Paraguayan vs Tsimshian Community Comparison
COMPARE
Paraguayan
Tsimshian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Paraguayans
Tsimshian
7,568
SOCIAL INDEX
73.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
112th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
4,927
SOCIAL INDEX
46.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
189th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Tsimshian Integration in Paraguayan Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 7,994,648 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Tsimshian within Paraguayan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 1.000. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Paraguayans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.252% in Tsimshian. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Paraguayans corresponds to an increase of 251.8 Tsimshian.
Paraguayan vs Tsimshian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Paraguayan and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($50,385 compared to $40,344, a difference of 24.9%), median male earnings ($59,975 compared to $48,836, a difference of 22.8%), and median earnings ($51,068 compared to $43,695, a difference of 16.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($55,614 compared to $54,649, a difference of 1.8%), wage/income gap (25.8% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 8.2%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($106,615 compared to $97,809, a difference of 9.0%).
Income Metric | Paraguayan | Tsimshian |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $50,385 | Tragic $40,344 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $114,016 | Fair $101,543 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $95,737 | Fair $83,346 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $51,068 | Tragic $43,695 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $59,975 | Tragic $48,836 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $43,173 | Average $39,530 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $55,614 | Exceptional $54,649 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $106,615 | Excellent $97,809 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $109,447 | Poor $96,783 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $64,443 | Tragic $58,202 |
Wage/Income Gap | Average 25.8% | Exceptional 23.9% |
Paraguayan vs Tsimshian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Paraguayan and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.7% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 47.3%), child poverty among girls under 16 (15.0% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 30.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.7% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 26.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (19.3% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 1.1%), single mother poverty (27.2% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 1.4%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (15.0% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 1.7%).
Poverty Metric | Paraguayan | Tsimshian |
Poverty | Exceptional 11.4% | Tragic 13.0% |
Families | Exceptional 8.3% | Good 8.8% |
Males | Exceptional 10.2% | Tragic 12.8% |
Females | Exceptional 12.6% | Good 13.1% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 19.4% | Tragic 21.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 12.0% | Exceptional 12.7% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 15.0% | Exceptional 14.7% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.7% | Exceptional 14.1% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.9% | Average 16.4% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 15.0% | Exceptional 11.5% |
Single Males | Exceptional 11.6% | Exceptional 11.1% |
Single Females | Exceptional 19.3% | Exceptional 19.1% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.2% | Exceptional 12.7% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 27.2% | Exceptional 26.8% |
Married Couples | Good 5.1% | Tragic 5.9% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Poor 11.4% | Good 10.8% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Poor 12.7% | Tragic 16.1% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 10.7% | Tragic 15.7% |
Paraguayan vs Tsimshian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Paraguayan and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 167.4%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.1% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 77.8%), and male unemployment (4.9% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 73.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.3%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.3% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 3.9%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.0% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 5.8%).
Unemployment Metric | Paraguayan | Tsimshian |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.9% | Tragic 7.2% |
Males | Exceptional 4.9% | Tragic 8.5% |
Females | Exceptional 5.1% | Fair 5.4% |
Youth < 25 | Fair 11.7% | Tragic 16.5% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 19.4% | Good 17.3% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Excellent 10.1% | Tragic 18.0% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Good 6.6% | Tragic 8.0% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Tragic 13.8% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Good 4.5% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.1% | Tragic 5.2% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.6% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.4% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Seniors > 75 | Good 8.7% | Tragic 10.5% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 7.0% | Exceptional 6.6% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 10.2% | Tragic 11.4% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 5.2% | Poor 5.6% |
Paraguayan vs Tsimshian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Paraguayan and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.8% compared to 37.4%, a difference of 10.4%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.5% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 7.9%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.9% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 3.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.8% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 0.050%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.7% compared to 72.3%, a difference of 2.0%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.4% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 2.2%).
