Hawaiian vs Tsimshian Community Comparison
COMPARE
Hawaiian
Tsimshian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Hawaiians
Tsimshian
3,537
SOCIAL INDEX
32.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
218th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
4,927
SOCIAL INDEX
46.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
189th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Tsimshian Integration in Hawaiian Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 15,053,456 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Tsimshian within Hawaiian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.158. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Hawaiians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.009% in Tsimshian. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Hawaiians corresponds to a decrease of 8.8 Tsimshian.
Hawaiian vs Tsimshian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($64,920 compared to $58,202, a difference of 11.5%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($90,722 compared to $97,809, a difference of 7.8%), and median female earnings ($37,497 compared to $39,530, a difference of 5.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median earnings ($43,673 compared to $43,695, a difference of 0.050%), median household income ($84,729 compared to $83,346, a difference of 1.7%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($98,778 compared to $96,783, a difference of 2.1%).
Income Metric | Hawaiian | Tsimshian |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $39,403 | Tragic $40,344 |
Median Family Income | Poor $98,869 | Fair $101,543 |
Median Household Income | Average $84,729 | Fair $83,346 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $43,673 | Tragic $43,695 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $50,488 | Tragic $48,836 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $37,497 | Average $39,530 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Excellent $53,078 | Exceptional $54,649 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Poor $90,722 | Excellent $97,809 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Fair $98,778 | Poor $96,783 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $64,920 | Tragic $58,202 |
Wage/Income Gap | Excellent 24.9% | Exceptional 23.9% |
Hawaiian vs Tsimshian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.1% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 44.7%), child poverty among girls under 16 (16.6% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 44.6%), and receiving food stamps (12.9% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 21.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among boys under 16 (16.5% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 0.56%), family poverty (9.0% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 3.1%), and female poverty (13.6% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 3.8%).
Poverty Metric | Hawaiian | Tsimshian |
Poverty | Fair 12.5% | Tragic 13.0% |
Families | Average 9.0% | Good 8.8% |
Males | Fair 11.4% | Tragic 12.8% |
Females | Fair 13.6% | Good 13.1% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 18.7% | Tragic 21.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Poor 14.1% | Exceptional 12.7% |
Children Under 5 years | Average 17.4% | Exceptional 14.7% |
Children Under 16 years | Fair 16.4% | Exceptional 14.1% |
Boys Under 16 years | Average 16.5% | Average 16.4% |
Girls Under 16 years | Average 16.6% | Exceptional 11.5% |
Single Males | Good 12.6% | Exceptional 11.1% |
Single Females | Fair 21.2% | Exceptional 19.1% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.1% | Exceptional 12.7% |
Single Mothers | Average 29.2% | Exceptional 26.8% |
Married Couples | Good 5.1% | Tragic 5.9% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 10.3% | Good 10.8% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.1% | Tragic 16.1% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 12.9% | Tragic 15.7% |
Hawaiian vs Tsimshian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.9% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 134.1%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.4% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 73.4%), and male unemployment (5.7% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 48.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.080%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 1.8%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.5% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 2.8%).
Unemployment Metric | Hawaiian | Tsimshian |
Unemployment | Tragic 5.5% | Tragic 7.2% |
Males | Tragic 5.7% | Tragic 8.5% |
Females | Fair 5.4% | Fair 5.4% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 12.0% | Tragic 16.5% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Poor 17.9% | Good 17.3% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Fair 10.4% | Tragic 18.0% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Poor 6.8% | Tragic 8.0% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 5.9% | Tragic 13.8% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.3% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Fair 4.5% | Good 4.5% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Poor 4.9% | Tragic 5.2% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.6% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.7% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.4% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.3% | Tragic 10.5% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 8.2% | Exceptional 6.6% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.1% | Tragic 11.4% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Average 5.5% | Poor 5.6% |
Hawaiian vs Tsimshian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 25-29 (83.0% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 6.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.0% compared to 72.3%, a difference of 6.6%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.5% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 5.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (78.7% compared to 78.7%, a difference of 0.050%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 0.34%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.2% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 0.41%).
