French Canadian vs Tsimshian Community Comparison

COMPARE

French Canadian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Tsimshian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

French Canadians

Tsimshian

Average
Average
5,542
SOCIAL INDEX
52.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
175th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
4,927
SOCIAL INDEX
46.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
189th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Tsimshian Integration in French Canadian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 15,558,878 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Tsimshian within French Canadian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.244. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in French Canadians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.121% in Tsimshian. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 French Canadians corresponds to an increase of 120.7 Tsimshian.
French Canadian Integration in Tsimshian Communities

French Canadian vs Tsimshian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (28.1% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 17.6%), median male earnings ($54,722 compared to $48,836, a difference of 12.0%), and per capita income ($43,003 compared to $40,344, a difference of 6.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median family income ($101,634 compared to $101,543, a difference of 0.090%), householder income over 65 years ($57,975 compared to $58,202, a difference of 0.39%), and median household income ($82,810 compared to $83,346, a difference of 0.65%).
French Canadian vs Tsimshian Income
Income MetricFrench CanadianTsimshian
Per Capita Income
Fair
$43,003
Tragic
$40,344
Median Family Income
Fair
$101,634
Fair
$101,543
Median Household Income
Poor
$82,810
Fair
$83,346
Median Earnings
Fair
$46,026
Tragic
$43,695
Median Male Earnings
Average
$54,722
Tragic
$48,836
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$38,436
Average
$39,530
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Good
$52,672
Exceptional
$54,649
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Fair
$93,694
Excellent
$97,809
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Fair
$99,093
Poor
$96,783
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$57,975
Tragic
$58,202
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
28.1%
Exceptional
23.9%

French Canadian vs Tsimshian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (18.6% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 46.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.4% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 40.7%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (16.1% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 40.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty (12.7% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 2.8%), child poverty among boys under 16 (15.9% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 3.4%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.9% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 6.9%).
French Canadian vs Tsimshian Poverty
Poverty MetricFrench CanadianTsimshian
Poverty
Exceptional
11.6%
Tragic
13.0%
Families
Exceptional
8.1%
Good
8.8%
Males
Exceptional
10.5%
Tragic
12.8%
Females
Exceptional
12.7%
Good
13.1%
Females 18 to 24 years
Good
19.9%
Tragic
21.2%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
14.3%
Exceptional
12.7%
Children Under 5 years
Fair
17.7%
Exceptional
14.7%
Children Under 16 years
Good
15.6%
Exceptional
14.1%
Boys Under 16 years
Good
15.9%
Average
16.4%
Girls Under 16 years
Good
16.1%
Exceptional
11.5%
Single Males
Tragic
14.6%
Exceptional
11.1%
Single Females
Tragic
22.2%
Exceptional
19.1%
Single Fathers
Tragic
18.6%
Exceptional
12.7%
Single Mothers
Tragic
30.8%
Exceptional
26.8%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.2%
Tragic
5.9%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.8%
Good
10.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.4%
Tragic
16.1%
Receiving Food Stamps
Good
11.4%
Tragic
15.7%

French Canadian vs Tsimshian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.8% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 139.3%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.2% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 76.4%), and male unemployment (5.1% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 64.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 1.5%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.8% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 3.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (11.2% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 6.1%).
French Canadian vs Tsimshian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricFrench CanadianTsimshian
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
7.2%
Males
Excellent
5.1%
Tragic
8.5%
Females
Exceptional
4.8%
Fair
5.4%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.2%
Tragic
16.5%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.8%
Good
17.3%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Good
10.2%
Tragic
18.0%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.0%
Tragic
8.0%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
5.8%
Tragic
13.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Poor
4.8%
Tragic
6.2%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Good
4.5%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Excellent
4.8%
Tragic
5.2%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Excellent
4.8%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.6%
Exceptional
4.6%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.4%
Exceptional
4.5%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
11.2%
Tragic
10.5%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.4%
Exceptional
6.6%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
10.3%
Tragic
11.4%
Women w/ Children < 18
Excellent
5.2%
Poor
5.6%