Labor Participation Metric | Paraguayan | Tsimshian |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 66.5% | Tragic 64.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.6% | Tragic 78.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 33.8% | Excellent 37.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 73.7% | Tragic 72.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 85.9% | Exceptional 88.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.8% | Exceptional 85.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 85.4% | Tragic 83.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.5% | Tragic 77.4% |
Paraguayan vs Tsimshian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Paraguayan and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (29.7% compared to 42.2%, a difference of 42.1%), single father households (2.1% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 40.8%), and divorced or separated (11.5% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 16.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.1% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 0.22%), currently married (47.2% compared to 47.7%, a difference of 1.1%), and average family size (3.20 compared to 3.25, a difference of 1.4%).
Family Structure Metric | Paraguayan | Tsimshian |
Family Households | Fair 64.1% | Exceptional 67.1% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 27.1% | Tragic 27.0% |
Married-couple Households | Good 47.0% | Exceptional 48.7% |
Average Family Size | Poor 3.20 | Excellent 3.25 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.1% | Tragic 2.9% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.8% | Excellent 6.0% |
Currently Married | Good 47.2% | Exceptional 47.7% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.5% | Tragic 13.3% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 29.7% | Tragic 42.2% |
Paraguayan vs Tsimshian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Paraguayan and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (14.4% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 67.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.9% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 24.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.6% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 15.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (85.7% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 6.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (50.3% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 12.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.6% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 15.3%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Paraguayan | Tsimshian |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 14.4% | Exceptional 8.6% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 85.7% | Exceptional 91.4% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 50.3% | Exceptional 56.7% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 16.6% | Fair 19.1% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 4.9% | Fair 6.2% |
Paraguayan vs Tsimshian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Paraguayan and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.9% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 84.3%), master's degree (18.8% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 65.0%), and doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 62.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (86.5% compared to 86.6%, a difference of 0.18%), nursery school (97.9% compared to 98.9%, a difference of 0.97%), and kindergarten (97.9% compared to 98.8%, a difference of 0.98%).
Education Level Metric | Paraguayan | Tsimshian |
No Schooling Completed | Fair 2.2% | Exceptional 1.7% |
Nursery School | Fair 97.9% | Exceptional 98.9% |
Kindergarten | Fair 97.9% | Exceptional 98.8% |
1st Grade | Fair 97.9% | Exceptional 98.8% |
2nd Grade | Fair 97.8% | Exceptional 98.8% |
3rd Grade | Fair 97.7% | Exceptional 98.8% |
4th Grade | Fair 97.4% | Exceptional 98.6% |
5th Grade | Fair 97.3% | Exceptional 98.4% |
6th Grade | Fair 96.9% | Exceptional 98.3% |
7th Grade | Fair 95.9% | Exceptional 97.8% |
8th Grade | Fair 95.5% | Exceptional 99.0% |
9th Grade | Fair 94.7% | Exceptional 97.0% |
10th Grade | Average 93.7% | Exceptional 95.6% |
11th Grade | Good 92.7% | Exceptional 94.4% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Good 91.5% | Exceptional 92.9% |
High School Diploma | Good 89.5% | Exceptional 91.3% |
GED/Equivalency | Excellent 86.5% | Excellent 86.6% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 67.9% | Poor 64.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 62.9% | Poor 57.9% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 51.8% | Tragic 38.6% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 44.0% | Tragic 28.8% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 18.8% | Tragic 11.4% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 5.9% | Tragic 3.2% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.3% | Tragic 1.4% |
Paraguayan vs Tsimshian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Paraguayan and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 77.0%), disability age 35 to 64 (9.8% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 70.2%), and disability age 65 to 74 (20.5% compared to 32.9%, a difference of 60.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 2.8%), self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 16.7%), and disability age under 5 (2.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 22.0%).
Disability Metric | Paraguayan | Tsimshian |
Disability | Exceptional 10.6% | Tragic 16.1% |
Males | Exceptional 10.1% | Tragic 15.6% |
Females | Exceptional 11.2% | Tragic 16.8% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 2.0% | Tragic 2.4% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Tragic 7.9% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.9% | Tragic 7.4% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 9.8% | Tragic 16.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 20.5% | Tragic 32.9% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 45.0% | Tragic 59.2% |
Vision | Exceptional 2.0% | Tragic 3.2% |
Hearing | Exceptional 2.7% | Tragic 4.7% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.8% | Average 17.3% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.5% | Tragic 8.8% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.3% | Tragic 2.6% |