Czech vs Tsimshian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Czech
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Tsimshian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Czechs

Tsimshian

Excellent
Average
8,484
SOCIAL INDEX
82.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
70th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
4,927
SOCIAL INDEX
46.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
189th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Tsimshian Integration in Czech Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 15,483,768 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Tsimshian within Czech communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.448. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Czechs within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.087% in Tsimshian. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Czechs corresponds to an increase of 86.9 Tsimshian.
Czech Integration in Tsimshian Communities

Czech vs Tsimshian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Czech and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (29.2% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 22.2%), median male earnings ($56,546 compared to $48,836, a difference of 15.8%), and per capita income ($44,595 compared to $40,344, a difference of 10.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($96,525 compared to $97,809, a difference of 1.3%), median female earnings ($38,992 compared to $39,530, a difference of 1.4%), and median household income ($86,164 compared to $83,346, a difference of 3.4%).
Czech vs Tsimshian Income
Income MetricCzechTsimshian
Per Capita Income
Good
$44,595
Tragic
$40,344
Median Family Income
Excellent
$105,839
Fair
$101,543
Median Household Income
Good
$86,164
Fair
$83,346
Median Earnings
Good
$47,221
Tragic
$43,695
Median Male Earnings
Excellent
$56,546
Tragic
$48,836
Median Female Earnings
Poor
$38,992
Average
$39,530
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Poor
$51,421
Exceptional
$54,649
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Good
$96,525
Excellent
$97,809
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Excellent
$103,507
Poor
$96,783
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Average
$61,244
Tragic
$58,202
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
29.2%
Exceptional
23.9%

Czech vs Tsimshian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Czech and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.2% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 70.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.5% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 52.4%), and married-couple family poverty (4.0% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 46.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.9% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 1.6%), child poverty under the age of 16 (13.8% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 2.0%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.4% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 4.0%).
Czech vs Tsimshian Poverty
Poverty MetricCzechTsimshian
Poverty
Exceptional
10.8%
Tragic
13.0%
Families
Exceptional
7.4%
Good
8.8%
Males
Exceptional
9.8%
Tragic
12.8%
Females
Exceptional
11.9%
Good
13.1%
Females 18 to 24 years
Fair
20.4%
Tragic
21.2%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.9%
Exceptional
12.7%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
15.5%
Exceptional
14.7%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.8%
Exceptional
14.1%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.1%
Average
16.4%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.2%
Exceptional
11.5%
Single Males
Tragic
13.5%
Exceptional
11.1%
Single Females
Average
21.0%
Exceptional
19.1%
Single Fathers
Tragic
17.0%
Exceptional
12.7%
Single Mothers
Good
28.9%
Exceptional
26.8%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.0%
Tragic
5.9%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.0%
Good
10.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
10.5%
Tragic
16.1%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.2%
Tragic
15.7%

Czech vs Tsimshian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Czech and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.0% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 174.8%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.3% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 92.7%), and male unemployment (4.5% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 87.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 1.4%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.7% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 3.9%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.0% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 8.0%).
Czech vs Tsimshian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricCzechTsimshian
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
7.2%
Males
Exceptional
4.5%
Tragic
8.5%
Females
Exceptional
4.4%
Fair
5.4%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.3%
Tragic
16.5%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
15.4%
Good
17.3%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.3%
Tragic
18.0%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Tragic
8.0%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
13.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.1%
Tragic
6.2%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.0%
Good
4.5%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
5.2%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
4.6%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
4.5%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.7%
Tragic
10.5%
Women w/ Children < 6
Average
7.6%
Exceptional
6.6%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.7%
Tragic
11.4%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
4.7%
Poor
5.6%

