Laotian vs Native/Alaskan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 219,387,024 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Natives/Alaskans within Laotian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.241. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Laotians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.167% in Natives/Alaskans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Laotians corresponds to an increase of 167.2 Natives/Alaskans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Laotian and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($47,041 compared to $33,279, a difference of 41.3%), median household income ($94,990 compared to $67,879, a difference of 39.9%), and median family income ($112,859 compared to $80,908, a difference of 39.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.4% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 7.3%), householder income under 25 years ($54,369 compared to $47,704, a difference of 14.0%), and median female earnings ($42,133 compared to $33,806, a difference of 24.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Laotian and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (8.1% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 76.0%), married-couple family poverty (4.7% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 73.8%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (14.7% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 73.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.3% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 25.9%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.2% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 32.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.6% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 34.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Laotian and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.5% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 76.5%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.6% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 58.6%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 57.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 10.8%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 12.8%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 17.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Laotian and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (65.8% compared to 60.6%, a difference of 8.6%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.6% compared to 73.9%, a difference of 7.7%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.9% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.1% compared to 72.4%, a difference of 2.4%), in labor force | age 16-19 (34.9% compared to 36.6%, a difference of 4.8%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 6.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Laotian and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (28.5% compared to 43.0%, a difference of 51.0%), single father households (2.2% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 43.8%), and single mother households (5.8% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 37.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.5% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 0.27%), family households (65.8% compared to 66.4%, a difference of 0.88%), and average family size (3.26 compared to 3.45, a difference of 5.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Laotian and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.1% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 15.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 11.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 89.8%, a difference of 1.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.6% compared to 57.0%, a difference of 2.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 5.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Laotian and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.2% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 77.4%), doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 74.3%), and master's degree (17.0% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 71.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 6th grade (96.8% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 0.010%), 5th grade (97.1% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.060%), and 7th grade (95.7% compared to 95.6%, a difference of 0.080%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Laotian and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 58.6%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.1% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 51.4%), and vision disability (2.0% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 48.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 5.0%), disability age over 75 (47.9% compared to 53.1%, a difference of 10.8%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 16.5%).