Ecuadorian vs Tsimshian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 13,506,020 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Tsimshian within Ecuadorian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.072. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ecuadorians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.015% in Tsimshian. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ecuadorians corresponds to a decrease of 14.7 Tsimshian.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($91,574 compared to $97,809, a difference of 6.8%), median family income ($95,114 compared to $101,543, a difference of 6.8%), and householder income over 65 years ($54,958 compared to $58,202, a difference of 5.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($39,117 compared to $39,530, a difference of 1.1%), householder income under 25 years ($53,911 compared to $54,649, a difference of 1.4%), and median household income ($82,070 compared to $83,346, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among girls under 16 (18.8% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 64.2%), child poverty under the age of 16 (19.0% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 34.6%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (19.2% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 30.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male poverty (12.7% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 0.95%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.7% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 2.1%), and receiving food stamps (14.9% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 5.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.3% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 119.1%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (11.8% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 52.9%), and male unemployment (6.2% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 36.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.4% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 8.8%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.6% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 9.1%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.0% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 13.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.4% compared to 37.4%, a difference of 19.0%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.3% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 6.2%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (72.4% compared to 72.3%, a difference of 0.22%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 0.80%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.4% compared to 78.7%, a difference of 0.89%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (33.3% compared to 42.2%, a difference of 26.7%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 21.1%), and single mother households (7.2% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 19.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.32 compared to 3.25, a difference of 2.1%), family households with children (27.8% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 2.8%), and family households (65.0% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (22.8% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 164.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.5% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 38.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 35.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (77.9% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 17.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (42.0% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 35.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 35.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.0% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 78.3%), professional degree (3.9% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 23.2%), and bachelor's degree (35.4% compared to 28.8%, a difference of 23.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.1% compared to 98.9%, a difference of 1.8%), kindergarten (97.0% compared to 98.8%, a difference of 1.9%), and 1st grade (97.0% compared to 98.8%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 120.3%), hearing disability (2.5% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 87.5%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.7% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 56.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 0.28%), self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 3.1%), and disability age over 75 (47.4% compared to 59.2%, a difference of 25.0%).