Choctaw vs Tsimshian Community Comparison
COMPARE
Choctaw
Tsimshian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Choctaw
Tsimshian
2,496
SOCIAL INDEX
22.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
254th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
4,927
SOCIAL INDEX
46.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
189th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Tsimshian Integration in Choctaw Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 14,074,300 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Tsimshian within Choctaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 1.000. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Choctaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.014% in Tsimshian. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Choctaw corresponds to an increase of 14.3 Tsimshian.
Choctaw vs Tsimshian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($78,168 compared to $97,809, a difference of 25.1%), householder income under 25 years ($45,450 compared to $54,649, a difference of 20.2%), and median family income ($84,835 compared to $101,543, a difference of 19.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($47,729 compared to $48,836, a difference of 2.3%), median earnings ($40,270 compared to $43,695, a difference of 8.5%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,060 compared to $58,202, a difference of 9.7%).
Income Metric | Choctaw | Tsimshian |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $35,999 | Tragic $40,344 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $84,835 | Fair $101,543 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $69,947 | Fair $83,346 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $40,270 | Tragic $43,695 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $47,729 | Tragic $48,836 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $33,775 | Average $39,530 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $45,450 | Exceptional $54,649 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $78,168 | Excellent $97,809 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $82,287 | Poor $96,783 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,060 | Tragic $58,202 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 28.1% | Exceptional 23.9% |
Choctaw vs Tsimshian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among girls under 16 (21.1% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 84.3%), single father poverty (20.7% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 63.2%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (23.5% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 59.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.4% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 5.3%), married-couple family poverty (6.3% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 6.8%), and male poverty (14.4% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 12.4%).
Poverty Metric | Choctaw | Tsimshian |
Poverty | Tragic 15.6% | Tragic 13.0% |
Families | Tragic 11.6% | Good 8.8% |
Males | Tragic 14.4% | Tragic 12.8% |
Females | Tragic 16.8% | Good 13.1% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 24.3% | Tragic 21.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 18.1% | Exceptional 12.7% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 23.5% | Exceptional 14.7% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 21.0% | Exceptional 14.1% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 21.3% | Average 16.4% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 21.1% | Exceptional 11.5% |
Single Males | Tragic 17.0% | Exceptional 11.1% |
Single Females | Tragic 27.2% | Exceptional 19.1% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 20.7% | Exceptional 12.7% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 36.4% | Exceptional 26.8% |
Married Couples | Tragic 6.3% | Tragic 5.9% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Poor 11.4% | Good 10.8% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Fair 12.5% | Tragic 16.1% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.6% | Tragic 15.7% |
Choctaw vs Tsimshian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.4% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 114.2%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.6% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 69.3%), and male unemployment (5.6% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 50.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.1%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.0% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 2.7%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.7% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 4.5%).
Unemployment Metric | Choctaw | Tsimshian |
Unemployment | Poor 5.4% | Tragic 7.2% |
Males | Tragic 5.6% | Tragic 8.5% |
Females | Poor 5.4% | Fair 5.4% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 12.1% | Tragic 16.5% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 19.0% | Good 17.3% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 10.6% | Tragic 18.0% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.5% | Tragic 8.0% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.4% | Tragic 13.8% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.3% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 4.7% | Good 4.5% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.0% | Tragic 5.2% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.8% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.9% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Seniors > 75 | Fair 8.8% | Tragic 10.5% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 9.8% | Exceptional 6.6% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.9% | Tragic 11.4% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 5.9% | Poor 5.6% |
Choctaw vs Tsimshian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 25-29 (81.0% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 9.5%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.4% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 5.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (61.5% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 4.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (78.2% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 0.94%), in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 37.4%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.7% compared to 72.3%, a difference of 3.4%).
Labor Participation Metric | Choctaw | Tsimshian |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 61.5% | Tragic 64.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 75.4% | Tragic 78.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.0% | Excellent 37.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Fair 74.7% | Tragic 72.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 81.0% | Exceptional 88.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 81.4% | Exceptional 85.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 80.5% | Tragic 83.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 78.2% | Tragic 77.4% |
Choctaw vs Tsimshian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.0% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 17.2%), births to unmarried women (36.9% compared to 42.2%, a difference of 14.3%), and single father households (2.7% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 6.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.21 compared to 3.25, a difference of 1.1%), currently married (46.3% compared to 47.7%, a difference of 3.1%), and family households (64.9% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 3.4%).
Family Structure Metric | Choctaw | Tsimshian |
Family Households | Exceptional 64.9% | Exceptional 67.1% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.1% | Tragic 27.0% |
Married-couple Households | Fair 46.0% | Exceptional 48.7% |
Average Family Size | Fair 3.21 | Excellent 3.25 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.7% | Tragic 2.9% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.0% | Excellent 6.0% |
Currently Married | Fair 46.3% | Exceptional 47.7% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 14.1% | Tragic 13.3% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 36.9% | Tragic 42.2% |
Choctaw vs Tsimshian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 26.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 20.5%), and no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 8.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.2% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 0.91%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.3% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 4.6%), and no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 8.9%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Choctaw | Tsimshian |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.9% | Exceptional 8.6% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.2% | Exceptional 91.4% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 59.3% | Exceptional 56.7% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 23.0% | Fair 19.1% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.8% | Fair 6.2% |
Choctaw vs Tsimshian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in college, 1 year or more (52.3% compared to 57.9%, a difference of 10.7%), no schooling completed (1.8% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 9.4%), and college, under 1 year (59.3% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 8.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.9%, a difference of 0.60%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.8%, a difference of 0.60%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 98.8%, a difference of 0.61%).
Education Level Metric | Choctaw | Tsimshian |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.8% | Exceptional 1.7% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.9% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.8% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.8% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.8% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Exceptional 98.8% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Exceptional 98.6% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.7% | Exceptional 98.4% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.5% | Exceptional 98.3% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.5% | Exceptional 97.8% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.2% | Exceptional 99.0% |
9th Grade | Excellent 95.1% | Exceptional 97.0% |
10th Grade | Fair 93.6% | Exceptional 95.6% |
11th Grade | Tragic 91.8% | Exceptional 94.4% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 89.8% | Exceptional 92.9% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 87.8% | Exceptional 91.3% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 83.1% | Excellent 86.6% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 59.3% | Poor 64.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 52.3% | Poor 57.9% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 37.8% | Tragic 38.6% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 29.4% | Tragic 28.8% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.0% | Tragic 11.4% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.2% | Tragic 3.2% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.4% | Tragic 1.4% |
Choctaw vs Tsimshian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 28.6%), disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 21.3%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.9% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 14.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (15.4% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 1.3%), disability age 35 to 64 (16.4% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 1.9%), and vision disability (3.3% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 3.0%).
Disability Metric | Choctaw | Tsimshian |
Disability | Tragic 15.4% | Tragic 16.1% |
Males | Tragic 15.4% | Tragic 15.6% |
Females | Tragic 15.4% | Tragic 16.8% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.9% | Tragic 2.4% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.9% | Tragic 7.9% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 9.0% | Tragic 7.4% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 16.4% | Tragic 16.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 30.2% | Tragic 32.9% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 52.7% | Tragic 59.2% |
Vision | Tragic 3.3% | Tragic 3.2% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.5% | Tragic 4.7% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.4% | Average 17.3% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.3% | Tragic 8.8% |
Self-Care | Tragic 3.0% | Tragic 2.6% |