Pima vs Tsimshian Community Comparison
COMPARE
Pima
Tsimshian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Pima
Tsimshian
1,700
SOCIAL INDEX
14.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
291st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
4,927
SOCIAL INDEX
46.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
189th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Tsimshian Integration in Pima Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 7,441,027 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Tsimshian within Pima communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 1.000. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pima within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.402% in Tsimshian. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Pima corresponds to an increase of 402.4 Tsimshian.
Pima vs Tsimshian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Pima and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($73,365 compared to $96,783, a difference of 31.9%), median household income ($63,262 compared to $83,346, a difference of 31.8%), and per capita income ($30,644 compared to $40,344, a difference of 31.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,503 compared to $54,649, a difference of 6.1%), median female earnings ($35,326 compared to $39,530, a difference of 11.9%), and wage/income gap (21.1% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 13.1%).
Income Metric | Pima | Tsimshian |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $30,644 | Tragic $40,344 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $77,431 | Fair $101,543 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $63,262 | Fair $83,346 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $38,285 | Tragic $43,695 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $42,357 | Tragic $48,836 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $35,326 | Average $39,530 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Poor $51,503 | Exceptional $54,649 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $82,821 | Excellent $97,809 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $73,365 | Poor $96,783 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $50,539 | Tragic $58,202 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 21.1% | Exceptional 23.9% |
Pima vs Tsimshian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Pima and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among girls under 16 (28.2% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 146.0%), family poverty (18.4% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 109.5%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (29.0% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 106.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (14.8% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 16.3%), receiving food stamps (19.0% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 20.6%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (28.4% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 33.9%).
Poverty Metric | Pima | Tsimshian |
Poverty | Tragic 21.9% | Tragic 13.0% |
Families | Tragic 18.4% | Good 8.8% |
Males | Tragic 20.4% | Tragic 12.8% |
Females | Tragic 23.6% | Good 13.1% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 28.4% | Tragic 21.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 25.3% | Exceptional 12.7% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 27.4% | Exceptional 14.7% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 29.0% | Exceptional 14.1% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 29.7% | Average 16.4% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 28.2% | Exceptional 11.5% |
Single Males | Tragic 20.2% | Exceptional 11.1% |
Single Females | Tragic 30.3% | Exceptional 19.1% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 14.8% | Exceptional 12.7% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 38.6% | Exceptional 26.8% |
Married Couples | Tragic 11.4% | Tragic 5.9% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 19.8% | Good 10.8% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 23.9% | Tragic 16.1% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 19.0% | Tragic 15.7% |
Pima vs Tsimshian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Pima and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (11.7% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 108.3%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.4% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 103.4%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (11.8% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 91.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (16.2% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 1.5%), male unemployment (8.3% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 2.3%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 8.9%).
Unemployment Metric | Pima | Tsimshian |
Unemployment | Tragic 8.2% | Tragic 7.2% |
Males | Tragic 8.3% | Tragic 8.5% |
Females | Tragic 9.3% | Fair 5.4% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 16.2% | Tragic 16.5% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 23.1% | Good 17.3% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 14.2% | Tragic 18.0% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 11.8% | Tragic 8.0% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 9.6% | Tragic 13.8% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 11.8% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 6.4% | Good 4.5% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 6.6% | Tragic 5.2% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Excellent 4.8% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 6.6% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 6.3% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.2% | Tragic 10.5% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 13.4% | Exceptional 6.6% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 18.9% | Tragic 11.4% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 11.7% | Poor 5.6% |
Pima vs Tsimshian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Pima and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 25-29 (74.3% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 19.4%), in labor force | age 20-64 (69.0% compared to 78.7%, a difference of 13.9%), and in labor force | age > 16 (57.4% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 12.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (69.0% compared to 72.3%, a difference of 4.7%), in labor force | age 45-54 (72.8% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 6.3%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (79.0% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 8.6%).
Labor Participation Metric | Pima | Tsimshian |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 57.4% | Tragic 64.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 69.0% | Tragic 78.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 34.1% | Excellent 37.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 69.0% | Tragic 72.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 74.3% | Exceptional 88.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 79.0% | Exceptional 85.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 74.8% | Tragic 83.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 72.8% | Tragic 77.4% |
Pima vs Tsimshian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Pima and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (4.2% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 44.5%), single mother households (8.3% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 37.8%), and married-couple households (35.6% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 37.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.1% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 0.20%), family households (65.9% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 1.7%), and divorced or separated (12.9% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 3.6%).
Family Structure Metric | Pima | Tsimshian |
Family Households | Exceptional 65.9% | Exceptional 67.1% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 27.1% | Tragic 27.0% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 35.6% | Exceptional 48.7% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.75 | Excellent 3.25 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 4.2% | Tragic 2.9% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 8.3% | Excellent 6.0% |
Currently Married | Tragic 35.9% | Exceptional 47.7% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 12.9% | Tragic 13.3% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 51.5% | Tragic 42.2% |
Pima vs Tsimshian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Pima and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 64.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 27.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 15.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.3% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 5.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 8.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 15.5%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Pima | Tsimshian |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 14.1% | Exceptional 8.6% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 86.3% | Exceptional 91.4% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 52.0% | Exceptional 56.7% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.0% | Fair 19.1% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.9% | Fair 6.2% |
Pima vs Tsimshian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Pima and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 27.7%), associate's degree (30.2% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 27.7%), and college, 1 year or more (45.6% compared to 57.9%, a difference of 27.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.9%, a difference of 0.64%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.8%, a difference of 0.64%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 98.8%, a difference of 0.64%).
Education Level Metric | Pima | Tsimshian |
No Schooling Completed | Average 2.1% | Exceptional 1.7% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.9% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.8% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.8% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.8% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Exceptional 98.8% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 97.7% | Exceptional 98.6% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Exceptional 98.4% |
6th Grade | Excellent 97.2% | Exceptional 98.3% |
7th Grade | Good 96.1% | Exceptional 97.8% |
8th Grade | Fair 95.6% | Exceptional 99.0% |
9th Grade | Tragic 93.9% | Exceptional 97.0% |
10th Grade | Tragic 91.2% | Exceptional 95.6% |
11th Grade | Tragic 88.3% | Exceptional 94.4% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 84.6% | Exceptional 92.9% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 81.6% | Exceptional 91.3% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 76.4% | Excellent 86.6% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 51.4% | Poor 64.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 45.6% | Poor 57.9% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 30.2% | Tragic 38.6% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 23.2% | Tragic 28.8% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 9.2% | Tragic 11.4% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.3% | Tragic 3.2% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.3% | Tragic 1.4% |
Pima vs Tsimshian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Pima and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 127.0%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.2% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 28.5%), and hearing disability (3.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 26.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 3.6%), vision disability (3.3% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 4.1%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.7% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 4.7%).
Disability Metric | Pima | Tsimshian |
Disability | Tragic 13.7% | Tragic 16.1% |
Males | Tragic 12.8% | Tragic 15.6% |
Females | Tragic 14.8% | Tragic 16.8% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.1% | Tragic 2.4% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.2% | Tragic 7.9% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.7% | Tragic 7.4% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 16.1% | Tragic 16.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 38.6% | Tragic 32.9% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 55.8% | Tragic 59.2% |
Vision | Tragic 3.3% | Tragic 3.2% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.7% | Tragic 4.7% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.8% | Average 17.3% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.2% | Tragic 8.8% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.8% | Tragic 2.6% |