Cherokee vs Tsimshian Community Comparison
COMPARE
Cherokee
Tsimshian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Cherokee
Tsimshian
2,697
SOCIAL INDEX
24.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
243rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
4,927
SOCIAL INDEX
46.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
189th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Tsimshian Integration in Cherokee Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 15,523,082 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Tsimshian within Cherokee communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.224. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Cherokee within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.061% in Tsimshian. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Cherokee corresponds to an increase of 61.3 Tsimshian.
Cherokee vs Tsimshian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($80,843 compared to $97,809, a difference of 21.0%), median family income ($88,209 compared to $101,543, a difference of 15.1%), and wage/income gap (27.4% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 14.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($48,669 compared to $48,836, a difference of 0.34%), median earnings ($41,252 compared to $43,695, a difference of 5.9%), and householder income over 65 years ($54,133 compared to $58,202, a difference of 7.5%).
Income Metric | Cherokee | Tsimshian |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $37,203 | Tragic $40,344 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $88,209 | Fair $101,543 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $72,682 | Fair $83,346 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $41,252 | Tragic $43,695 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $48,669 | Tragic $48,836 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $34,742 | Average $39,530 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $47,848 | Exceptional $54,649 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $80,843 | Excellent $97,809 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $86,125 | Poor $96,783 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $54,133 | Tragic $58,202 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.4% | Exceptional 23.9% |
Cherokee vs Tsimshian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among girls under 16 (19.9% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 73.6%), single father poverty (19.6% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 54.7%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (21.7% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 47.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.0% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 1.6%), male poverty (13.1% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 2.2%), and married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 2.3%).
Poverty Metric | Cherokee | Tsimshian |
Poverty | Tragic 14.4% | Tragic 13.0% |
Families | Tragic 10.6% | Good 8.8% |
Males | Tragic 13.1% | Tragic 12.8% |
Females | Tragic 15.6% | Good 13.1% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 22.7% | Tragic 21.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 17.2% | Exceptional 12.7% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 21.7% | Exceptional 14.7% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.5% | Exceptional 14.1% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 19.7% | Average 16.4% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 19.9% | Exceptional 11.5% |
Single Males | Tragic 16.1% | Exceptional 11.1% |
Single Females | Tragic 25.7% | Exceptional 19.1% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 19.6% | Exceptional 12.7% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 34.5% | Exceptional 26.8% |
Married Couples | Tragic 5.8% | Tragic 5.9% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Average 11.0% | Good 10.8% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Good 12.0% | Tragic 16.1% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.2% | Tragic 15.7% |
Cherokee vs Tsimshian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.4% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 116.1%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.5% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 70.9%), and male unemployment (5.6% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 51.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.59%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.7% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 2.4%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.9% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 3.4%).
Unemployment Metric | Cherokee | Tsimshian |
Unemployment | Fair 5.3% | Tragic 7.2% |
Males | Tragic 5.6% | Tragic 8.5% |
Females | Fair 5.3% | Fair 5.4% |
Youth < 25 | Fair 11.8% | Tragic 16.5% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Poor 17.9% | Good 17.3% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 10.5% | Tragic 18.0% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.6% | Tragic 8.0% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.4% | Tragic 13.8% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.2% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Poor 4.6% | Good 4.5% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.0% | Tragic 5.2% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Poor 4.9% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Fair 5.4% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Seniors > 65 | Excellent 5.1% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.8% | Tragic 10.5% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 9.3% | Exceptional 6.6% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 10.0% | Tragic 11.4% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 5.7% | Poor 5.6% |
Cherokee vs Tsimshian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 25-29 (82.1% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 8.0%), in labor force | age 16-19 (40.2% compared to 37.4%, a difference of 7.7%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.6% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 5.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 2.0%), in labor force | age 35-44 (81.4% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (76.2% compared to 78.7%, a difference of 3.2%).
Labor Participation Metric | Cherokee | Tsimshian |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 61.9% | Tragic 64.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 76.2% | Tragic 78.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 40.2% | Excellent 37.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 75.9% | Tragic 72.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 82.1% | Exceptional 88.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 81.6% | Exceptional 85.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 81.4% | Tragic 83.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 79.0% | Tragic 77.4% |
Cherokee vs Tsimshian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (36.7% compared to 42.2%, a difference of 14.9%), single mother households (6.8% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 13.5%), and single father households (2.6% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 10.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.5% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 1.6%), currently married (46.9% compared to 47.7%, a difference of 1.6%), and average family size (3.18 compared to 3.25, a difference of 2.0%).
Family Structure Metric | Cherokee | Tsimshian |
Family Households | Exceptional 65.0% | Exceptional 67.1% |
Family Households with Children | Average 27.5% | Tragic 27.0% |
Married-couple Households | Good 46.7% | Exceptional 48.7% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.18 | Excellent 3.25 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.6% | Tragic 2.9% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 6.8% | Excellent 6.0% |
Currently Married | Good 46.9% | Exceptional 47.7% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 13.7% | Tragic 13.3% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 36.7% | Tragic 42.2% |
Cherokee vs Tsimshian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 25.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 20.5%), and no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 11.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.4% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 1.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.9% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 5.7%), and no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 11.0%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Cherokee | Tsimshian |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.7% | Exceptional 8.6% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.4% | Exceptional 91.4% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 59.9% | Exceptional 56.7% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 23.0% | Fair 19.1% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.7% | Fair 6.2% |
Cherokee vs Tsimshian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in college, 1 year or more (53.2% compared to 57.9%, a difference of 8.9%), college, under 1 year (60.1% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 7.0%), and bachelor's degree (30.2% compared to 28.8%, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of master's degree (11.4% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 0.31%), nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.9%, a difference of 0.53%), and kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.8%, a difference of 0.53%).
Education Level Metric | Cherokee | Tsimshian |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.7% | Exceptional 1.7% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.9% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.8% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.8% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.8% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.8% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Exceptional 98.6% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.8% | Exceptional 98.4% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Exceptional 98.3% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.8% | Exceptional 97.8% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.5% | Exceptional 99.0% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.4% | Exceptional 97.0% |
10th Grade | Excellent 94.1% | Exceptional 95.6% |
11th Grade | Average 92.4% | Exceptional 94.4% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.5% | Exceptional 92.9% |
High School Diploma | Poor 88.5% | Exceptional 91.3% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 83.9% | Excellent 86.6% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 60.1% | Poor 64.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 53.2% | Poor 57.9% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 38.9% | Tragic 38.6% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 30.2% | Tragic 28.8% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.4% | Tragic 11.4% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.3% | Tragic 3.2% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Tragic 1.4% |
Cherokee vs Tsimshian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 36.0%), disability age over 75 (50.2% compared to 59.2%, a difference of 17.9%), and disability age 18 to 34 (8.7% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 17.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.0% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 4.1%), male disability (14.8% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 5.2%), and disability age 35 to 64 (15.5% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 8.2%).
Disability Metric | Cherokee | Tsimshian |
Disability | Tragic 14.8% | Tragic 16.1% |
Males | Tragic 14.8% | Tragic 15.6% |
Females | Tragic 14.9% | Tragic 16.8% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.8% | Tragic 2.4% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.9% | Tragic 7.9% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 8.7% | Tragic 7.4% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 15.5% | Tragic 16.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 28.2% | Tragic 32.9% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 50.2% | Tragic 59.2% |
Vision | Tragic 2.9% | Tragic 3.2% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.2% | Tragic 4.7% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.0% | Average 17.3% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 7.9% | Tragic 8.8% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.9% | Tragic 2.6% |