New Zealander vs Tsimshian Community Comparison

COMPARE

New Zealander
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Tsimshian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

New Zealanders

Tsimshian

Excellent
Average
8,769
SOCIAL INDEX
85.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
50th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
4,927
SOCIAL INDEX
46.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
189th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Tsimshian Integration in New Zealander Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 11,471,222 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Tsimshian within New Zealander communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.577. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in New Zealanders within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.255% in Tsimshian. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 New Zealanders corresponds to an increase of 255.1 Tsimshian.
New Zealander Integration in Tsimshian Communities

New Zealander vs Tsimshian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($50,575 compared to $40,344, a difference of 25.4%), median male earnings ($61,199 compared to $48,836, a difference of 25.3%), and median earnings ($51,246 compared to $43,695, a difference of 17.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,294 compared to $54,649, a difference of 2.5%), median female earnings ($42,446 compared to $39,530, a difference of 7.4%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($105,085 compared to $97,809, a difference of 7.4%).
New Zealander vs Tsimshian Income
Income MetricNew ZealanderTsimshian
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$50,575
Tragic
$40,344
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$115,230
Fair
$101,543
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$95,146
Fair
$83,346
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$51,246
Tragic
$43,695
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$61,199
Tragic
$48,836
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$42,446
Average
$39,530
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$53,294
Exceptional
$54,649
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$105,085
Excellent
$97,809
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$111,286
Poor
$96,783
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$67,333
Tragic
$58,202
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.7%
Exceptional
23.9%

New Zealander vs Tsimshian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.9% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 58.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 37.0%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (15.6% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 35.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.7% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 2.2%), female poverty (12.7% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 2.9%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.1% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 3.0%).
New Zealander vs Tsimshian Poverty
Poverty MetricNew ZealanderTsimshian
Poverty
Excellent
11.7%
Tragic
13.0%
Families
Exceptional
8.1%
Good
8.8%
Males
Excellent
10.8%
Tragic
12.8%
Females
Exceptional
12.7%
Good
13.1%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
21.7%
Tragic
21.2%
Females 25 to 34 years
Excellent
13.1%
Exceptional
12.7%
Children Under 5 years
Good
16.6%
Exceptional
14.7%
Children Under 16 years
Excellent
15.3%
Exceptional
14.1%
Boys Under 16 years
Excellent
15.7%
Average
16.4%
Girls Under 16 years
Excellent
15.6%
Exceptional
11.5%
Single Males
Poor
13.2%
Exceptional
11.1%
Single Females
Average
21.0%
Exceptional
19.1%
Single Fathers
Poor
16.6%
Exceptional
12.7%
Single Mothers
Average
29.1%
Exceptional
26.8%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
5.9%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
10.0%
Good
10.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Excellent
11.7%
Tragic
16.1%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.9%
Tragic
15.7%

New Zealander vs Tsimshian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 159.1%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.9% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 80.7%), and male unemployment (5.0% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 68.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 1.6%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.8% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 3.4%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 5.6%).
New Zealander vs Tsimshian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricNew ZealanderTsimshian
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
7.2%
Males
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
8.5%
Females
Exceptional
5.0%
Fair
5.4%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.2%
Tragic
16.5%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.8%
Good
17.3%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.9%
Tragic
18.0%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.0%
Tragic
8.0%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Excellent
5.3%
Tragic
13.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Tragic
6.2%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Good
4.5%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
5.2%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Poor
4.9%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Good
5.3%
Exceptional
4.6%
Seniors > 65
Excellent
5.1%
Exceptional
4.5%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
8.1%
Tragic
10.5%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
7.2%
Exceptional
6.6%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.6%
Tragic
11.4%
Women w/ Children < 18
Good
5.3%
Poor
5.6%

