyanese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.038% in Tsimshian. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Guyanese corresponds to an increase of 37.6 Tsimshian.
Guyanese vs Tsimshian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Guyanese and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (18.3% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 30.4%), median family income ($93,373 compared to $101,543, a difference of 8.7%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($89,940 compared to $97,809, a difference of 8.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($55,210 compared to $54,649, a difference of 1.0%), per capita income ($40,949 compared to $40,344, a difference of 1.5%), and median household income ($80,734 compared to $83,346, a difference of 3.2%).
Income Metric | Guyanese | Tsimshian |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $40,949 | Tragic $40,344 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $93,373 | Fair $101,543 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $80,734 | Fair $83,346 |
Median Earnings | Fair $45,470 | Tragic $43,695 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $50,613 | Tragic $48,836 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $40,973 | Average $39,530 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $55,210 | Exceptional $54,649 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $89,940 | Excellent $97,809 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $90,966 | Poor $96,783 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $56,351 | Tragic $58,202 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 18.3% | Exceptional 23.9% |
Guyanese vs Tsimshian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Guyanese and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among girls under 16 (19.4% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 68.7%), child poverty under the age of 16 (19.3% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 37.4%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (19.7% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 33.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (16.1% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 0.30%), male poverty (13.3% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 3.7%), and receiving food stamps (16.7% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 6.2%).
Poverty Metric | Guyanese | Tsimshian |
Poverty | Tragic 14.5% | Tragic 13.0% |
Families | Tragic 11.2% | Good 8.8% |
Males | Tragic 13.3% | Tragic 12.8% |
Females | Tragic 15.6% | Good 13.1% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 19.4% | Tragic 21.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 14.2% | Exceptional 12.7% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 19.7% | Exceptional 14.7% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.3% | Exceptional 14.1% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 19.6% | Average 16.4% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 19.4% | Exceptional 11.5% |
Single Males | Average 12.8% | Exceptional 11.1% |
Single Females | Average 21.0% | Exceptional 19.1% |
Single Fathers | Average 16.3% | Exceptional 12.7% |
Single Mothers | Poor 29.8% | Exceptional 26.8% |
Married Couples | Tragic 6.5% | Tragic 5.9% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 14.4% | Good 10.8% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 16.1% | Tragic 16.1% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 16.7% | Tragic 15.7% |
Guyanese vs Tsimshian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Guyanese and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (7.2% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 91.6%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (24.8% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 43.2%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.6% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 38.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (15.9% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 3.7%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.9% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 4.6%), and unemployment (6.9% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 4.7%).
Unemployment Metric | Guyanese | Tsimshian |
Unemployment | Tragic 6.9% | Tragic 7.2% |
Males | Tragic 7.1% | Tragic 8.5% |
Females | Tragic 6.7% | Fair 5.4% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 15.9% | Tragic 16.5% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 24.8% | Good 17.3% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 14.0% | Tragic 18.0% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 8.5% | Tragic 8.0% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 7.2% | Tragic 13.8% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.9% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 5.6% | Good 4.5% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.7% | Tragic 5.2% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.5% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.6% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.6% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.6% | Tragic 10.5% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 8.2% | Exceptional 6.6% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Fair 9.1% | Tragic 11.4% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 6.6% | Poor 5.6% |
Guyanese vs Tsimshian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Guyanese and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (27.4% compared to 37.4%, a difference of 36.1%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.0% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 6.8%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.5% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (83.8% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 0.25%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.1% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 0.61%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.1% compared to 78.7%, a difference of 0.74%).
Labor Participation Metric | Guyanese | Tsimshian |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 64.1% | Tragic 64.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 78.1% | Tragic 78.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 27.4% | Excellent 37.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 69.2% | Tragic 72.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 83.0% | Exceptional 88.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 83.8% | Exceptional 85.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 83.8% | Tragic 83.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 81.5% | Tragic 77.4% |
Guyanese vs Tsimshian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Guyanese and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 35.2%), single mother households (7.6% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 26.5%), and births to unmarried women (35.2% compared to 42.2%, a difference of 19.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.3% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 2.8%), family households (65.3% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 2.8%), and average family size (3.40 compared to 3.25, a difference of 4.6%).
