Immigrants from Costa Rica vs Native/Alaskan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 198,989,966 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Natives/Alaskans within Immigrant from Costa Rica communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.295. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Costa Rica within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.171% in Natives/Alaskans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Costa Rica corresponds to an increase of 170.5 Natives/Alaskans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($43,464 compared to $33,279, a difference of 30.6%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($100,141 compared to $79,816, a difference of 25.5%), and median household income ($85,054 compared to $67,879, a difference of 25.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (24.7% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 0.62%), householder income under 25 years ($52,643 compared to $47,704, a difference of 10.3%), and householder income over 65 years ($59,848 compared to $52,081, a difference of 14.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (12.5% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 56.4%), family poverty (9.4% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 52.0%), and married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 50.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.3% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 16.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.8% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 20.6%), and single mother poverty (29.2% compared to 36.6%, a difference of 25.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.7% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 53.3%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.7% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 46.8%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.6% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 46.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.6% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 7.7%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 8.8%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.1% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 10.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 60.6%, a difference of 8.2%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 73.9%, a difference of 7.8%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.1% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (35.6% compared to 36.6%, a difference of 2.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.9% compared to 72.4%, a difference of 3.4%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 78.9%, a difference of 6.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 33.6%), births to unmarried women (33.4% compared to 43.0%, a difference of 28.8%), and single mother households (6.7% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 19.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.3% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 0.47%), family households (65.6% compared to 66.4%, a difference of 1.1%), and average family size (3.26 compared to 3.45, a difference of 5.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 26.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 15.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.4% compared to 57.0%, a difference of 2.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.8% compared to 89.8%, a difference of 0.030%), no vehicles in household (10.3% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 2.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.4% compared to 57.0%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.4% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 48.3%), master's degree (14.7% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 47.5%), and bachelor's degree (36.9% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 40.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (94.0% compared to 93.9%, a difference of 0.060%), 4th grade (97.2% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.24%), and nursery school (97.7% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.25%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 47.2%), hearing disability (2.9% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 45.9%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.7% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 42.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 7.0%), disability age over 75 (46.8% compared to 53.1%, a difference of 13.3%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 14.4%).