Latvian vs Tsimshian Community Comparison
COMPARE
Latvian
Tsimshian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Latvians
Tsimshian
9,576
SOCIAL INDEX
93.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
12th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
4,927
SOCIAL INDEX
46.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
189th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Tsimshian Integration in Latvian Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 13,438,447 people shows a near-perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Tsimshian within Latvian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.923. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Latvians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 3.437% in Tsimshian. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Latvians corresponds to an increase of 3,436.7 Tsimshian.
Latvian vs Tsimshian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Latvian and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($52,649 compared to $40,344, a difference of 30.5%), median male earnings ($63,498 compared to $48,836, a difference of 30.0%), and median earnings ($53,001 compared to $43,695, a difference of 21.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,783 compared to $54,649, a difference of 3.5%), median female earnings ($43,941 compared to $39,530, a difference of 11.2%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($108,926 compared to $97,809, a difference of 11.4%).
Income Metric | Latvian | Tsimshian |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $52,649 | Tragic $40,344 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $120,301 | Fair $101,543 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $97,311 | Fair $83,346 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $53,001 | Tragic $43,695 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $63,498 | Tragic $48,836 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $43,941 | Average $39,530 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Excellent $52,783 | Exceptional $54,649 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $108,926 | Excellent $97,809 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $115,957 | Poor $96,783 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $67,326 | Tragic $58,202 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.9% | Exceptional 23.9% |
Latvian vs Tsimshian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Latvian and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.1% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 72.5%), married-couple family poverty (3.9% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 51.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.8% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 48.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (26.9% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 0.21%), single female poverty (19.0% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 0.62%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (14.5% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 1.6%).
Poverty Metric | Latvian | Tsimshian |
Poverty | Exceptional 10.5% | Tragic 13.0% |
Families | Exceptional 7.1% | Good 8.8% |
Males | Exceptional 9.6% | Tragic 12.8% |
Females | Exceptional 11.4% | Good 13.1% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 19.5% | Tragic 21.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 11.8% | Exceptional 12.7% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 14.5% | Exceptional 14.7% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.2% | Exceptional 14.1% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.4% | Average 16.4% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.5% | Exceptional 11.5% |
Single Males | Good 12.7% | Exceptional 11.1% |
Single Females | Exceptional 19.0% | Exceptional 19.1% |
Single Fathers | Fair 16.5% | Exceptional 12.7% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 26.9% | Exceptional 26.8% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 3.9% | Tragic 5.9% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 9.5% | Good 10.8% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 10.8% | Tragic 16.1% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.1% | Tragic 15.7% |
Latvian vs Tsimshian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Latvian and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.0% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 175.6%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.9% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 80.8%), and male unemployment (4.8% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 74.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 2.4%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.7% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 3.8%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 5.1%).
Unemployment Metric | Latvian | Tsimshian |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 7.2% |
Males | Exceptional 4.8% | Tragic 8.5% |
Females | Exceptional 4.7% | Fair 5.4% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.0% | Tragic 16.5% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.7% | Good 17.3% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.9% | Tragic 18.0% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.2% | Tragic 8.0% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 13.8% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Good 4.5% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.6% | Tragic 5.2% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Good 4.8% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.9% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Seniors > 75 | Excellent 8.6% | Tragic 10.5% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.8% | Exceptional 6.6% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.6% | Tragic 11.4% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 4.9% | Poor 5.6% |
Latvian vs Tsimshian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Latvian and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (83.8% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 8.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 72.3%, a difference of 5.3%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (38.9% compared to 37.4%, a difference of 4.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (86.0% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 0.24%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 1.6%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.4% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 2.2%).
Labor Participation Metric | Latvian | Tsimshian |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Excellent 65.5% | Tragic 64.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.5% | Tragic 78.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.9% | Excellent 37.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 76.1% | Tragic 72.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 86.1% | Exceptional 88.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 86.0% | Exceptional 85.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 85.4% | Tragic 83.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.8% | Tragic 77.4% |
Latvian vs Tsimshian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Latvian and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (27.7% compared to 42.2%, a difference of 52.0%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 44.1%), and divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 15.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (48.5% compared to 47.7%, a difference of 1.6%), married-couple households (47.9% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 1.8%), and family households with children (26.4% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 2.3%).
Family Structure Metric | Latvian | Tsimshian |
Family Households | Tragic 62.8% | Exceptional 67.1% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.4% | Tragic 27.0% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 47.9% | Exceptional 48.7% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.11 | Excellent 3.25 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.0% | Tragic 2.9% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.3% | Excellent 6.0% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 48.5% | Exceptional 47.7% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.6% | Tragic 13.3% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 27.7% | Tragic 42.2% |
Latvian vs Tsimshian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 14.0%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.3% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 1.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 1.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 0.67%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.2% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 0.74%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 1.1%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Latvian | Tsimshian |
No Vehicles Available | Excellent 9.8% | Exceptional 8.6% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 90.3% | Exceptional 91.4% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 56.2% | Exceptional 56.7% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Fair 19.3% | Fair 19.1% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Fair 6.1% | Fair 6.2% |
Latvian vs Tsimshian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Latvian and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.2% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 96.3%), doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 83.3%), and master's degree (19.8% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 73.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (95.6% compared to 95.6%, a difference of 0.040%), 11th grade (94.7% compared to 94.4%, a difference of 0.24%), and 5th grade (98.1% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.34%).
Education Level Metric | Latvian | Tsimshian |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.5% | Exceptional 1.7% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.9% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.8% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.8% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.8% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.8% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.6% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Exceptional 98.4% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Exceptional 98.3% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.2% | Exceptional 97.8% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 97.0% | Exceptional 99.0% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 96.4% | Exceptional 97.0% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.6% | Exceptional 95.6% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 94.7% | Exceptional 94.4% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 93.6% | Exceptional 92.9% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 92.0% | Exceptional 91.3% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 89.2% | Excellent 86.6% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 71.6% | Poor 64.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 66.1% | Poor 57.9% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 53.9% | Tragic 38.6% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 46.1% | Tragic 28.8% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 19.8% | Tragic 11.4% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 6.2% | Tragic 3.2% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.6% | Tragic 1.4% |
Latvian vs Tsimshian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 83.6%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 64.4%), and vision disability (2.0% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 61.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 3.8%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.8% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 8.1%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 14.7%).
Disability Metric | Latvian | Tsimshian |
Disability | Excellent 11.4% | Tragic 16.1% |
Males | Good 11.1% | Tragic 15.6% |
Females | Exceptional 11.7% | Tragic 16.8% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.3% | Tragic 2.4% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.4% | Tragic 7.9% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Poor 6.8% | Tragic 7.4% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.2% | Tragic 16.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 21.2% | Tragic 32.9% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 45.1% | Tragic 59.2% |
Vision | Exceptional 2.0% | Tragic 3.2% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.2% | Tragic 4.7% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.6% | Average 17.3% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.7% | Tragic 8.8% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.3% | Tragic 2.6% |