Family Structure Metric | Guyanese | Tsimshian |
Family Households | Exceptional 65.3% | Exceptional 67.1% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.3% | Tragic 27.0% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 41.4% | Exceptional 48.7% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.40 | Excellent 3.25 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.1% | Tragic 2.9% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.6% | Excellent 6.0% |
Currently Married | Tragic 41.6% | Exceptional 47.7% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.5% | Tragic 13.3% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 35.2% | Tragic 42.2% |
Guyanese vs Tsimshian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Guyanese and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (29.3% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 241.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (3.5% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 76.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (11.5% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 66.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (70.8% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 29.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (35.4% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 60.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (11.5% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 66.7%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Guyanese | Tsimshian |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 29.3% | Exceptional 8.6% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 70.8% | Exceptional 91.4% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 35.4% | Exceptional 56.7% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 11.5% | Fair 19.1% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 3.5% | Fair 6.2% |
Guyanese vs Tsimshian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Guyanese and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.0% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 83.3%), master's degree (13.7% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 20.4%), and bachelor's degree (34.5% compared to 28.8%, a difference of 19.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 1.8%), nursery school (97.0% compared to 98.9%, a difference of 1.9%), and kindergarten (96.9% compared to 98.8%, a difference of 2.0%).
Education Level Metric | Guyanese | Tsimshian |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 3.0% | Exceptional 1.7% |
Nursery School | Tragic 97.0% | Exceptional 98.9% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 96.9% | Exceptional 98.8% |
1st Grade | Tragic 96.9% | Exceptional 98.8% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 96.8% | Exceptional 98.8% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 96.7% | Exceptional 98.8% |
4th Grade | Tragic 96.4% | Exceptional 98.6% |
5th Grade | Tragic 96.1% | Exceptional 98.4% |
6th Grade | Tragic 95.6% | Exceptional 98.3% |
7th Grade | Tragic 94.3% | Exceptional 97.8% |
8th Grade | Tragic 93.9% | Exceptional 99.0% |
9th Grade | Tragic 92.7% | Exceptional 97.0% |
10th Grade | Tragic 91.4% | Exceptional 95.6% |
11th Grade | Tragic 89.9% | Exceptional 94.4% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 88.3% | Exceptional 92.9% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 85.5% | Exceptional 91.3% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 81.3% | Excellent 86.6% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 59.0% | Poor 64.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 54.1% | Poor 57.9% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 42.3% | Tragic 38.6% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 34.5% | Tragic 28.8% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 13.7% | Tragic 11.4% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.8% | Tragic 3.2% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.4% | Tragic 1.4% |
Guyanese vs Tsimshian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Guyanese and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 137.4%), hearing disability (2.3% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 105.8%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.2% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 52.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.5% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 1.1%), self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 3.9%), and disability age over 75 (46.9% compared to 59.2%, a difference of 26.3%).
Disability Metric | Guyanese | Tsimshian |
Disability | Exceptional 11.3% | Tragic 16.1% |
Males | Exceptional 10.5% | Tragic 15.6% |
Females | Good 12.1% | Tragic 16.8% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.0% | Tragic 2.4% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.2% | Tragic 7.9% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.5% | Tragic 7.4% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Good 11.0% | Tragic 16.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Average 23.4% | Tragic 32.9% |
Age | Over 75 years | Excellent 46.9% | Tragic 59.2% |
Vision | Fair 2.2% | Tragic 3.2% |
Hearing | Exceptional 2.3% | Tragic 4.7% |
Cognitive | Poor 17.5% | Average 17.3% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 6.6% | Tragic 8.8% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.7% | Tragic 2.6% |