Labor Participation Metric | Hawaiian | Tsimshian |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 64.7% | Tragic 64.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 78.7% | Tragic 78.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.4% | Excellent 37.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 77.0% | Tragic 72.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 83.0% | Exceptional 88.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 83.0% | Exceptional 85.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 83.2% | Tragic 83.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 81.5% | Tragic 77.4% |
Hawaiian vs Tsimshian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (33.2% compared to 42.2%, a difference of 26.9%), divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 10.7%), and single mother households (6.6% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 9.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (67.4% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 0.49%), married-couple households (47.8% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 1.9%), and currently married (46.6% compared to 47.7%, a difference of 2.3%).
Family Structure Metric | Hawaiian | Tsimshian |
Family Households | Exceptional 67.4% | Exceptional 67.1% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.7% | Tragic 27.0% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 47.8% | Exceptional 48.7% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.41 | Excellent 3.25 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.7% | Tragic 2.9% |
Single Mother Households | Poor 6.6% | Excellent 6.0% |
Currently Married | Average 46.6% | Exceptional 47.7% |
Divorced or Separated | Average 12.1% | Tragic 13.3% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Poor 33.2% | Tragic 42.2% |
Hawaiian vs Tsimshian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.9% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 45.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (24.3% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 27.2%), and no vehicles in household (8.0% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 6.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.0% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 0.68%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.4% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 6.6%), and no vehicles in household (8.0% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 6.8%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Hawaiian | Tsimshian |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.0% | Exceptional 8.6% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.0% | Exceptional 91.4% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 60.4% | Exceptional 56.7% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 24.3% | Fair 19.1% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.9% | Fair 6.2% |
Hawaiian vs Tsimshian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 30.4%), bachelor's degree (31.6% compared to 28.8%, a difference of 10.0%), and professional degree (3.4% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 8.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.9% compared to 98.9%, a difference of 0.98%), kindergarten (97.9% compared to 98.8%, a difference of 0.99%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 98.8%, a difference of 1.0%).
Education Level Metric | Hawaiian | Tsimshian |
No Schooling Completed | Fair 2.2% | Exceptional 1.7% |
Nursery School | Fair 97.9% | Exceptional 98.9% |
Kindergarten | Fair 97.9% | Exceptional 98.8% |
1st Grade | Fair 97.9% | Exceptional 98.8% |
2nd Grade | Fair 97.8% | Exceptional 98.8% |
3rd Grade | Fair 97.7% | Exceptional 98.8% |
4th Grade | Fair 97.4% | Exceptional 98.6% |
5th Grade | Fair 97.2% | Exceptional 98.4% |
6th Grade | Fair 96.9% | Exceptional 98.3% |
7th Grade | Poor 95.8% | Exceptional 97.8% |
8th Grade | Poor 95.5% | Exceptional 99.0% |
9th Grade | Fair 94.7% | Exceptional 97.0% |
10th Grade | Fair 93.5% | Exceptional 95.6% |
11th Grade | Fair 92.3% | Exceptional 94.4% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Poor 90.8% | Exceptional 92.9% |
High School Diploma | Poor 88.6% | Exceptional 91.3% |
GED/Equivalency | Poor 85.0% | Excellent 86.6% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 62.1% | Poor 64.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 55.6% | Poor 57.9% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 40.9% | Tragic 38.6% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 31.6% | Tragic 28.8% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.6% | Tragic 11.4% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.4% | Tragic 3.2% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Tragic 1.4% |
Hawaiian vs Tsimshian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 97.8%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 43.9%), and vision disability (2.3% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 40.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 0.99%), cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 1.8%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.9% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 7.0%).
Disability Metric | Hawaiian | Tsimshian |
Disability | Tragic 12.5% | Tragic 16.1% |
Males | Tragic 12.3% | Tragic 15.6% |
Females | Tragic 12.7% | Tragic 16.8% |
Age | Under 5 years | Good 1.2% | Tragic 2.4% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Good 5.5% | Tragic 7.9% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 6.9% | Tragic 7.4% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 12.3% | Tragic 16.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 25.5% | Tragic 32.9% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 49.2% | Tragic 59.2% |
Vision | Tragic 2.3% | Tragic 3.2% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.5% | Tragic 4.7% |
Cognitive | Tragic 17.6% | Average 17.3% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 6.5% | Tragic 8.8% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Tragic 2.6% |