Czechoslovakian vs Tsimshian Community Comparison
COMPARE
Czechoslovakian
Tsimshian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Czechoslovakians
Tsimshian
7,027
SOCIAL INDEX
67.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
132nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
4,927
SOCIAL INDEX
46.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
189th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Tsimshian Integration in Czechoslovakian Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 14,374,291 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Tsimshian within Czechoslovakian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.975. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Czechoslovakians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 1.542% in Tsimshian. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Czechoslovakians corresponds to an increase of 1,542.4 Tsimshian.
Czechoslovakian vs Tsimshian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (28.2% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 18.1%), median male earnings ($55,382 compared to $48,836, a difference of 13.4%), and per capita income ($43,806 compared to $40,344, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median family income ($103,273 compared to $101,543, a difference of 1.7%), median household income ($84,965 compared to $83,346, a difference of 1.9%), and median female earnings ($38,738 compared to $39,530, a difference of 2.1%).
Income Metric | Czechoslovakian | Tsimshian |
Per Capita Income | Average $43,806 | Tragic $40,344 |
Median Family Income | Average $103,273 | Fair $101,543 |
Median Household Income | Average $84,965 | Fair $83,346 |
Median Earnings | Average $46,658 | Tragic $43,695 |
Median Male Earnings | Good $55,382 | Tragic $48,836 |
Median Female Earnings | Poor $38,738 | Average $39,530 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $51,224 | Exceptional $54,649 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Average $95,070 | Excellent $97,809 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Good $101,387 | Poor $96,783 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Average $60,581 | Tragic $58,202 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 28.2% | Exceptional 23.9% |
Czechoslovakian vs Tsimshian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.3% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 52.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.9% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 47.4%), and married-couple family poverty (4.4% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 35.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty (12.4% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 5.2%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.0% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 6.2%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (15.1% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 7.1%).
Poverty Metric | Czechoslovakian | Tsimshian |
Poverty | Exceptional 11.4% | Tragic 13.0% |
Families | Exceptional 8.0% | Good 8.8% |
Males | Exceptional 10.3% | Tragic 12.8% |
Females | Exceptional 12.4% | Good 13.1% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Good 20.0% | Tragic 21.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Fair 13.7% | Exceptional 12.7% |
Children Under 5 years | Good 16.8% | Exceptional 14.7% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 15.1% | Exceptional 14.1% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 15.3% | Average 16.4% |
Girls Under 16 years | Excellent 15.5% | Exceptional 11.5% |
Single Males | Tragic 13.4% | Exceptional 11.1% |
Single Females | Fair 21.3% | Exceptional 19.1% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 17.1% | Exceptional 12.7% |
Single Mothers | Poor 29.7% | Exceptional 26.8% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 5.9% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 9.5% | Good 10.8% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 10.9% | Tragic 16.1% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 10.3% | Tragic 15.7% |
Czechoslovakian vs Tsimshian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.4% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 154.6%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.9% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 81.3%), and male unemployment (5.0% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 70.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 5.0%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.5% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 5.3%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 6.2%).
Unemployment Metric | Czechoslovakian | Tsimshian |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.8% | Tragic 7.2% |
Males | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 8.5% |
Females | Exceptional 4.8% | Fair 5.4% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.0% | Tragic 16.5% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.5% | Good 17.3% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.9% | Tragic 18.0% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Average 6.7% | Tragic 8.0% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Good 5.4% | Tragic 13.8% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Excellent 4.6% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Good 4.5% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.6% | Tragic 5.2% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.6% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Excellent 5.3% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.4% | Tragic 10.5% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Fair 7.7% | Exceptional 6.6% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Fair 9.1% | Tragic 11.4% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 5.1% | Poor 5.6% |
Czechoslovakian vs Tsimshian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.9% compared to 37.4%, a difference of 12.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.5% compared to 72.3%, a difference of 7.2%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.0% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 7.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.3% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 0.22%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.5% compared to 78.7%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.6% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 1.2%).
