Crow vs Native/Alaskan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 58,588,303 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Natives/Alaskans within Crow communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.720. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Crow within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.744% in Natives/Alaskans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Crow corresponds to an increase of 743.6 Natives/Alaskans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Crow and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (19.1% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 28.9%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($74,257 compared to $79,816, a difference of 7.5%), and median household income ($63,681 compared to $67,879, a difference of 6.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median earnings ($38,707 compared to $38,896, a difference of 0.49%), householder income under 25 years ($47,012 compared to $47,704, a difference of 1.5%), and median female earnings ($35,266 compared to $33,806, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Crow and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (30.3% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 35.2%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (33.2% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 30.7%), and receiving food stamps (13.4% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 28.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.9% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 2.9%), single mother poverty (38.6% compared to 36.6%, a difference of 5.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (15.2% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 6.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Crow and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 65 years (16.9% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 192.2%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (17.4% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 188.1%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (13.7% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 127.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.9% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 2.2%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (8.2% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 13.7%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 14.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Crow and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-24 (76.9% compared to 72.4%, a difference of 6.1%), in labor force | age 16-19 (38.5% compared to 36.6%, a difference of 5.3%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (75.9% compared to 79.2%, a difference of 4.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (60.8% compared to 60.6%, a difference of 0.31%), in labor force | age 20-64 (73.3% compared to 73.9%, a difference of 0.83%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (78.6% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 0.83%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Crow and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in average family size (3.82 compared to 3.45, a difference of 10.9%), single father households (3.5% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 9.6%), and divorced or separated (14.1% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 8.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.3% compared to 66.4%, a difference of 1.6%), family households with children (27.4% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 3.8%), and married-couple households (41.4% compared to 43.5%, a difference of 5.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Crow and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 5.2%), no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 5.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.7% compared to 57.0%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.3% compared to 89.8%, a difference of 0.59%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.5% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 1.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.7% compared to 57.0%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Crow and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 37.0%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 11.6%), and college, 1 year or more (54.5% compared to 50.2%, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (99.7% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 1.7%), kindergarten (99.7% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 1.7%), and 1st grade (99.6% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Crow and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 56.8%), vision disability (2.5% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 19.0%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 16.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (8.3% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 0.71%), hearing disability (4.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 0.79%), and cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 4.7%).