Immigrants vs Tsimshian Community Comparison
COMPARE
Immigrants
Tsimshian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Immigrants
Tsimshian
3,042
SOCIAL INDEX
28.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
235th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
4,927
SOCIAL INDEX
46.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
189th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Tsimshian Integration in Immigrants Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 15,601,929 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Tsimshian within Immigrant communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.262. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.005% in Tsimshian. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants corresponds to a decrease of 5.2 Tsimshian.
Immigrants vs Tsimshian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($54,168 compared to $48,836, a difference of 10.9%), per capita income ($43,010 compared to $40,344, a difference of 6.6%), and median earnings ($46,478 compared to $43,695, a difference of 6.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($39,328 compared to $39,530, a difference of 0.52%), median family income ($100,962 compared to $101,543, a difference of 0.58%), and householder income over 65 years ($59,656 compared to $58,202, a difference of 2.5%).
Income Metric | Immigrants | Tsimshian |
Per Capita Income | Fair $43,010 | Tragic $40,344 |
Median Family Income | Fair $100,962 | Fair $101,543 |
Median Household Income | Good $85,818 | Fair $83,346 |
Median Earnings | Average $46,478 | Tragic $43,695 |
Median Male Earnings | Average $54,168 | Tragic $48,836 |
Median Female Earnings | Fair $39,328 | Average $39,530 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $53,201 | Exceptional $54,649 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Average $94,423 | Excellent $97,809 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Average $99,943 | Poor $96,783 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Fair $59,656 | Tragic $58,202 |
Wage/Income Gap | Excellent 25.1% | Exceptional 23.9% |
Immigrants vs Tsimshian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among girls under 16 (17.7% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 54.0%), single father poverty (15.9% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 24.9%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (17.5% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 24.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of poverty (13.2% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 1.8%), married-couple family poverty (6.0% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 2.3%), and male poverty (12.0% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 6.5%).
Poverty Metric | Immigrants | Tsimshian |
Poverty | Tragic 13.2% | Tragic 13.0% |
Families | Tragic 10.0% | Good 8.8% |
Males | Tragic 12.0% | Tragic 12.8% |
Females | Tragic 14.4% | Good 13.1% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 19.3% | Tragic 21.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Poor 14.0% | Exceptional 12.7% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 18.2% | Exceptional 14.7% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 17.5% | Exceptional 14.1% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 17.6% | Average 16.4% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 17.7% | Exceptional 11.5% |
Single Males | Good 12.7% | Exceptional 11.1% |
Single Females | Fair 21.4% | Exceptional 19.1% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.9% | Exceptional 12.7% |
Single Mothers | Poor 29.7% | Exceptional 26.8% |
Married Couples | Tragic 6.0% | Tragic 5.9% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 12.4% | Good 10.8% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 13.9% | Tragic 16.1% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.0% | Tragic 15.7% |
Immigrants vs Tsimshian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.7% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 141.3%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.6% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 68.9%), and male unemployment (5.5% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 52.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.0% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 3.3%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.8% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 3.7%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.7% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 5.6%).
Unemployment Metric | Immigrants | Tsimshian |
Unemployment | Tragic 5.5% | Tragic 7.2% |
Males | Tragic 5.5% | Tragic 8.5% |
Females | Tragic 5.7% | Fair 5.4% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 12.1% | Tragic 16.5% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 18.3% | Good 17.3% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 10.6% | Tragic 18.0% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 6.9% | Tragic 8.0% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 5.7% | Tragic 13.8% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 4.9% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 4.7% | Good 4.5% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.0% | Tragic 5.2% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.1% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.6% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.4% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Seniors > 75 | Average 8.7% | Tragic 10.5% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Fair 7.8% | Exceptional 6.6% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Fair 9.1% | Tragic 11.4% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 5.8% | Poor 5.6% |
Immigrants vs Tsimshian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.6% compared to 37.4%, a difference of 8.1%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.1% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 6.1%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.9% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 5.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (83.7% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 0.23%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.2% compared to 78.7%, a difference of 0.63%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.4% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 1.4%).
