Chickasaw vs Native/Alaskan Community Comparison
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Native/Alaskan
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Chickasaw
Natives/Alaskans
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
1,140
SOCIAL INDEX
9.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
321st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Native/Alaskan Integration in Chickasaw Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 146,220,578 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Natives/Alaskans within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.694. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.882% in Natives/Alaskans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to an increase of 881.8 Natives/Alaskans.
Chickasaw vs Native/Alaskan Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 10.6%), per capita income ($36,475 compared to $33,279, a difference of 9.6%), and median male earnings ($47,832 compared to $44,775, a difference of 6.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($34,414 compared to $33,806, a difference of 1.8%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,193 compared to $79,816, a difference of 3.0%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($77,929 compared to $75,647, a difference of 3.0%).
Income Metric | Chickasaw | Native/Alaskan |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $36,475 | Tragic $33,279 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $85,356 | Tragic $80,908 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $70,005 | Tragic $67,879 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $40,672 | Tragic $38,896 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $47,832 | Tragic $44,775 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $34,414 | Tragic $33,806 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $44,763 | Tragic $47,704 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $77,929 | Tragic $75,647 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $82,193 | Tragic $79,816 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,732 | Tragic $52,081 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.2% | Exceptional 24.6% |
Chickasaw vs Native/Alaskan Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 41.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 33.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 33.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.5% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 3.8%), single mother poverty (34.4% compared to 36.6%, a difference of 6.4%), and single female poverty (26.3% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 7.4%).
Poverty Metric | Chickasaw | Native/Alaskan |
Poverty | Tragic 14.7% | Tragic 18.1% |
Families | Tragic 10.8% | Tragic 14.3% |
Males | Tragic 13.5% | Tragic 16.9% |
Females | Tragic 15.9% | Tragic 19.2% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 24.5% | Tragic 25.4% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 17.0% | Tragic 20.3% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 21.8% | Tragic 25.6% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.5% | Tragic 23.8% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 19.8% | Tragic 24.0% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 19.6% | Tragic 24.0% |
Single Males | Tragic 16.3% | Tragic 19.6% |
Single Females | Tragic 26.3% | Tragic 28.2% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 19.0% | Tragic 22.4% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 34.4% | Tragic 36.6% |
Married Couples | Tragic 5.8% | Tragic 8.2% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Good 10.7% | Tragic 14.2% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.6% | Tragic 15.5% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.1% | Tragic 17.3% |
Chickasaw vs Native/Alaskan Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (5.2% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 49.2%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.9% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 47.4%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.7% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 45.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 25.4%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.7% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 28.2%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.0% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 28.6%).
Unemployment Metric | Chickasaw | Native/Alaskan |
Unemployment | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 7.0% |
Males | Excellent 5.2% | Tragic 7.7% |
Females | Excellent 5.1% | Tragic 6.6% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.2% | Tragic 14.5% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.7% | Tragic 21.5% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.9% | Tragic 13.0% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Fair 6.7% | Tragic 9.8% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.2% | Tragic 8.2% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 4.9% | Tragic 7.3% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Tragic 6.1% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Good 4.8% | Tragic 6.0% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Tragic 5.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 6.0% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 5.8% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.3% | Tragic 10.2% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 9.0% | Tragic 11.5% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.6% | Tragic 11.5% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Good 5.4% | Tragic 7.2% |
Chickasaw vs Native/Alaskan Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 36.6%, a difference of 4.9%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 79.2%, a difference of 3.5%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 2.5%), in labor force | age 35-44 (80.9% compared to 78.9%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 72.4%, a difference of 2.8%).
Labor Participation Metric | Chickasaw | Native/Alaskan |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 62.3% | Tragic 60.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 76.2% | Tragic 73.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.3% | Average 36.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Poor 74.5% | Tragic 72.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 81.9% | Tragic 79.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 81.9% | Tragic 79.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 80.9% | Tragic 78.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 79.0% | Tragic 77.1% |
Chickasaw vs Native/Alaskan Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 43.0%, a difference of 18.4%), single father households (2.8% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 16.5%), and single mother households (7.0% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 13.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.2% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 0.65%), family households (64.4% compared to 66.4%, a difference of 3.0%), and married-couple households (45.9% compared to 43.5%, a difference of 5.7%).
Family Structure Metric | Chickasaw | Native/Alaskan |
Family Households | Good 64.4% | Exceptional 66.4% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.2% | Exceptional 28.4% |
Married-couple Households | Fair 45.9% | Tragic 43.5% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.19 | Exceptional 3.45 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.8% | Tragic 3.2% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.0% | Tragic 8.0% |
Currently Married | Average 46.6% | Tragic 42.8% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 14.2% | Tragic 13.0% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 36.3% | Tragic 43.0% |
Chickasaw vs Native/Alaskan Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 33.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 10.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 57.0%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 2.5%), 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 89.8%, a difference of 2.7%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 57.0%, a difference of 3.6%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Chickasaw | Native/Alaskan |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.9% | Average 10.5% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.3% | Average 89.8% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 59.0% | Exceptional 57.0% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.2% | Exceptional 22.7% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.4% | Exceptional 8.2% |
Chickasaw vs Native/Alaskan Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 32.5%), bachelor's degree (30.4% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 15.5%), and master's degree (11.4% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 15.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.42%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.42%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.43%).
Education Level Metric | Chickasaw | Native/Alaskan |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.7% | Tragic 2.2% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.4% | Average 98.0% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.4% | Average 98.0% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Average 97.9% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Average 97.9% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Fair 97.7% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Fair 97.4% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Poor 97.2% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Poor 96.8% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.7% | Tragic 95.6% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.4% | Tragic 95.2% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.5% | Tragic 93.9% |
10th Grade | Excellent 94.1% | Tragic 92.2% |
11th Grade | Fair 92.3% | Tragic 90.2% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.3% | Tragic 87.7% |
High School Diploma | Poor 88.4% | Tragic 85.6% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 83.8% | Tragic 80.9% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 60.4% | Tragic 56.6% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 53.3% | Tragic 50.2% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 38.6% | Tragic 34.9% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 30.4% | Tragic 26.3% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.4% | Tragic 9.9% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.4% | Tragic 3.0% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Tragic 1.3% |
Chickasaw vs Native/Alaskan Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 11.7%), disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 9.2%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.8% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (30.2% compared to 30.4%, a difference of 0.62%), self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 1.9%), and cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 1.9%).
Disability Metric | Chickasaw | Native/Alaskan |
Disability | Tragic 15.2% | Tragic 14.2% |
Males | Tragic 15.1% | Tragic 14.2% |
Females | Tragic 15.2% | Tragic 14.1% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.7% | Tragic 1.9% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.8% | Tragic 6.3% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 9.0% | Tragic 8.2% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 16.1% | Tragic 15.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 30.2% | Tragic 30.4% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 51.2% | Tragic 53.1% |
Vision | Tragic 3.2% | Tragic 3.0% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.5% | Tragic 4.2% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.5% | Tragic 18.1% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.0% | Tragic 7.5% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.9% | Tragic 2.8% |