Lumbee vs Tsimshian Community Comparison
COMPARE
Lumbee
Tsimshian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Lumbee
Tsimshian
2,002
SOCIAL INDEX
17.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
276th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
4,927
SOCIAL INDEX
46.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
189th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Tsimshian Integration in Lumbee Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 6,911,717 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Tsimshian within Lumbee communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 1.000. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Lumbee within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.232% in Tsimshian. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Lumbee corresponds to an increase of 231.6 Tsimshian.
Lumbee vs Tsimshian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($60,305 compared to $97,809, a difference of 62.2%), householder income under 25 years ($34,584 compared to $54,649, a difference of 58.0%), and median household income ($54,644 compared to $83,346, a difference of 52.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (21.3% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 11.9%), median male earnings ($41,715 compared to $48,836, a difference of 17.1%), and median earnings ($36,876 compared to $43,695, a difference of 18.5%).
Income Metric | Lumbee | Tsimshian |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $29,845 | Tragic $40,344 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $68,679 | Fair $101,543 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $54,644 | Fair $83,346 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $36,876 | Tragic $43,695 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $41,715 | Tragic $48,836 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $32,500 | Average $39,530 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $34,584 | Exceptional $54,649 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $60,305 | Excellent $97,809 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $65,113 | Poor $96,783 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $40,550 | Tragic $58,202 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 21.3% | Exceptional 23.9% |
Lumbee vs Tsimshian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among girls under 16 (30.7% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 167.6%), single male poverty (25.2% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 127.0%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (33.3% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 126.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (19.7% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 22.8%), married-couple family poverty (8.3% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 41.5%), and receiving food stamps (22.9% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 45.7%).
Poverty Metric | Lumbee | Tsimshian |
Poverty | Tragic 21.9% | Tragic 13.0% |
Families | Tragic 17.0% | Good 8.8% |
Males | Tragic 20.2% | Tragic 12.8% |
Females | Tragic 23.5% | Good 13.1% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 31.1% | Tragic 21.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 26.3% | Exceptional 12.7% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 33.3% | Exceptional 14.7% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 31.0% | Exceptional 14.1% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 31.9% | Average 16.4% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 30.7% | Exceptional 11.5% |
Single Males | Tragic 25.2% | Exceptional 11.1% |
Single Females | Tragic 33.0% | Exceptional 19.1% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 28.5% | Exceptional 12.7% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 43.2% | Exceptional 26.8% |
Married Couples | Tragic 8.3% | Tragic 5.9% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 18.1% | Good 10.8% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 19.7% | Tragic 16.1% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 22.9% | Tragic 15.7% |
Lumbee vs Tsimshian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.8% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 108.8%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (7.1% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 95.1%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (12.0% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 49.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.6% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 2.4%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.8% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 3.7%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.6% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 4.0%).
Unemployment Metric | Lumbee | Tsimshian |
Unemployment | Tragic 6.4% | Tragic 7.2% |
Males | Tragic 6.9% | Tragic 8.5% |
Females | Tragic 5.9% | Fair 5.4% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 13.3% | Tragic 16.5% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 19.1% | Good 17.3% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 12.0% | Tragic 18.0% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 11.2% | Tragic 8.0% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 7.1% | Tragic 13.8% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.4% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 4.6% | Good 4.5% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Fair 4.9% | Tragic 5.2% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.8% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.6% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 13.5% | Tragic 10.5% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 13.8% | Exceptional 6.6% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.3% | Tragic 11.4% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 7.1% | Poor 5.6% |
Lumbee vs Tsimshian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.0% compared to 37.4%, a difference of 20.6%), in labor force | age > 16 (56.8% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 13.6%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (78.3% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 13.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (75.6% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 2.4%), in labor force | age 35-44 (77.0% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 8.5%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (65.5% compared to 72.3%, a difference of 10.3%).
Labor Participation Metric | Lumbee | Tsimshian |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 56.8% | Tragic 64.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 70.6% | Tragic 78.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 31.0% | Excellent 37.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 65.5% | Tragic 72.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 78.3% | Exceptional 88.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 77.3% | Exceptional 85.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 77.0% | Tragic 83.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 75.6% | Tragic 77.4% |
Lumbee vs Tsimshian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (9.1% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 51.4%), married-couple households (39.6% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 23.1%), and currently married (39.8% compared to 47.7%, a difference of 19.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.32 compared to 3.25, a difference of 2.2%), family households with children (26.3% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 2.9%), and single father households (2.8% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 4.0%).
Family Structure Metric | Lumbee | Tsimshian |
Family Households | Tragic 63.1% | Exceptional 67.1% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.3% | Tragic 27.0% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 39.6% | Exceptional 48.7% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.32 | Excellent 3.25 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.8% | Tragic 2.9% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 9.1% | Excellent 6.0% |
Currently Married | Tragic 39.8% | Exceptional 47.7% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 12.7% | Tragic 13.3% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 48.2% | Tragic 42.2% |
Lumbee vs Tsimshian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 42.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.1% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 21.3%), and no vehicles in household (10.3% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 20.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (55.9% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 1.4%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.7% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 1.9%), and no vehicles in household (10.3% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 20.4%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Lumbee | Tsimshian |
No Vehicles Available | Average 10.3% | Exceptional 8.6% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Average 89.7% | Exceptional 91.4% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Good 55.9% | Exceptional 56.7% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 23.1% | Fair 19.1% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.8% | Fair 6.2% |
Lumbee vs Tsimshian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (2.5% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 29.2%), doctorate degree (1.1% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 29.0%), and master's degree (9.3% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 23.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.9%, a difference of 0.34%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.8%, a difference of 0.38%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.8%, a difference of 0.38%).
Education Level Metric | Lumbee | Tsimshian |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.5% | Exceptional 1.7% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.9% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.8% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.8% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.8% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.8% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Exceptional 98.6% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.8% | Exceptional 98.4% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Exceptional 98.3% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.6% | Exceptional 97.8% |
8th Grade | Excellent 96.0% | Exceptional 99.0% |
9th Grade | Tragic 94.4% | Exceptional 97.0% |
10th Grade | Tragic 91.7% | Exceptional 95.6% |
11th Grade | Tragic 88.9% | Exceptional 94.4% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 85.7% | Exceptional 92.9% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 83.6% | Exceptional 91.3% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 80.0% | Excellent 86.6% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 54.2% | Poor 64.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 48.9% | Poor 57.9% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 34.1% | Tragic 38.6% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 24.8% | Tragic 28.8% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 9.3% | Tragic 11.4% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 2.5% | Tragic 3.2% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.1% | Tragic 1.4% |
Lumbee vs Tsimshian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 78.7%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.2% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 27.0%), and hearing disability (4.1% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 14.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (32.7% compared to 32.9%, a difference of 0.53%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.4% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 0.64%), and male disability (15.2% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 2.4%).
Disability Metric | Lumbee | Tsimshian |
Disability | Tragic 15.5% | Tragic 16.1% |
Males | Tragic 15.2% | Tragic 15.6% |
Females | Tragic 15.8% | Tragic 16.8% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.3% | Tragic 2.4% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.2% | Tragic 7.9% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.4% | Tragic 7.4% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 17.6% | Tragic 16.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 32.7% | Tragic 32.9% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 56.2% | Tragic 59.2% |
Vision | Tragic 3.4% | Tragic 3.2% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.1% | Tragic 4.7% |
Cognitive | Tragic 19.1% | Average 17.3% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 9.5% | Tragic 8.8% |
Self-Care | Tragic 3.0% | Tragic 2.6% |