Argentinean vs Tsimshian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Argentinean
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Tsimshian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Argentineans

Tsimshian

Good
Average
8,055
SOCIAL INDEX
78.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
90th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
4,927
SOCIAL INDEX
46.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
189th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Tsimshian Integration in Argentinean Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 13,249,717 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Tsimshian within Argentinean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.599. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Argentineans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.059% in Tsimshian. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Argentineans corresponds to an increase of 58.9 Tsimshian.
Argentinean Integration in Tsimshian Communities

Argentinean vs Tsimshian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($49,862 compared to $40,344, a difference of 23.6%), median male earnings ($60,117 compared to $48,836, a difference of 23.1%), and median earnings ($50,399 compared to $43,695, a difference of 15.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,154 compared to $54,649, a difference of 0.91%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($103,111 compared to $97,809, a difference of 5.4%), and median female earnings ($41,952 compared to $39,530, a difference of 6.1%).
Argentinean vs Tsimshian Income
Income MetricArgentineanTsimshian
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$49,862
Tragic
$40,344
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$112,665
Fair
$101,543
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$93,960
Fair
$83,346
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$50,399
Tragic
$43,695
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$60,117
Tragic
$48,836
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$41,952
Average
$39,530
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$54,154
Exceptional
$54,649
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$103,111
Excellent
$97,809
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$110,103
Poor
$96,783
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$65,246
Tragic
$58,202
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.0%
Exceptional
23.9%

Argentinean vs Tsimshian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.8% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 45.3%), child poverty among girls under 16 (14.7% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 27.7%), and single father poverty (15.8% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 24.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (19.1% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 0.010%), single mother poverty (27.2% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 1.4%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.5% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 1.6%).
Argentinean vs Tsimshian Poverty
Poverty MetricArgentineanTsimshian
Poverty
Excellent
11.7%
Tragic
13.0%
Families
Excellent
8.4%
Good
8.8%
Males
Exceptional
10.6%
Tragic
12.8%
Females
Excellent
12.8%
Good
13.1%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
18.4%
Tragic
21.2%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.5%
Exceptional
12.7%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
15.4%
Exceptional
14.7%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.6%
Exceptional
14.1%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.9%
Average
16.4%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.7%
Exceptional
11.5%
Single Males
Exceptional
11.9%
Exceptional
11.1%
Single Females
Exceptional
19.1%
Exceptional
19.1%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.8%
Exceptional
12.7%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
27.2%
Exceptional
26.8%
Married Couples
Good
5.1%
Tragic
5.9%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
11.7%
Good
10.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
13.4%
Tragic
16.1%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
10.8%
Tragic
15.7%

Argentinean vs Tsimshian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 161.1%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.2% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 76.5%), and male unemployment (5.0% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 67.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.3% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 2.7%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.0% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 3.6%), and female unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 3.9%).
Argentinean vs Tsimshian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricArgentineanTsimshian
Unemployment
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
7.2%
Males
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
8.5%
Females
Good
5.2%
Fair
5.4%
Youth < 25
Good
11.5%
Tragic
16.5%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Poor
18.0%
Good
17.3%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Good
10.2%
Tragic
18.0%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Fair
6.7%
Tragic
8.0%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Excellent
5.3%
Tragic
13.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
6.2%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Good
4.5%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Tragic
5.2%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.0%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Poor
5.4%
Exceptional
4.6%
Seniors > 65
Fair
5.2%
Exceptional
4.5%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.9%
Tragic
10.5%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
7.2%
Exceptional
6.6%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.6%
Tragic
11.4%
Women w/ Children < 18
Good
5.3%
Poor
5.6%

Argentinean vs Tsimshian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.3% compared to 37.4%, a difference of 12.2%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 7.6%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 4.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 0.82%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.1% compared to 72.3%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.6% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 1.3%).
Argentinean vs Tsimshian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricArgentineanTsimshian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
65.7%
Tragic
64.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.0%
Tragic
78.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
33.3%
Excellent
37.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
73.1%
Tragic
72.3%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Average
84.7%
Exceptional
88.7%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.1%
Exceptional
85.8%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Excellent
84.6%
Tragic
83.5%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.3%
Tragic
77.4%