New Zealander vs Tsimshian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (82.6% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 6.7%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 4.3%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.2% compared to 72.3%, a difference of 4.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.1% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 0.71%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 0.99%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 78.7%, a difference of 1.3%).
New Zealander vs Tsimshian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricNew ZealanderTsimshian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
65.7%
Tragic
64.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Good
79.7%
Tragic
78.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.0%
Excellent
37.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Good
75.2%
Tragic
72.3%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.0%
Exceptional
88.7%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Excellent
85.0%
Exceptional
85.8%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Poor
84.1%
Tragic
83.5%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Fair
82.6%
Tragic
77.4%

New Zealander vs Tsimshian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.3% compared to 42.2%, a difference of 38.9%), single father households (2.1% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 38.2%), and divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 12.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.1% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 0.23%), currently married (47.4% compared to 47.7%, a difference of 0.69%), and average family size (3.15 compared to 3.25, a difference of 3.0%).
New Zealander vs Tsimshian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricNew ZealanderTsimshian
Family Households
Tragic
62.9%
Exceptional
67.1%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
27.1%
Tragic
27.0%
Married-couple Households
Excellent
47.2%
Exceptional
48.7%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.15
Excellent
3.25
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.1%
Tragic
2.9%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.6%
Excellent
6.0%
Currently Married
Excellent
47.4%
Exceptional
47.7%
Divorced or Separated
Excellent
11.9%
Tragic
13.3%
Births to Unmarried Women
Excellent
30.3%
Tragic
42.2%

New Zealander vs Tsimshian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 18.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.4% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 6.7%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (56.7% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 0.020%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 1.5%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 5.3%).
New Zealander vs Tsimshian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricNew ZealanderTsimshian
No Vehicles Available
Good
10.2%
Exceptional
8.6%
1+ Vehicles Available
Good
90.1%
Exceptional
91.4%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
56.7%
Exceptional
56.7%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
20.4%
Fair
19.1%
4+ Vehicles Available
Good
6.5%
Fair
6.2%

New Zealander vs Tsimshian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.0% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 87.2%), doctorate degree (2.5% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 78.2%), and master's degree (18.3% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 60.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (92.8% compared to 92.9%, a difference of 0.040%), high school diploma (91.1% compared to 91.3%, a difference of 0.23%), and nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.9%, a difference of 0.45%).
New Zealander vs Tsimshian Education Level
Education Level MetricNew ZealanderTsimshian
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.7%
Exceptional
1.7%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.9%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.8%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.8%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.8%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.8%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Exceptional
98.6%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Exceptional
98.4%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.7%
Exceptional
98.3%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.8%
Exceptional
97.8%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.6%
Exceptional
99.0%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.9%
Exceptional
97.0%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.0%
Exceptional
95.6%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.0%
Exceptional
94.4%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.8%
Exceptional
92.9%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.1%
Exceptional
91.3%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.0%
Excellent
86.6%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
70.2%
Poor
64.3%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
64.6%
Poor
57.9%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
51.8%
Tragic
38.6%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
44.0%
Tragic
28.8%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
18.3%
Tragic
11.4%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
6.0%
Tragic
3.2%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.5%
Tragic
1.4%

New Zealander vs Tsimshian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 101.0%), vision disability (2.1% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 52.6%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.0% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 52.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.4% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 0.93%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.0% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 5.5%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 14.1%).
New Zealander vs Tsimshian Disability
Disability MetricNew ZealanderTsimshian
Disability
Excellent
11.5%
Tragic
16.1%
Males
Average
11.2%
Tragic
15.6%
Females
Exceptional
11.7%
Tragic
16.8%
Age | Under 5 years
Excellent
1.2%
Tragic
2.4%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.4%
Tragic
7.9%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.0%
Tragic
7.4%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Good
11.0%
Tragic
16.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Good
22.9%
Tragic
32.9%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.2%
Tragic
59.2%
Vision
Excellent
2.1%
Tragic
3.2%
Hearing
Tragic
3.2%
Tragic
4.7%
Cognitive
Fair
17.4%
Average
17.3%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.8%
Tragic
8.8%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.3%
Tragic
2.6%