Immigrants from Uganda vs Tsimshian Community Comparison
COMPARE
Immigrants from Uganda
Tsimshian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Immigrants from Uganda
Tsimshian
6,298
SOCIAL INDEX
60.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
157th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
4,927
SOCIAL INDEX
46.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
189th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Tsimshian Integration in Immigrants from Uganda Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 10,904,533 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Tsimshian within Immigrant from Uganda communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.169. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Uganda within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.070% in Tsimshian. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Uganda corresponds to an increase of 70.0 Tsimshian.
Immigrants from Uganda vs Tsimshian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($56,064 compared to $48,836, a difference of 14.8%), per capita income ($45,043 compared to $40,344, a difference of 11.7%), and median earnings ($48,041 compared to $43,695, a difference of 10.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($95,698 compared to $97,809, a difference of 2.2%), median female earnings ($40,739 compared to $39,530, a difference of 3.1%), and householder income under 25 years ($52,374 compared to $54,649, a difference of 4.3%).
Income Metric | Immigrants from Uganda | Tsimshian |
Per Capita Income | Excellent $45,043 | Tragic $40,344 |
Median Family Income | Excellent $106,188 | Fair $101,543 |
Median Household Income | Excellent $87,553 | Fair $83,346 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $48,041 | Tragic $43,695 |
Median Male Earnings | Excellent $56,064 | Tragic $48,836 |
Median Female Earnings | Excellent $40,739 | Average $39,530 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Good $52,374 | Exceptional $54,649 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Good $95,698 | Excellent $97,809 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Excellent $103,584 | Poor $96,783 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Good $61,976 | Tragic $58,202 |
Wage/Income Gap | Excellent 24.9% | Exceptional 23.9% |
Immigrants from Uganda vs Tsimshian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among girls under 16 (16.8% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 46.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.8% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 36.6%), and receiving food stamps (11.9% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 32.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of poverty (12.8% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 1.6%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.8% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 1.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.1% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 3.0%).
Poverty Metric | Immigrants from Uganda | Tsimshian |
Poverty | Poor 12.8% | Tragic 13.0% |
Families | Average 9.1% | Good 8.8% |
Males | Tragic 11.8% | Tragic 12.8% |
Females | Fair 13.7% | Good 13.1% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 20.8% | Tragic 21.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Average 13.5% | Exceptional 12.7% |
Children Under 5 years | Fair 17.7% | Exceptional 14.7% |
Children Under 16 years | Fair 16.8% | Exceptional 14.1% |
Boys Under 16 years | Fair 17.0% | Average 16.4% |
Girls Under 16 years | Fair 16.8% | Exceptional 11.5% |
Single Males | Good 12.6% | Exceptional 11.1% |
Single Females | Excellent 20.3% | Exceptional 19.1% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 16.7% | Exceptional 12.7% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 28.3% | Exceptional 26.8% |
Married Couples | Average 5.2% | Tragic 5.9% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Fair 11.1% | Good 10.8% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Excellent 11.8% | Tragic 16.1% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Average 11.9% | Tragic 15.7% |
Immigrants from Uganda vs Tsimshian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 164.7%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.2% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 75.5%), and male unemployment (5.4% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 57.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.7% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 1.3%), female unemployment (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.8%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.7% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 4.3%).
Unemployment Metric | Immigrants from Uganda | Tsimshian |
Unemployment | Fair 5.3% | Tragic 7.2% |
Males | Fair 5.4% | Tragic 8.5% |
Females | Average 5.3% | Fair 5.4% |
Youth < 25 | Good 11.5% | Tragic 16.5% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.5% | Good 17.3% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Good 10.2% | Tragic 18.0% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Excellent 6.5% | Tragic 8.0% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.2% | Tragic 13.8% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Average 4.7% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 4.7% | Good 4.5% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.6% | Tragic 5.2% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.8% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 8.0% | Tragic 10.5% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Excellent 7.4% | Exceptional 6.6% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 10.7% | Tragic 11.4% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 5.7% | Poor 5.6% |
Immigrants from Uganda vs Tsimshian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (83.7% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 8.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.0% compared to 72.3%, a difference of 5.2%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (39.2% compared to 37.4%, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.2% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 0.75%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.0% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.7% compared to 78.7%, a difference of 2.6%).