Czech vs Tsimshian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Czech and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.6% compared to 37.4%, a difference of 16.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (78.5% compared to 72.3%, a difference of 8.7%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.9% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 8.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.5% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 0.41%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.4% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.3% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 2.1%).
Czech vs Tsimshian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricCzechTsimshian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Excellent
65.4%
Tragic
64.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.5%
Tragic
78.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
43.6%
Excellent
37.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
78.5%
Tragic
72.3%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.6%
Exceptional
88.7%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.5%
Exceptional
85.8%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
85.3%
Tragic
83.5%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.9%
Tragic
77.4%

Czech vs Tsimshian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Czech and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.5% compared to 42.2%, a difference of 38.1%), single father households (2.3% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 24.8%), and divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 11.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (49.4% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 1.4%), family households with children (27.5% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 1.8%), and family households (64.5% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 4.1%).
Czech vs Tsimshian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricCzechTsimshian
Family Households
Good
64.5%
Exceptional
67.1%
Family Households with Children
Good
27.5%
Tragic
27.0%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
49.4%
Exceptional
48.7%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.11
Excellent
3.25
Single Father Households
Good
2.3%
Tragic
2.9%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.6%
Excellent
6.0%
Currently Married
Exceptional
49.9%
Exceptional
47.7%
Divorced or Separated
Good
11.9%
Tragic
13.3%
Births to Unmarried Women
Excellent
30.5%
Tragic
42.2%

Czech vs Tsimshian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Czech and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (6.9% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 24.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 19.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.5% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 18.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.3% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 2.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.5% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 8.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.5% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 18.0%).
Czech vs Tsimshian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricCzechTsimshian
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
6.9%
Exceptional
8.6%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
93.3%
Exceptional
91.4%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
61.5%
Exceptional
56.7%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
22.5%
Fair
19.1%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.4%
Fair
6.2%

Czech vs Tsimshian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Czech and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.4% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 37.5%), doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 34.3%), and bachelor's degree (38.0% compared to 28.8%, a difference of 32.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (94.4% compared to 94.4%, a difference of 0.0%), 10th grade (95.5% compared to 95.6%, a difference of 0.13%), and 5th grade (98.2% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.24%).
Czech vs Tsimshian Education Level
Education Level MetricCzechTsimshian
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.5%
Exceptional
1.7%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.6%
Exceptional
98.9%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.6%
Exceptional
98.8%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.8%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.8%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.8%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.6%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.4%
6th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Exceptional
98.3%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.4%
Exceptional
97.8%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.1%
Exceptional
99.0%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.4%
Exceptional
97.0%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.5%
Exceptional
95.6%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.4%
Exceptional
94.4%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
93.2%
Exceptional
92.9%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.6%
Exceptional
91.3%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.1%
Excellent
86.6%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
67.1%
Poor
64.3%
College, 1 year or more
Excellent
60.6%
Poor
57.9%
Associate's Degree
Good
47.2%
Tragic
38.6%
Bachelor's Degree
Average
38.0%
Tragic
28.8%
Master's Degree
Average
14.7%
Tragic
11.4%
Professional Degree
Average
4.4%
Tragic
3.2%
Doctorate Degree
Good
1.9%
Tragic
1.4%

Czech vs Tsimshian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Czech and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 55.4%), vision disability (2.1% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 52.2%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.3% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 48.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (7.2% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 1.9%), cognitive disability (16.4% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 5.4%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 15.2%).
Czech vs Tsimshian Disability
Disability MetricCzechTsimshian
Disability
Tragic
12.0%
Tragic
16.1%
Males
Tragic
11.9%
Tragic
15.6%
Females
Good
12.1%
Tragic
16.8%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.5%
Tragic
2.4%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
5.8%
Tragic
7.9%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.2%
Tragic
7.4%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Average
11.3%
Tragic
16.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
22.4%
Tragic
32.9%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
45.7%
Tragic
59.2%
Vision
Excellent
2.1%
Tragic
3.2%
Hearing
Tragic
3.5%
Tragic
4.7%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.4%
Average
17.3%
Ambulatory
Excellent
6.0%
Tragic
8.8%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.3%
Tragic
2.6%