Argentinean vs Tsimshian Community Comparison
COMPARE
Argentinean
Tsimshian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Argentineans
Tsimshian
8,055
SOCIAL INDEX
78.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
90th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
4,927
SOCIAL INDEX
46.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
189th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Tsimshian Integration in Argentinean Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 13,249,717 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Tsimshian within Argentinean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.599. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Argentineans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.059% in Tsimshian. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Argentineans corresponds to an increase of 58.9 Tsimshian.
Argentinean vs Tsimshian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($49,862 compared to $40,344, a difference of 23.6%), median male earnings ($60,117 compared to $48,836, a difference of 23.1%), and median earnings ($50,399 compared to $43,695, a difference of 15.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,154 compared to $54,649, a difference of 0.91%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($103,111 compared to $97,809, a difference of 5.4%), and median female earnings ($41,952 compared to $39,530, a difference of 6.1%).
Income Metric | Argentinean | Tsimshian |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $49,862 | Tragic $40,344 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $112,665 | Fair $101,543 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $93,960 | Fair $83,346 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $50,399 | Tragic $43,695 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $60,117 | Tragic $48,836 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $41,952 | Average $39,530 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $54,154 | Exceptional $54,649 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $103,111 | Excellent $97,809 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $110,103 | Poor $96,783 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $65,246 | Tragic $58,202 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.0% | Exceptional 23.9% |
Argentinean vs Tsimshian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.8% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 45.3%), child poverty among girls under 16 (14.7% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 27.7%), and single father poverty (15.8% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 24.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (19.1% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 0.010%), single mother poverty (27.2% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 1.4%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.5% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 1.6%).
Poverty Metric | Argentinean | Tsimshian |
Poverty | Excellent 11.7% | Tragic 13.0% |
Families | Excellent 8.4% | Good 8.8% |
Males | Exceptional 10.6% | Tragic 12.8% |
Females | Excellent 12.8% | Good 13.1% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 18.4% | Tragic 21.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 12.5% | Exceptional 12.7% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 15.4% | Exceptional 14.7% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.6% | Exceptional 14.1% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.9% | Average 16.4% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.7% | Exceptional 11.5% |
Single Males | Exceptional 11.9% | Exceptional 11.1% |
Single Females | Exceptional 19.1% | Exceptional 19.1% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.8% | Exceptional 12.7% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 27.2% | Exceptional 26.8% |
Married Couples | Good 5.1% | Tragic 5.9% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 11.7% | Good 10.8% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 13.4% | Tragic 16.1% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 10.8% | Tragic 15.7% |
Argentinean vs Tsimshian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 161.1%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.2% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 76.5%), and male unemployment (5.0% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 67.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.3% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 2.7%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.0% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 3.6%), and female unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 3.9%).
Unemployment Metric | Argentinean | Tsimshian |
Unemployment | Exceptional 5.1% | Tragic 7.2% |
Males | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 8.5% |
Females | Good 5.2% | Fair 5.4% |
Youth < 25 | Good 11.5% | Tragic 16.5% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Poor 18.0% | Good 17.3% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Good 10.2% | Tragic 18.0% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Fair 6.7% | Tragic 8.0% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Excellent 5.3% | Tragic 13.8% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Good 4.5% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.6% | Tragic 5.2% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.0% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Poor 5.4% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Seniors > 65 | Fair 5.2% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.9% | Tragic 10.5% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 7.2% | Exceptional 6.6% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.6% | Tragic 11.4% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Good 5.3% | Poor 5.6% |
Argentinean vs Tsimshian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.3% compared to 37.4%, a difference of 12.2%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 7.6%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 4.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 0.82%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.1% compared to 72.3%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.6% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 1.3%).