Labor Participation Metric | Immigrants | Tsimshian |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Excellent 65.4% | Tragic 64.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 79.2% | Tragic 78.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 34.6% | Excellent 37.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 74.1% | Tragic 72.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 83.9% | Exceptional 88.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 84.1% | Exceptional 85.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 83.7% | Tragic 83.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 82.1% | Tragic 77.4% |
Immigrants vs Tsimshian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (32.7% compared to 42.2%, a difference of 29.0%), single father households (2.5% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 17.8%), and single mother households (6.8% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 14.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (66.1% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 1.4%), average family size (3.33 compared to 3.25, a difference of 2.5%), and currently married (45.8% compared to 47.7%, a difference of 4.3%).
Family Structure Metric | Immigrants | Tsimshian |
Family Households | Exceptional 66.1% | Exceptional 67.1% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.9% | Tragic 27.0% |
Married-couple Households | Average 46.3% | Exceptional 48.7% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.33 | Excellent 3.25 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.5% | Tragic 2.9% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 6.8% | Excellent 6.0% |
Currently Married | Poor 45.8% | Exceptional 47.7% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.8% | Tragic 13.3% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Fair 32.7% | Tragic 42.2% |
Immigrants vs Tsimshian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.7% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 35.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 10.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.0% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 1.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 3.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.0% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 5.0%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Immigrants | Tsimshian |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 11.7% | Exceptional 8.6% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Good 90.1% | Exceptional 91.4% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Fair 54.7% | Exceptional 56.7% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 20.0% | Fair 19.1% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 6.8% | Fair 6.2% |
Immigrants vs Tsimshian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.8% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 68.3%), professional degree (4.4% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 37.1%), and doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 30.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.2% compared to 98.9%, a difference of 1.7%), kindergarten (97.2% compared to 98.8%, a difference of 1.7%), and college, 1 year or more (57.0% compared to 57.9%, a difference of 1.7%).
Education Level Metric | Immigrants | Tsimshian |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 2.8% | Exceptional 1.7% |
Nursery School | Tragic 97.2% | Exceptional 98.9% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 97.2% | Exceptional 98.8% |
1st Grade | Tragic 97.2% | Exceptional 98.8% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 97.1% | Exceptional 98.8% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 96.9% | Exceptional 98.8% |
4th Grade | Tragic 96.5% | Exceptional 98.6% |
5th Grade | Tragic 96.2% | Exceptional 98.4% |
6th Grade | Tragic 95.7% | Exceptional 98.3% |
7th Grade | Tragic 94.0% | Exceptional 97.8% |
8th Grade | Tragic 93.6% | Exceptional 99.0% |
9th Grade | Tragic 92.5% | Exceptional 97.0% |
10th Grade | Tragic 91.0% | Exceptional 95.6% |
11th Grade | Tragic 89.7% | Exceptional 94.4% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 88.2% | Exceptional 92.9% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 85.8% | Exceptional 91.3% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 82.6% | Excellent 86.6% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 62.5% | Poor 64.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 57.0% | Poor 57.9% |
Associate's Degree | Poor 44.5% | Tragic 38.6% |
Bachelor's Degree | Fair 36.7% | Tragic 28.8% |
Master's Degree | Fair 14.6% | Tragic 11.4% |
Professional Degree | Average 4.4% | Tragic 3.2% |
Doctorate Degree | Average 1.8% | Tragic 1.4% |
Immigrants vs Tsimshian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 103.5%), hearing disability (2.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 65.7%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.7% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 56.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 0.37%), self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 4.6%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.2% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 19.6%).
Disability Metric | Immigrants | Tsimshian |
Disability | Exceptional 11.3% | Tragic 16.1% |
Males | Exceptional 10.8% | Tragic 15.6% |
Females | Exceptional 11.7% | Tragic 16.8% |
Age | Under 5 years | Excellent 1.2% | Tragic 2.4% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.4% | Tragic 7.9% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 6.2% | Tragic 7.4% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.7% | Tragic 16.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Fair 23.7% | Tragic 32.9% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 48.2% | Tragic 59.2% |
Vision | Fair 2.2% | Tragic 3.2% |
Hearing | Exceptional 2.8% | Tragic 4.7% |
Cognitive | Good 17.2% | Average 17.3% |
Ambulatory | Excellent 6.0% | Tragic 8.8% |
Self-Care | Poor 2.5% | Tragic 2.6% |