Peruvian vs Tsimshian Community Comparison
COMPARE
Peruvian
Tsimshian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Peruvians
Tsimshian
5,786
SOCIAL INDEX
55.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
168th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
4,927
SOCIAL INDEX
46.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
189th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Tsimshian Integration in Peruvian Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 14,467,794 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Tsimshian within Peruvian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.169. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Peruvians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.572% in Tsimshian. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Peruvians corresponds to an increase of 572.3 Tsimshian.
Peruvian vs Tsimshian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Peruvian and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($55,659 compared to $48,836, a difference of 14.0%), per capita income ($44,479 compared to $40,344, a difference of 10.2%), and median earnings ($47,628 compared to $43,695, a difference of 9.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($98,886 compared to $97,809, a difference of 1.1%), median female earnings ($40,234 compared to $39,530, a difference of 1.8%), and householder income under 25 years ($56,052 compared to $54,649, a difference of 2.6%).
Income Metric | Peruvian | Tsimshian |
Per Capita Income | Good $44,479 | Tragic $40,344 |
Median Family Income | Excellent $105,444 | Fair $101,543 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $90,261 | Fair $83,346 |
Median Earnings | Excellent $47,628 | Tragic $43,695 |
Median Male Earnings | Good $55,659 | Tragic $48,836 |
Median Female Earnings | Good $40,234 | Average $39,530 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $56,052 | Exceptional $54,649 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $98,886 | Excellent $97,809 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $105,070 | Poor $96,783 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Excellent $62,766 | Tragic $58,202 |
Wage/Income Gap | Good 25.6% | Exceptional 23.9% |
Peruvian vs Tsimshian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Peruvian and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among girls under 16 (15.4% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 33.9%), receiving food stamps (11.7% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 33.9%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (17.2% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 23.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family poverty (8.8% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 0.20%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.7% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 0.26%), and single female poverty (19.4% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 1.4%).
Poverty Metric | Peruvian | Tsimshian |
Poverty | Excellent 11.8% | Tragic 13.0% |
Families | Good 8.8% | Good 8.8% |
Males | Excellent 10.7% | Tragic 12.8% |
Females | Excellent 12.9% | Good 13.1% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 17.2% | Tragic 21.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 12.7% | Exceptional 12.7% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 16.0% | Exceptional 14.7% |
Children Under 16 years | Excellent 15.3% | Exceptional 14.1% |
Boys Under 16 years | Excellent 15.5% | Average 16.4% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 15.4% | Exceptional 11.5% |
Single Males | Exceptional 11.8% | Exceptional 11.1% |
Single Females | Exceptional 19.4% | Exceptional 19.1% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.4% | Exceptional 12.7% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 27.5% | Exceptional 26.8% |
Married Couples | Fair 5.3% | Tragic 5.9% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 11.7% | Good 10.8% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 13.4% | Tragic 16.1% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Average 11.7% | Tragic 15.7% |
Peruvian vs Tsimshian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Peruvian and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.5% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 152.1%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.5% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 72.0%), and male unemployment (5.3% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 60.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 0.46%), female unemployment (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.5%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.7% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 1.9%).
Unemployment Metric | Peruvian | Tsimshian |
Unemployment | Fair 5.3% | Tragic 7.2% |
Males | Average 5.3% | Tragic 8.5% |
Females | Tragic 5.4% | Fair 5.4% |
Youth < 25 | Poor 11.8% | Tragic 16.5% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Fair 17.7% | Good 17.3% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Poor 10.5% | Tragic 18.0% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Good 6.6% | Tragic 8.0% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Average 5.5% | Tragic 13.8% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Average 4.7% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Fair 4.6% | Good 4.5% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Fair 4.8% | Tragic 5.2% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.0% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.5% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.3% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.0% | Tragic 10.5% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Good 7.5% | Exceptional 6.6% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.2% | Tragic 11.4% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Poor 5.6% | Poor 5.6% |
Peruvian vs Tsimshian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Peruvian and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.6% compared to 37.4%, a difference of 8.0%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.6% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 7.9%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.8% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 1.3%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.9% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.3% compared to 78.7%, a difference of 2.1%).