Labor Participation Metric | Argentinean | Tsimshian |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 65.7% | Tragic 64.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.0% | Tragic 78.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 33.3% | Excellent 37.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 73.1% | Tragic 72.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Average 84.7% | Exceptional 88.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.1% | Exceptional 85.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Excellent 84.6% | Tragic 83.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.3% | Tragic 77.4% |
Argentinean vs Tsimshian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.0% compared to 42.2%, a difference of 40.6%), single father households (2.1% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 34.7%), and divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 12.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.23 compared to 3.25, a difference of 0.68%), currently married (47.1% compared to 47.7%, a difference of 1.3%), and family households with children (27.6% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 2.2%).
Family Structure Metric | Argentinean | Tsimshian |
Family Households | Exceptional 65.0% | Exceptional 67.1% |
Family Households with Children | Good 27.6% | Tragic 27.0% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 47.5% | Exceptional 48.7% |
Average Family Size | Average 3.23 | Excellent 3.25 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.1% | Tragic 2.9% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.8% | Excellent 6.0% |
Currently Married | Good 47.1% | Exceptional 47.7% |
Divorced or Separated | Excellent 11.9% | Tragic 13.3% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 30.0% | Tragic 42.2% |
Argentinean vs Tsimshian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.2% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 30.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.5% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 4.0%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (88.9% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 0.070%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 0.72%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (88.9% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 2.9%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Argentinean | Tsimshian |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 11.2% | Exceptional 8.6% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 88.9% | Exceptional 91.4% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Poor 54.5% | Exceptional 56.7% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Poor 18.9% | Fair 19.1% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Fair 6.2% | Fair 6.2% |
Argentinean vs Tsimshian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.9% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 86.3%), doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 62.4%), and master's degree (18.2% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 59.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (86.7% compared to 86.6%, a difference of 0.070%), nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.9%, a difference of 0.91%), and kindergarten (97.9% compared to 98.8%, a difference of 0.93%).
Education Level Metric | Argentinean | Tsimshian |
No Schooling Completed | Average 2.1% | Exceptional 1.7% |
Nursery School | Average 98.0% | Exceptional 98.9% |
Kindergarten | Average 97.9% | Exceptional 98.8% |
1st Grade | Average 97.9% | Exceptional 98.8% |
2nd Grade | Average 97.9% | Exceptional 98.8% |
3rd Grade | Average 97.7% | Exceptional 98.8% |
4th Grade | Fair 97.5% | Exceptional 98.6% |
5th Grade | Fair 97.3% | Exceptional 98.4% |
6th Grade | Fair 97.0% | Exceptional 98.3% |
7th Grade | Fair 95.9% | Exceptional 97.8% |
8th Grade | Fair 95.5% | Exceptional 99.0% |
9th Grade | Fair 94.8% | Exceptional 97.0% |
10th Grade | Average 93.7% | Exceptional 95.6% |
11th Grade | Good 92.7% | Exceptional 94.4% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Excellent 91.6% | Exceptional 92.9% |
High School Diploma | Good 89.5% | Exceptional 91.3% |
GED/Equivalency | Excellent 86.7% | Excellent 86.6% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 68.4% | Poor 64.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 63.2% | Poor 57.9% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 51.2% | Tragic 38.6% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 43.3% | Tragic 28.8% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 18.2% | Tragic 11.4% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 5.9% | Tragic 3.2% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.3% | Tragic 1.4% |
Argentinean vs Tsimshian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 102.5%), disability age 35 to 64 (9.4% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 78.3%), and hearing disability (2.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 71.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 4.1%), self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 14.4%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.8% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 28.0%).
Disability Metric | Argentinean | Tsimshian |
Disability | Exceptional 10.6% | Tragic 16.1% |
Males | Exceptional 10.1% | Tragic 15.6% |
Females | Exceptional 11.0% | Tragic 16.8% |
Age | Under 5 years | Excellent 1.2% | Tragic 2.4% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Tragic 7.9% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.8% | Tragic 7.4% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 9.4% | Tragic 16.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 21.2% | Tragic 32.9% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 46.2% | Tragic 59.2% |
Vision | Exceptional 2.0% | Tragic 3.2% |
Hearing | Exceptional 2.7% | Tragic 4.7% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.6% | Average 17.3% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.5% | Tragic 8.8% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.3% | Tragic 2.6% |