Labor Participation Metric | Czechoslovakian | Tsimshian |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 64.3% | Tragic 64.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Average 79.5% | Tragic 78.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 41.9% | Excellent 37.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 77.5% | Tragic 72.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 85.0% | Exceptional 88.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Good 84.8% | Exceptional 85.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Excellent 84.6% | Tragic 83.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Good 83.0% | Tragic 77.4% |
Czechoslovakian vs Tsimshian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (32.0% compared to 42.2%, a difference of 31.6%), single father households (2.3% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 24.4%), and divorced or separated (12.3% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 8.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.0% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 0.0%), married-couple households (48.5% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 0.41%), and single mother households (5.9% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 2.1%).
Family Structure Metric | Czechoslovakian | Tsimshian |
Family Households | Excellent 64.6% | Exceptional 67.1% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 27.0% | Tragic 27.0% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 48.5% | Exceptional 48.7% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.13 | Excellent 3.25 |
Single Father Households | Average 2.3% | Tragic 2.9% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.9% | Excellent 6.0% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 48.8% | Exceptional 47.7% |
Divorced or Separated | Poor 12.3% | Tragic 13.3% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Fair 32.0% | Tragic 42.2% |
Czechoslovakian vs Tsimshian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 15.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.7% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 13.9%), and no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 9.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 0.98%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.8% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 5.5%), and no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 9.7%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Czechoslovakian | Tsimshian |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.8% | Exceptional 8.6% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.3% | Exceptional 91.4% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 59.8% | Exceptional 56.7% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 21.7% | Fair 19.1% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.1% | Fair 6.2% |
Czechoslovakian vs Tsimshian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.2% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 32.3%), bachelor's degree (37.0% compared to 28.8%, a difference of 28.7%), and doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 27.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (92.6% compared to 92.9%, a difference of 0.24%), nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.9%, a difference of 0.41%), and kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.8%, a difference of 0.42%).
Education Level Metric | Czechoslovakian | Tsimshian |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.6% | Exceptional 1.7% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.9% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.8% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.8% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.8% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.8% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Exceptional 98.6% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Exceptional 98.4% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.8% | Exceptional 98.3% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.1% | Exceptional 97.8% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.9% | Exceptional 99.0% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 96.1% | Exceptional 97.0% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.1% | Exceptional 95.6% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 94.0% | Exceptional 94.4% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 92.6% | Exceptional 92.9% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 90.9% | Exceptional 91.3% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 87.4% | Excellent 86.6% |
College, Under 1 year | Good 65.8% | Poor 64.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Average 59.4% | Poor 57.9% |
Associate's Degree | Average 46.0% | Tragic 38.6% |
Bachelor's Degree | Fair 37.0% | Tragic 28.8% |
Master's Degree | Fair 14.5% | Tragic 11.4% |
Professional Degree | Fair 4.2% | Tragic 3.2% |
Doctorate Degree | Fair 1.8% | Tragic 1.4% |
Czechoslovakian vs Tsimshian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 59.4%), vision disability (2.2% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 44.8%), and disability age 65 to 74 (23.0% compared to 32.9%, a difference of 43.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (7.4% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 0.68%), cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 4.1%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 7.0%).
Disability Metric | Czechoslovakian | Tsimshian |
Disability | Tragic 12.5% | Tragic 16.1% |
Males | Tragic 12.3% | Tragic 15.6% |
Females | Tragic 12.7% | Tragic 16.8% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.5% | Tragic 2.4% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 5.9% | Tragic 7.9% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.4% | Tragic 7.4% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 11.8% | Tragic 16.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Good 23.0% | Tragic 32.9% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 46.6% | Tragic 59.2% |
Vision | Fair 2.2% | Tragic 3.2% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.6% | Tragic 4.7% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.6% | Average 17.3% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 6.4% | Tragic 8.8% |
Self-Care | Average 2.5% | Tragic 2.6% |