French Canadian vs Tsimshian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.6% compared to 37.4%, a difference of 16.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (78.1% compared to 72.3%, a difference of 8.0%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.5% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 6.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.2% compared to 78.7%, a difference of 0.65%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.0% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 0.76%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.3% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 0.95%).
French Canadian vs Tsimshian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricFrench CanadianTsimshian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
64.0%
Tragic
64.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
79.2%
Tragic
78.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
43.6%
Excellent
37.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
78.1%
Tragic
72.3%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.2%
Exceptional
88.7%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Good
84.8%
Exceptional
85.8%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Average
84.3%
Tragic
83.5%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Poor
82.5%
Tragic
77.4%

French Canadian vs Tsimshian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (34.4% compared to 42.2%, a difference of 22.5%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 21.1%), and average family size (3.07 compared to 3.25, a difference of 5.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (6.0% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 0.56%), currently married (48.0% compared to 47.7%, a difference of 0.69%), and married-couple households (47.5% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 2.5%).
French Canadian vs Tsimshian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricFrench CanadianTsimshian
Family Households
Tragic
63.7%
Exceptional
67.1%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.1%
Tragic
27.0%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
47.5%
Exceptional
48.7%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.07
Excellent
3.25
Single Father Households
Fair
2.4%
Tragic
2.9%
Single Mother Households
Excellent
6.0%
Excellent
6.0%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.0%
Exceptional
47.7%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.8%
Tragic
13.3%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
34.4%
Tragic
42.2%

French Canadian vs Tsimshian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 9.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 7.9%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 7.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 0.97%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.9% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 3.9%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 7.2%).
French Canadian vs Tsimshian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricFrench CanadianTsimshian
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.8%
Exceptional
8.6%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
92.3%
Exceptional
91.4%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
58.9%
Exceptional
56.7%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
20.6%
Fair
19.1%
4+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
6.6%
Fair
6.2%

French Canadian vs Tsimshian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 26.8%), professional degree (4.0% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 26.2%), and bachelor's degree (35.6% compared to 28.8%, a difference of 23.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, under 1 year (64.2% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 0.13%), college, 1 year or more (57.8% compared to 57.9%, a difference of 0.20%), and 5th grade (98.2% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.24%).
French Canadian vs Tsimshian Education Level
Education Level MetricFrench CanadianTsimshian
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.5%
Exceptional
1.7%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.6%
Exceptional
98.9%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.6%
Exceptional
98.8%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.8%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.8%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.8%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.6%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.4%
6th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Exceptional
98.3%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.4%
Exceptional
97.8%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.2%
Exceptional
99.0%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.3%
Exceptional
97.0%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.3%
Exceptional
95.6%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.0%
Exceptional
94.4%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.6%
Exceptional
92.9%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.9%
Exceptional
91.3%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
86.9%
Excellent
86.6%
College, Under 1 year
Poor
64.2%
Poor
64.3%
College, 1 year or more
Poor
57.8%
Poor
57.9%
Associate's Degree
Poor
44.9%
Tragic
38.6%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
35.6%
Tragic
28.8%
Master's Degree
Poor
14.1%
Tragic
11.4%
Professional Degree
Tragic
4.0%
Tragic
3.2%
Doctorate Degree
Fair
1.8%
Tragic
1.4%

French Canadian vs Tsimshian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.3% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 40.7%), disability age 65 to 74 (23.7% compared to 32.9%, a difference of 38.6%), and ambulatory disability (6.7% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 31.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.1% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 1.3%), self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 2.8%), and disability age 18 to 34 (8.1% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 9.4%).
French Canadian vs Tsimshian Disability
Disability MetricFrench CanadianTsimshian
Disability
Tragic
13.4%
Tragic
16.1%
Males
Tragic
13.3%
Tragic
15.6%
Females
Tragic
13.6%
Tragic
16.8%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.9%
Tragic
2.4%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.7%
Tragic
7.9%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
8.1%
Tragic
7.4%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
12.9%
Tragic
16.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Fair
23.7%
Tragic
32.9%
Age | Over 75 years
Good
47.0%
Tragic
59.2%
Vision
Tragic
2.3%
Tragic
3.2%
Hearing
Tragic
3.8%
Tragic
4.7%
Cognitive
Excellent
17.1%
Average
17.3%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.7%
Tragic
8.8%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Tragic
2.6%