Immigrants from Oceania vs Tsimshian Community Comparison
COMPARE
Immigrants from Oceania
Tsimshian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Immigrants from Oceania
Tsimshian
6,183
SOCIAL INDEX
59.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
161st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
4,927
SOCIAL INDEX
46.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
189th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Tsimshian Integration in Immigrants from Oceania Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 14,868,043 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Tsimshian within Immigrant from Oceania communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.336. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Oceania within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.033% in Tsimshian. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Oceania corresponds to an increase of 32.8 Tsimshian.
Immigrants from Oceania vs Tsimshian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($55,712 compared to $48,836, a difference of 14.1%), per capita income ($45,220 compared to $40,344, a difference of 12.1%), and householder income over 65 years ($64,416 compared to $58,202, a difference of 10.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($97,623 compared to $97,809, a difference of 0.19%), householder income under 25 years ($53,680 compared to $54,649, a difference of 1.8%), and median female earnings ($40,297 compared to $39,530, a difference of 1.9%).
Income Metric | Immigrants from Oceania | Tsimshian |
Per Capita Income | Excellent $45,220 | Tragic $40,344 |
Median Family Income | Excellent $106,453 | Fair $101,543 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $89,100 | Fair $83,346 |
Median Earnings | Excellent $47,617 | Tragic $43,695 |
Median Male Earnings | Good $55,712 | Tragic $48,836 |
Median Female Earnings | Good $40,297 | Average $39,530 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $53,680 | Exceptional $54,649 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Excellent $97,623 | Excellent $97,809 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Excellent $103,705 | Poor $96,783 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $64,416 | Tragic $58,202 |
Wage/Income Gap | Average 25.6% | Exceptional 23.9% |
Immigrants from Oceania vs Tsimshian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among girls under 16 (16.1% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 40.3%), receiving food stamps (11.4% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 38.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 37.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family poverty (8.7% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 0.30%), female poverty (13.3% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 1.8%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (16.0% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 2.5%).
Poverty Metric | Immigrants from Oceania | Tsimshian |
Poverty | Average 12.3% | Tragic 13.0% |
Families | Good 8.7% | Good 8.8% |
Males | Average 11.2% | Tragic 12.8% |
Females | Average 13.3% | Good 13.1% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Excellent 19.7% | Tragic 21.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Average 13.5% | Exceptional 12.7% |
Children Under 5 years | Good 16.9% | Exceptional 14.7% |
Children Under 16 years | Good 15.9% | Exceptional 14.1% |
Boys Under 16 years | Good 16.0% | Average 16.4% |
Girls Under 16 years | Good 16.1% | Exceptional 11.5% |
Single Males | Exceptional 12.4% | Exceptional 11.1% |
Single Females | Good 20.7% | Exceptional 19.1% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.4% | Exceptional 12.7% |
Single Mothers | Good 28.7% | Exceptional 26.8% |
Married Couples | Good 5.0% | Tragic 5.9% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Excellent 10.4% | Good 10.8% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Excellent 11.7% | Tragic 16.1% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Good 11.4% | Tragic 15.7% |
Immigrants from Oceania vs Tsimshian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.4% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 155.5%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.0% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 80.4%), and male unemployment (5.3% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 59.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.2% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 0.53%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 1.3%), and female unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 3.9%).
Unemployment Metric | Immigrants from Oceania | Tsimshian |
Unemployment | Good 5.2% | Tragic 7.2% |
Males | Average 5.3% | Tragic 8.5% |
Females | Good 5.2% | Fair 5.4% |
Youth < 25 | Excellent 11.4% | Tragic 16.5% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Excellent 17.2% | Good 17.3% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 10.0% | Tragic 18.0% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.4% | Tragic 8.0% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Good 5.4% | Tragic 13.8% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Fair 4.8% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Excellent 4.4% | Good 4.5% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 5.2% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.2% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Seniors > 75 | Poor 9.0% | Tragic 10.5% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Good 7.5% | Exceptional 6.6% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.1% | Tragic 11.4% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Excellent 5.3% | Poor 5.6% |
Immigrants from Oceania vs Tsimshian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (82.1% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 6.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 72.3%, a difference of 5.3%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.2% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (83.9% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 0.39%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.3% compared to 78.7%, a difference of 0.84%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (37.9% compared to 37.4%, a difference of 1.5%).
