Chickasaw vs Tsimshian Community Comparison
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Tsimshian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Chickasaw
Tsimshian
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
4,927
SOCIAL INDEX
46.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
189th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Tsimshian Integration in Chickasaw Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 12,260,107 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Tsimshian within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.993. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.068% in Tsimshian. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to an increase of 68.4 Tsimshian.
Chickasaw vs Tsimshian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($77,929 compared to $97,809, a difference of 25.5%), householder income under 25 years ($44,763 compared to $54,649, a difference of 22.1%), and median household income ($70,005 compared to $83,346, a difference of 19.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($47,832 compared to $48,836, a difference of 2.1%), median earnings ($40,672 compared to $43,695, a difference of 7.4%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,732 compared to $58,202, a difference of 8.3%).
Income Metric | Chickasaw | Tsimshian |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $36,475 | Tragic $40,344 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $85,356 | Fair $101,543 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $70,005 | Fair $83,346 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $40,672 | Tragic $43,695 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $47,832 | Tragic $48,836 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $34,414 | Average $39,530 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $44,763 | Exceptional $54,649 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $77,929 | Excellent $97,809 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $82,193 | Poor $96,783 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,732 | Tragic $58,202 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.2% | Exceptional 23.9% |
Chickasaw vs Tsimshian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among girls under 16 (19.6% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 71.1%), single father poverty (19.0% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 49.3%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (21.8% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 48.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 0.97%), married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 1.8%), and male poverty (13.5% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 5.4%).
Poverty Metric | Chickasaw | Tsimshian |
Poverty | Tragic 14.7% | Tragic 13.0% |
Families | Tragic 10.8% | Good 8.8% |
Males | Tragic 13.5% | Tragic 12.8% |
Females | Tragic 15.9% | Good 13.1% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 24.5% | Tragic 21.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 17.0% | Exceptional 12.7% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 21.8% | Exceptional 14.7% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.5% | Exceptional 14.1% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 19.8% | Average 16.4% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 19.6% | Exceptional 11.5% |
Single Males | Tragic 16.3% | Exceptional 11.1% |
Single Females | Tragic 26.3% | Exceptional 19.1% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 19.0% | Exceptional 12.7% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 34.4% | Exceptional 26.8% |
Married Couples | Tragic 5.8% | Tragic 5.9% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Good 10.7% | Good 10.8% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.6% | Tragic 16.1% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.1% | Tragic 15.7% |
Chickasaw vs Tsimshian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.2% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 122.0%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.9% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 81.2%), and male unemployment (5.2% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 63.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 1.5%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.4% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 2.6%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.7% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 2.8%).
Unemployment Metric | Chickasaw | Tsimshian |
Unemployment | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 7.2% |
Males | Excellent 5.2% | Tragic 8.5% |
Females | Excellent 5.1% | Fair 5.4% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.2% | Tragic 16.5% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.7% | Good 17.3% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.9% | Tragic 18.0% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Fair 6.7% | Tragic 8.0% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.2% | Tragic 13.8% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 4.9% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Good 4.5% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Good 4.8% | Tragic 5.2% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.4% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.3% | Tragic 10.5% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 9.0% | Exceptional 6.6% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.6% | Tragic 11.4% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Good 5.4% | Poor 5.6% |
Chickasaw vs Tsimshian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 8.3%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 4.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 2.1%), in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 37.4%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 72.3%, a difference of 3.0%).
Labor Participation Metric | Chickasaw | Tsimshian |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 62.3% | Tragic 64.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 76.2% | Tragic 78.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.3% | Excellent 37.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Poor 74.5% | Tragic 72.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 81.9% | Exceptional 88.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 81.9% | Exceptional 85.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 80.9% | Tragic 83.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 79.0% | Tragic 77.4% |
Chickasaw vs Tsimshian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.0% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 17.2%), births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 42.2%, a difference of 16.1%), and divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 6.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.19 compared to 3.25, a difference of 1.9%), currently married (46.6% compared to 47.7%, a difference of 2.4%), and family households (64.4% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 4.2%).
Family Structure Metric | Chickasaw | Tsimshian |
Family Households | Good 64.4% | Exceptional 67.1% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.2% | Tragic 27.0% |
Married-couple Households | Fair 45.9% | Exceptional 48.7% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.19 | Excellent 3.25 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.8% | Tragic 2.9% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.0% | Excellent 6.0% |
Currently Married | Average 46.6% | Exceptional 47.7% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 14.2% | Tragic 13.3% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 36.3% | Tragic 42.2% |
Chickasaw vs Tsimshian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 20.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 16.3%), and no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 9.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 0.93%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 4.1%), and no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 9.3%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Chickasaw | Tsimshian |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.9% | Exceptional 8.6% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.3% | Exceptional 91.4% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 59.0% | Exceptional 56.7% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.2% | Fair 19.1% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.4% | Fair 6.2% |
Chickasaw vs Tsimshian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in college, 1 year or more (53.3% compared to 57.9%, a difference of 8.7%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 7.4%), and college, under 1 year (60.4% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 6.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of associate's degree (38.6% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 0.060%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 0.18%), and nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.9%, a difference of 0.49%).
Education Level Metric | Chickasaw | Tsimshian |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.7% | Exceptional 1.7% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.9% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.8% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.8% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.8% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.8% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Exceptional 98.6% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Exceptional 98.4% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Exceptional 98.3% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.7% | Exceptional 97.8% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.4% | Exceptional 99.0% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.5% | Exceptional 97.0% |
10th Grade | Excellent 94.1% | Exceptional 95.6% |
11th Grade | Fair 92.3% | Exceptional 94.4% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.3% | Exceptional 92.9% |
High School Diploma | Poor 88.4% | Exceptional 91.3% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 83.8% | Excellent 86.6% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 60.4% | Poor 64.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 53.3% | Poor 57.9% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 38.6% | Tragic 38.6% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 30.4% | Tragic 28.8% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.4% | Tragic 11.4% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.4% | Tragic 3.2% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Tragic 1.4% |
Chickasaw vs Tsimshian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 38.5%), disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 21.4%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.8% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 16.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (3.2% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 0.69%), male disability (15.1% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 3.2%), and disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 3.8%).
Disability Metric | Chickasaw | Tsimshian |
Disability | Tragic 15.2% | Tragic 16.1% |
Males | Tragic 15.1% | Tragic 15.6% |
Females | Tragic 15.2% | Tragic 16.8% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.7% | Tragic 2.4% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.8% | Tragic 7.9% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 9.0% | Tragic 7.4% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 16.1% | Tragic 16.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 30.2% | Tragic 32.9% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 51.2% | Tragic 59.2% |
Vision | Tragic 3.2% | Tragic 3.2% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.5% | Tragic 4.7% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.5% | Average 17.3% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.0% | Tragic 8.8% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.9% | Tragic 2.6% |