Labor Participation Metric | Peruvian | Tsimshian |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 66.3% | Tragic 64.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.3% | Tragic 78.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 34.6% | Excellent 37.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Poor 74.5% | Tragic 72.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Good 84.7% | Exceptional 88.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Good 84.8% | Exceptional 85.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 84.9% | Tragic 83.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.6% | Tragic 77.4% |
Peruvian vs Tsimshian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Peruvian and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (31.5% compared to 42.2%, a difference of 33.8%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 21.4%), and divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 12.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (67.1% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 0.070%), average family size (3.30 compared to 3.25, a difference of 1.5%), and currently married (46.6% compared to 47.7%, a difference of 2.3%).
Family Structure Metric | Peruvian | Tsimshian |
Family Households | Exceptional 67.1% | Exceptional 67.1% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 29.0% | Tragic 27.0% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 47.6% | Exceptional 48.7% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.30 | Excellent 3.25 |
Single Father Households | Fair 2.4% | Tragic 2.9% |
Single Mother Households | Fair 6.5% | Excellent 6.0% |
Currently Married | Average 46.6% | Exceptional 47.7% |
Divorced or Separated | Excellent 11.9% | Tragic 13.3% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Average 31.5% | Tragic 42.2% |
Peruvian vs Tsimshian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Peruvian and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.2% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 30.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 4.8%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.0% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 3.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (19.6% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 2.9%), 1 or more vehicles in household (88.8% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 2.9%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.0% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 3.1%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Peruvian | Tsimshian |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 11.2% | Exceptional 8.6% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 88.8% | Exceptional 91.4% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Fair 55.0% | Exceptional 56.7% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Average 19.6% | Fair 19.1% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Good 6.5% | Fair 6.2% |
Peruvian vs Tsimshian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Peruvian and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.4% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 44.1%), professional degree (4.5% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 41.7%), and master's degree (15.3% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 34.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, under 1 year (64.1% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 0.35%), college, 1 year or more (58.6% compared to 57.9%, a difference of 1.2%), and nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.9%, a difference of 1.3%).
Education Level Metric | Peruvian | Tsimshian |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 2.4% | Exceptional 1.7% |
Nursery School | Tragic 97.6% | Exceptional 98.9% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 97.6% | Exceptional 98.8% |
1st Grade | Tragic 97.6% | Exceptional 98.8% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 97.5% | Exceptional 98.8% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 97.4% | Exceptional 98.8% |
4th Grade | Tragic 97.1% | Exceptional 98.6% |
5th Grade | Tragic 96.8% | Exceptional 98.4% |
6th Grade | Tragic 96.4% | Exceptional 98.3% |
7th Grade | Tragic 95.1% | Exceptional 97.8% |
8th Grade | Tragic 94.7% | Exceptional 99.0% |
9th Grade | Tragic 93.8% | Exceptional 97.0% |
10th Grade | Tragic 92.6% | Exceptional 95.6% |
11th Grade | Tragic 91.5% | Exceptional 94.4% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.2% | Exceptional 92.9% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 87.8% | Exceptional 91.3% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 84.7% | Excellent 86.6% |
College, Under 1 year | Poor 64.1% | Poor 64.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Fair 58.6% | Poor 57.9% |
Associate's Degree | Average 46.4% | Tragic 38.6% |
Bachelor's Degree | Good 38.3% | Tragic 28.8% |
Master's Degree | Good 15.3% | Tragic 11.4% |
Professional Degree | Good 4.5% | Tragic 3.2% |
Doctorate Degree | Fair 1.8% | Tragic 1.4% |
Peruvian vs Tsimshian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Peruvian and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 92.1%), hearing disability (2.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 72.3%), and disability age 35 to 64 (9.9% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 69.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 3.6%), self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 9.9%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.0% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 23.7%).
Disability Metric | Peruvian | Tsimshian |
Disability | Exceptional 10.9% | Tragic 16.1% |
Males | Exceptional 10.4% | Tragic 15.6% |
Females | Exceptional 11.3% | Tragic 16.8% |
Age | Under 5 years | Fair 1.3% | Tragic 2.4% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.3% | Tragic 7.9% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 6.0% | Tragic 7.4% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 9.9% | Tragic 16.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 22.2% | Tragic 32.9% |
Age | Over 75 years | Excellent 46.8% | Tragic 59.2% |
Vision | Exceptional 2.1% | Tragic 3.2% |
Hearing | Exceptional 2.7% | Tragic 4.7% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.7% | Average 17.3% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.7% | Tragic 8.8% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.4% | Tragic 2.6% |