New Zealander vs Tsimshian Community Comparison
COMPARE
New Zealander
Tsimshian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
New Zealanders
Tsimshian
8,769
SOCIAL INDEX
85.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
50th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
4,927
SOCIAL INDEX
46.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
189th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Tsimshian Integration in New Zealander Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 11,471,222 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Tsimshian within New Zealander communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.577. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in New Zealanders within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.255% in Tsimshian. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 New Zealanders corresponds to an increase of 255.1 Tsimshian.
New Zealander vs Tsimshian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($50,575 compared to $40,344, a difference of 25.4%), median male earnings ($61,199 compared to $48,836, a difference of 25.3%), and median earnings ($51,246 compared to $43,695, a difference of 17.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,294 compared to $54,649, a difference of 2.5%), median female earnings ($42,446 compared to $39,530, a difference of 7.4%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($105,085 compared to $97,809, a difference of 7.4%).
Income Metric | New Zealander | Tsimshian |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $50,575 | Tragic $40,344 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $115,230 | Fair $101,543 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $95,146 | Fair $83,346 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $51,246 | Tragic $43,695 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $61,199 | Tragic $48,836 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $42,446 | Average $39,530 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $53,294 | Exceptional $54,649 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $105,085 | Excellent $97,809 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $111,286 | Poor $96,783 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $67,333 | Tragic $58,202 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.7% | Exceptional 23.9% |
New Zealander vs Tsimshian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.9% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 58.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 37.0%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (15.6% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 35.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.7% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 2.2%), female poverty (12.7% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 2.9%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.1% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 3.0%).
Poverty Metric | New Zealander | Tsimshian |
Poverty | Excellent 11.7% | Tragic 13.0% |
Families | Exceptional 8.1% | Good 8.8% |
Males | Excellent 10.8% | Tragic 12.8% |
Females | Exceptional 12.7% | Good 13.1% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 21.7% | Tragic 21.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Excellent 13.1% | Exceptional 12.7% |
Children Under 5 years | Good 16.6% | Exceptional 14.7% |
Children Under 16 years | Excellent 15.3% | Exceptional 14.1% |
Boys Under 16 years | Excellent 15.7% | Average 16.4% |
Girls Under 16 years | Excellent 15.6% | Exceptional 11.5% |
Single Males | Poor 13.2% | Exceptional 11.1% |
Single Females | Average 21.0% | Exceptional 19.1% |
Single Fathers | Poor 16.6% | Exceptional 12.7% |
Single Mothers | Average 29.1% | Exceptional 26.8% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 5.9% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 10.0% | Good 10.8% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Excellent 11.7% | Tragic 16.1% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.9% | Tragic 15.7% |
New Zealander vs Tsimshian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 159.1%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.9% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 80.7%), and male unemployment (5.0% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 68.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 1.6%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.8% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 3.4%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 5.6%).
Unemployment Metric | New Zealander | Tsimshian |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.9% | Tragic 7.2% |
Males | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 8.5% |
Females | Exceptional 5.0% | Fair 5.4% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.2% | Tragic 16.5% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.8% | Good 17.3% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.9% | Tragic 18.0% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.0% | Tragic 8.0% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Excellent 5.3% | Tragic 13.8% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.5% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Good 4.5% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 5.2% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Poor 4.9% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Good 5.3% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Seniors > 65 | Excellent 5.1% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 8.1% | Tragic 10.5% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 7.2% | Exceptional 6.6% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.6% | Tragic 11.4% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Good 5.3% | Poor 5.6% |
New Zealander vs Tsimshian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (82.6% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 6.7%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 4.3%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.2% compared to 72.3%, a difference of 4.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.1% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 0.71%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 0.99%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 78.7%, a difference of 1.3%).
Labor Participation Metric | New Zealander | Tsimshian |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 65.7% | Tragic 64.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Good 79.7% | Tragic 78.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.0% | Excellent 37.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Good 75.2% | Tragic 72.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 85.0% | Exceptional 88.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Excellent 85.0% | Exceptional 85.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Poor 84.1% | Tragic 83.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Fair 82.6% | Tragic 77.4% |
New Zealander vs Tsimshian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.3% compared to 42.2%, a difference of 38.9%), single father households (2.1% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 38.2%), and divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 12.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.1% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 0.23%), currently married (47.4% compared to 47.7%, a difference of 0.69%), and average family size (3.15 compared to 3.25, a difference of 3.0%).
Family Structure Metric | New Zealander | Tsimshian |
Family Households | Tragic 62.9% | Exceptional 67.1% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 27.1% | Tragic 27.0% |
Married-couple Households | Excellent 47.2% | Exceptional 48.7% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.15 | Excellent 3.25 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.1% | Tragic 2.9% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.6% | Excellent 6.0% |
Currently Married | Excellent 47.4% | Exceptional 47.7% |
Divorced or Separated | Excellent 11.9% | Tragic 13.3% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Excellent 30.3% | Tragic 42.2% |
New Zealander vs Tsimshian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 18.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.4% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 6.7%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (56.7% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 0.020%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 1.5%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 5.3%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | New Zealander | Tsimshian |
No Vehicles Available | Good 10.2% | Exceptional 8.6% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Good 90.1% | Exceptional 91.4% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 56.7% | Exceptional 56.7% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 20.4% | Fair 19.1% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Good 6.5% | Fair 6.2% |
New Zealander vs Tsimshian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.0% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 87.2%), doctorate degree (2.5% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 78.2%), and master's degree (18.3% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 60.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (92.8% compared to 92.9%, a difference of 0.040%), high school diploma (91.1% compared to 91.3%, a difference of 0.23%), and nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.9%, a difference of 0.45%).
Education Level Metric | New Zealander | Tsimshian |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.7% | Exceptional 1.7% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.9% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.8% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.8% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.8% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.8% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Exceptional 98.6% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Exceptional 98.4% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.7% | Exceptional 98.3% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.8% | Exceptional 97.8% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.6% | Exceptional 99.0% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.9% | Exceptional 97.0% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.0% | Exceptional 95.6% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 94.0% | Exceptional 94.4% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 92.8% | Exceptional 92.9% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 91.1% | Exceptional 91.3% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 88.0% | Excellent 86.6% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 70.2% | Poor 64.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 64.6% | Poor 57.9% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 51.8% | Tragic 38.6% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 44.0% | Tragic 28.8% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 18.3% | Tragic 11.4% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 6.0% | Tragic 3.2% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.5% | Tragic 1.4% |
New Zealander vs Tsimshian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 101.0%), vision disability (2.1% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 52.6%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.0% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 52.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.4% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 0.93%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.0% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 5.5%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 14.1%).
Disability Metric | New Zealander | Tsimshian |
Disability | Excellent 11.5% | Tragic 16.1% |
Males | Average 11.2% | Tragic 15.6% |
Females | Exceptional 11.7% | Tragic 16.8% |
Age | Under 5 years | Excellent 1.2% | Tragic 2.4% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.4% | Tragic 7.9% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.0% | Tragic 7.4% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Good 11.0% | Tragic 16.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Good 22.9% | Tragic 32.9% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 46.2% | Tragic 59.2% |
Vision | Excellent 2.1% | Tragic 3.2% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.2% | Tragic 4.7% |
Cognitive | Fair 17.4% | Average 17.3% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.8% | Tragic 8.8% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.3% | Tragic 2.6% |