Labor Participation Metric | Immigrants from Oceania | Tsimshian |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Excellent 65.5% | Tragic 64.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Poor 79.3% | Tragic 78.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 37.9% | Excellent 37.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 76.1% | Tragic 72.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 84.2% | Exceptional 88.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 84.0% | Exceptional 85.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 83.9% | Tragic 83.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 82.1% | Tragic 77.4% |
Immigrants from Oceania vs Tsimshian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.6% compared to 42.2%, a difference of 37.9%), single father households (2.5% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 17.6%), and divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 11.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.29 compared to 3.25, a difference of 1.3%), currently married (46.5% compared to 47.7%, a difference of 2.5%), and family households (64.9% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 3.4%).
Family Structure Metric | Immigrants from Oceania | Tsimshian |
Family Households | Exceptional 64.9% | Exceptional 67.1% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.1% | Tragic 27.0% |
Married-couple Households | Good 46.9% | Exceptional 48.7% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.29 | Excellent 3.25 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.5% | Tragic 2.9% |
Single Mother Households | Average 6.3% | Excellent 6.0% |
Currently Married | Average 46.5% | Exceptional 47.7% |
Divorced or Separated | Good 11.9% | Tragic 13.3% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Excellent 30.6% | Tragic 42.2% |
Immigrants from Oceania vs Tsimshian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 23.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 14.2%), and no vehicles in household (9.7% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 13.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.4% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 1.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.5% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 1.6%), and no vehicles in household (9.7% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 13.3%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Immigrants from Oceania | Tsimshian |
No Vehicles Available | Excellent 9.7% | Exceptional 8.6% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 90.4% | Exceptional 91.4% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 57.5% | Exceptional 56.7% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 21.8% | Fair 19.1% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.6% | Fair 6.2% |
Immigrants from Oceania vs Tsimshian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.6% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 43.6%), doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 35.9%), and no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 35.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.8% compared to 98.9%, a difference of 1.1%), kindergarten (97.8% compared to 98.8%, a difference of 1.1%), and 1st grade (97.8% compared to 98.8%, a difference of 1.1%).
Education Level Metric | Immigrants from Oceania | Tsimshian |
No Schooling Completed | Poor 2.2% | Exceptional 1.7% |
Nursery School | Poor 97.8% | Exceptional 98.9% |
Kindergarten | Poor 97.8% | Exceptional 98.8% |
1st Grade | Poor 97.8% | Exceptional 98.8% |
2nd Grade | Poor 97.7% | Exceptional 98.8% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 97.6% | Exceptional 98.8% |
4th Grade | Tragic 97.3% | Exceptional 98.6% |
5th Grade | Poor 97.1% | Exceptional 98.4% |
6th Grade | Poor 96.8% | Exceptional 98.3% |
7th Grade | Tragic 95.7% | Exceptional 97.8% |
8th Grade | Tragic 95.3% | Exceptional 99.0% |
9th Grade | Poor 94.5% | Exceptional 97.0% |
10th Grade | Poor 93.4% | Exceptional 95.6% |
11th Grade | Fair 92.2% | Exceptional 94.4% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Fair 90.9% | Exceptional 92.9% |
High School Diploma | Fair 88.8% | Exceptional 91.3% |
GED/Equivalency | Fair 85.5% | Excellent 86.6% |
College, Under 1 year | Average 65.6% | Poor 64.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Average 59.4% | Poor 57.9% |
Associate's Degree | Fair 45.8% | Tragic 38.6% |
Bachelor's Degree | Fair 37.3% | Tragic 28.8% |
Master's Degree | Fair 14.7% | Tragic 11.4% |
Professional Degree | Good 4.6% | Tragic 3.2% |
Doctorate Degree | Good 1.9% | Tragic 1.4% |
Immigrants from Oceania vs Tsimshian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 107.4%), hearing disability (3.2% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 47.8%), and vision disability (2.2% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 47.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 1.8%), self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 5.6%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.7% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 10.8%).
Disability Metric | Immigrants from Oceania | Tsimshian |
Disability | Fair 11.8% | Tragic 16.1% |
Males | Fair 11.4% | Tragic 15.6% |
Females | Good 12.1% | Tragic 16.8% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.2% | Tragic 2.4% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.4% | Tragic 7.9% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Fair 6.7% | Tragic 7.4% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Fair 11.4% | Tragic 16.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Poor 24.0% | Tragic 32.9% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 48.0% | Tragic 59.2% |
Vision | Average 2.2% | Tragic 3.2% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.2% | Tragic 4.7% |
Cognitive | Tragic 17.6% | Average 17.3% |
Ambulatory | Good 6.1% | Tragic 8.8% |
Self-Care | Fair 2.5% | Tragic 2.6% |