Immigrants from Oceania vs Tsimshian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Oceania
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Tsimshian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Oceania

Tsimshian

Average
Average
6,183
SOCIAL INDEX
59.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
161st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
4,927
SOCIAL INDEX
46.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
189th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Tsimshian Integration in Immigrants from Oceania Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 14,868,043 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Tsimshian within Immigrant from Oceania communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.336. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Oceania within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.033% in Tsimshian. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Oceania corresponds to an increase of 32.8 Tsimshian.
Immigrants from Oceania Integration in Tsimshian Communities

Immigrants from Oceania vs Tsimshian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($55,712 compared to $48,836, a difference of 14.1%), per capita income ($45,220 compared to $40,344, a difference of 12.1%), and householder income over 65 years ($64,416 compared to $58,202, a difference of 10.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($97,623 compared to $97,809, a difference of 0.19%), householder income under 25 years ($53,680 compared to $54,649, a difference of 1.8%), and median female earnings ($40,297 compared to $39,530, a difference of 1.9%).
Immigrants from Oceania vs Tsimshian Income
Income MetricImmigrants from OceaniaTsimshian
Per Capita Income
Excellent
$45,220
Tragic
$40,344
Median Family Income
Excellent
$106,453
Fair
$101,543
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$89,100
Fair
$83,346
Median Earnings
Excellent
$47,617
Tragic
$43,695
Median Male Earnings
Good
$55,712
Tragic
$48,836
Median Female Earnings
Good
$40,297
Average
$39,530
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$53,680
Exceptional
$54,649
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Excellent
$97,623
Excellent
$97,809
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Excellent
$103,705
Poor
$96,783
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$64,416
Tragic
$58,202
Wage/Income Gap
Average
25.6%
Exceptional
23.9%

Immigrants from Oceania vs Tsimshian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among girls under 16 (16.1% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 40.3%), receiving food stamps (11.4% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 38.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 37.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family poverty (8.7% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 0.30%), female poverty (13.3% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 1.8%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (16.0% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 2.5%).
Immigrants from Oceania vs Tsimshian Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from OceaniaTsimshian
Poverty
Average
12.3%
Tragic
13.0%
Families
Good
8.7%
Good
8.8%
Males
Average
11.2%
Tragic
12.8%
Females
Average
13.3%
Good
13.1%
Females 18 to 24 years
Excellent
19.7%
Tragic
21.2%
Females 25 to 34 years
Average
13.5%
Exceptional
12.7%
Children Under 5 years
Good
16.9%
Exceptional
14.7%
Children Under 16 years
Good
15.9%
Exceptional
14.1%
Boys Under 16 years
Good
16.0%
Average
16.4%
Girls Under 16 years
Good
16.1%
Exceptional
11.5%
Single Males
Exceptional
12.4%
Exceptional
11.1%
Single Females
Good
20.7%
Exceptional
19.1%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.4%
Exceptional
12.7%
Single Mothers
Good
28.7%
Exceptional
26.8%
Married Couples
Good
5.0%
Tragic
5.9%
Seniors Over 65 years
Excellent
10.4%
Good
10.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Excellent
11.7%
Tragic
16.1%
Receiving Food Stamps
Good
11.4%
Tragic
15.7%

Immigrants from Oceania vs Tsimshian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.4% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 155.5%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.0% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 80.4%), and male unemployment (5.3% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 59.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.2% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 0.53%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 1.3%), and female unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 3.9%).
Immigrants from Oceania vs Tsimshian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from OceaniaTsimshian
Unemployment
Good
5.2%
Tragic
7.2%
Males
Average
5.3%
Tragic
8.5%
Females
Good
5.2%
Fair
5.4%
Youth < 25
Excellent
11.4%
Tragic
16.5%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Excellent
17.2%
Good
17.3%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
10.0%
Tragic
18.0%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.4%
Tragic
8.0%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Good
5.4%
Tragic
13.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Fair
4.8%
Tragic
6.2%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Excellent
4.4%
Good
4.5%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
5.2%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Exceptional
4.6%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
4.5%
Seniors > 75
Poor
9.0%
Tragic
10.5%
Women w/ Children < 6
Good
7.5%
Exceptional
6.6%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.1%
Tragic
11.4%
Women w/ Children < 18
Excellent
5.3%
Poor
5.6%

Immigrants from Oceania vs Tsimshian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (82.1% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 6.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 72.3%, a difference of 5.3%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.2% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (83.9% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 0.39%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.3% compared to 78.7%, a difference of 0.84%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (37.9% compared to 37.4%, a difference of 1.5%).
Immigrants from Oceania vs Tsimshian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from OceaniaTsimshian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Excellent
65.5%
Tragic
64.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Poor
79.3%
Tragic
78.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
37.9%
Excellent
37.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
76.1%
Tragic
72.3%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
84.2%
Exceptional
88.7%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
84.0%
Exceptional
85.8%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
83.9%
Tragic
83.5%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
82.1%
Tragic
77.4%