Argentinean vs Tsimshian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.0% compared to 42.2%, a difference of 40.6%), single father households (2.1% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 34.7%), and divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 12.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.23 compared to 3.25, a difference of 0.68%), currently married (47.1% compared to 47.7%, a difference of 1.3%), and family households with children (27.6% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 2.2%).
Argentinean vs Tsimshian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricArgentineanTsimshian
Family Households
Exceptional
65.0%
Exceptional
67.1%
Family Households with Children
Good
27.6%
Tragic
27.0%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
47.5%
Exceptional
48.7%
Average Family Size
Average
3.23
Excellent
3.25
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.1%
Tragic
2.9%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.8%
Excellent
6.0%
Currently Married
Good
47.1%
Exceptional
47.7%
Divorced or Separated
Excellent
11.9%
Tragic
13.3%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
30.0%
Tragic
42.2%

Argentinean vs Tsimshian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.2% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 30.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.5% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 4.0%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (88.9% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 0.070%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 0.72%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (88.9% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 2.9%).
Argentinean vs Tsimshian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricArgentineanTsimshian
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
11.2%
Exceptional
8.6%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
88.9%
Exceptional
91.4%
2+ Vehicles Available
Poor
54.5%
Exceptional
56.7%
3+ Vehicles Available
Poor
18.9%
Fair
19.1%
4+ Vehicles Available
Fair
6.2%
Fair
6.2%

Argentinean vs Tsimshian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.9% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 86.3%), doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 62.4%), and master's degree (18.2% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 59.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (86.7% compared to 86.6%, a difference of 0.070%), nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.9%, a difference of 0.91%), and kindergarten (97.9% compared to 98.8%, a difference of 0.93%).
Argentinean vs Tsimshian Education Level
Education Level MetricArgentineanTsimshian
No Schooling Completed
Average
2.1%
Exceptional
1.7%
Nursery School
Average
98.0%
Exceptional
98.9%
Kindergarten
Average
97.9%
Exceptional
98.8%
1st Grade
Average
97.9%
Exceptional
98.8%
2nd Grade
Average
97.9%
Exceptional
98.8%
3rd Grade
Average
97.7%
Exceptional
98.8%
4th Grade
Fair
97.5%
Exceptional
98.6%
5th Grade
Fair
97.3%
Exceptional
98.4%
6th Grade
Fair
97.0%
Exceptional
98.3%
7th Grade
Fair
95.9%
Exceptional
97.8%
8th Grade
Fair
95.5%
Exceptional
99.0%
9th Grade
Fair
94.8%
Exceptional
97.0%
10th Grade
Average
93.7%
Exceptional
95.6%
11th Grade
Good
92.7%
Exceptional
94.4%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Excellent
91.6%
Exceptional
92.9%
High School Diploma
Good
89.5%
Exceptional
91.3%
GED/Equivalency
Excellent
86.7%
Excellent
86.6%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
68.4%
Poor
64.3%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
63.2%
Poor
57.9%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
51.2%
Tragic
38.6%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
43.3%
Tragic
28.8%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
18.2%
Tragic
11.4%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.9%
Tragic
3.2%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.3%
Tragic
1.4%

Argentinean vs Tsimshian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 102.5%), disability age 35 to 64 (9.4% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 78.3%), and hearing disability (2.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 71.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 4.1%), self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 14.4%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.8% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 28.0%).
Argentinean vs Tsimshian Disability
Disability MetricArgentineanTsimshian
Disability
Exceptional
10.6%
Tragic
16.1%
Males
Exceptional
10.1%
Tragic
15.6%
Females
Exceptional
11.0%
Tragic
16.8%
Age | Under 5 years
Excellent
1.2%
Tragic
2.4%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
7.9%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.8%
Tragic
7.4%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
9.4%
Tragic
16.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.2%
Tragic
32.9%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.2%
Tragic
59.2%
Vision
Exceptional
2.0%
Tragic
3.2%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.7%
Tragic
4.7%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.6%
Average
17.3%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.5%
Tragic
8.8%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.3%
Tragic
2.6%