Labor Participation Metric | Immigrants from Uganda | Tsimshian |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 67.5% | Tragic 64.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.7% | Tragic 78.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 39.2% | Excellent 37.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 76.0% | Tragic 72.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 86.0% | Exceptional 88.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.2% | Exceptional 85.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 85.0% | Tragic 83.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.7% | Tragic 77.4% |
Immigrants from Uganda vs Tsimshian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.5% compared to 42.2%, a difference of 38.2%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 21.3%), and divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 13.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.23 compared to 3.25, a difference of 0.45%), family households with children (28.0% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 3.6%), and currently married (45.0% compared to 47.7%, a difference of 6.0%).
Family Structure Metric | Immigrants from Uganda | Tsimshian |
Family Households | Tragic 62.7% | Exceptional 67.1% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.0% | Tragic 27.0% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 44.6% | Exceptional 48.7% |
Average Family Size | Good 3.23 | Excellent 3.25 |
Single Father Households | Fair 2.4% | Tragic 2.9% |
Single Mother Households | Poor 6.6% | Excellent 6.0% |
Currently Married | Tragic 45.0% | Exceptional 47.7% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.7% | Tragic 13.3% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Excellent 30.5% | Tragic 42.2% |
Immigrants from Uganda vs Tsimshian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.0% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 16.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.9% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 4.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.4% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 1.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.0% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 3.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.4% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 3.8%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Immigrants from Uganda | Tsimshian |
No Vehicles Available | Good 10.0% | Exceptional 8.6% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Good 90.1% | Exceptional 91.4% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Fair 55.0% | Exceptional 56.7% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 18.4% | Fair 19.1% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 5.9% | Fair 6.2% |
Immigrants from Uganda vs Tsimshian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.0% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 58.6%), doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 57.5%), and master's degree (16.6% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 45.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.9% compared to 98.9%, a difference of 1.0%), kindergarten (97.8% compared to 98.8%, a difference of 1.0%), and 2nd grade (97.8% compared to 98.8%, a difference of 1.0%).
Education Level Metric | Immigrants from Uganda | Tsimshian |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 2.3% | Exceptional 1.7% |
Nursery School | Poor 97.9% | Exceptional 98.9% |
Kindergarten | Poor 97.8% | Exceptional 98.8% |
1st Grade | Poor 97.8% | Exceptional 98.8% |
2nd Grade | Fair 97.8% | Exceptional 98.8% |
3rd Grade | Fair 97.7% | Exceptional 98.8% |
4th Grade | Poor 97.4% | Exceptional 98.6% |
5th Grade | Fair 97.2% | Exceptional 98.4% |
6th Grade | Fair 96.9% | Exceptional 98.3% |
7th Grade | Fair 96.0% | Exceptional 97.8% |
8th Grade | Fair 95.6% | Exceptional 99.0% |
9th Grade | Average 94.8% | Exceptional 97.0% |
10th Grade | Fair 93.5% | Exceptional 95.6% |
11th Grade | Fair 92.3% | Exceptional 94.4% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Fair 90.9% | Exceptional 92.9% |
High School Diploma | Fair 88.9% | Exceptional 91.3% |
GED/Equivalency | Average 85.7% | Excellent 86.6% |
College, Under 1 year | Excellent 66.5% | Poor 64.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Excellent 60.9% | Poor 57.9% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 48.5% | Tragic 38.6% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 40.7% | Tragic 28.8% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 16.6% | Tragic 11.4% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 3.2% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.2% | Tragic 1.4% |
Immigrants from Uganda vs Tsimshian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 109.5%), hearing disability (2.9% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 64.3%), and ambulatory disability (5.7% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 55.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 4.9%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.7% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 9.9%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 15.5%).
Disability Metric | Immigrants from Uganda | Tsimshian |
Disability | Exceptional 11.3% | Tragic 16.1% |
Males | Exceptional 10.8% | Tragic 15.6% |
Females | Exceptional 11.8% | Tragic 16.8% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.1% | Tragic 2.4% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 5.8% | Tragic 7.9% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Fair 6.7% | Tragic 7.4% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Average 11.2% | Tragic 16.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Excellent 22.8% | Tragic 32.9% |
Age | Over 75 years | Excellent 46.8% | Tragic 59.2% |
Vision | Exceptional 2.1% | Tragic 3.2% |
Hearing | Excellent 2.9% | Tragic 4.7% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.1% | Average 17.3% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.7% | Tragic 8.8% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.3% | Tragic 2.6% |