Immigrants from Oceania vs Tsimshian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.6% compared to 42.2%, a difference of 37.9%), single father households (2.5% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 17.6%), and divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 11.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.29 compared to 3.25, a difference of 1.3%), currently married (46.5% compared to 47.7%, a difference of 2.5%), and family households (64.9% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 3.4%).
Immigrants from Oceania vs Tsimshian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from OceaniaTsimshian
Family Households
Exceptional
64.9%
Exceptional
67.1%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.1%
Tragic
27.0%
Married-couple Households
Good
46.9%
Exceptional
48.7%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.29
Excellent
3.25
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.5%
Tragic
2.9%
Single Mother Households
Average
6.3%
Excellent
6.0%
Currently Married
Average
46.5%
Exceptional
47.7%
Divorced or Separated
Good
11.9%
Tragic
13.3%
Births to Unmarried Women
Excellent
30.6%
Tragic
42.2%

Immigrants from Oceania vs Tsimshian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 23.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 14.2%), and no vehicles in household (9.7% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 13.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.4% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 1.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.5% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 1.6%), and no vehicles in household (9.7% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 13.3%).
Immigrants from Oceania vs Tsimshian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from OceaniaTsimshian
No Vehicles Available
Excellent
9.7%
Exceptional
8.6%
1+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
90.4%
Exceptional
91.4%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
57.5%
Exceptional
56.7%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
21.8%
Fair
19.1%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.6%
Fair
6.2%

Immigrants from Oceania vs Tsimshian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.6% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 43.6%), doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 35.9%), and no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 35.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.8% compared to 98.9%, a difference of 1.1%), kindergarten (97.8% compared to 98.8%, a difference of 1.1%), and 1st grade (97.8% compared to 98.8%, a difference of 1.1%).
Immigrants from Oceania vs Tsimshian Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from OceaniaTsimshian
No Schooling Completed
Poor
2.2%
Exceptional
1.7%
Nursery School
Poor
97.8%
Exceptional
98.9%
Kindergarten
Poor
97.8%
Exceptional
98.8%
1st Grade
Poor
97.8%
Exceptional
98.8%
2nd Grade
Poor
97.7%
Exceptional
98.8%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.6%
Exceptional
98.8%
4th Grade
Tragic
97.3%
Exceptional
98.6%
5th Grade
Poor
97.1%
Exceptional
98.4%
6th Grade
Poor
96.8%
Exceptional
98.3%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.7%
Exceptional
97.8%
8th Grade
Tragic
95.3%
Exceptional
99.0%
9th Grade
Poor
94.5%
Exceptional
97.0%
10th Grade
Poor
93.4%
Exceptional
95.6%
11th Grade
Fair
92.2%
Exceptional
94.4%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Fair
90.9%
Exceptional
92.9%
High School Diploma
Fair
88.8%
Exceptional
91.3%
GED/Equivalency
Fair
85.5%
Excellent
86.6%
College, Under 1 year
Average
65.6%
Poor
64.3%
College, 1 year or more
Average
59.4%
Poor
57.9%
Associate's Degree
Fair
45.8%
Tragic
38.6%
Bachelor's Degree
Fair
37.3%
Tragic
28.8%
Master's Degree
Fair
14.7%
Tragic
11.4%
Professional Degree
Good
4.6%
Tragic
3.2%
Doctorate Degree
Good
1.9%
Tragic
1.4%

Immigrants from Oceania vs Tsimshian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 107.4%), hearing disability (3.2% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 47.8%), and vision disability (2.2% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 47.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 1.8%), self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 5.6%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.7% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 10.8%).
Immigrants from Oceania vs Tsimshian Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from OceaniaTsimshian
Disability
Fair
11.8%
Tragic
16.1%
Males
Fair
11.4%
Tragic
15.6%
Females
Good
12.1%
Tragic
16.8%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.2%
Tragic
2.4%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.4%
Tragic
7.9%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Fair
6.7%
Tragic
7.4%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Fair
11.4%
Tragic
16.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Poor
24.0%
Tragic
32.9%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.0%
Tragic
59.2%
Vision
Average
2.2%
Tragic
3.2%
Hearing
Tragic
3.2%
Tragic
4.7%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.6%
Average
17.3%
Ambulatory
Good
6.1%
Tragic
8.8%
Self-Care
Fair
2.5%
Tragic
2.6%