Immigrants from Russia vs Native/Alaskan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 330,267,196 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Natives/Alaskans within Immigrant from Russia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.059. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Russia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.023% in Natives/Alaskans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Russia corresponds to an increase of 23.3 Natives/Alaskans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($52,044 compared to $33,279, a difference of 56.4%), median family income ($116,942 compared to $80,908, a difference of 44.5%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($108,751 compared to $75,647, a difference of 43.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.4% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 7.4%), householder income under 25 years ($55,891 compared to $47,704, a difference of 17.2%), and householder income over 65 years ($64,512 compared to $52,081, a difference of 23.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (8.2% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 73.2%), child poverty under the age of 5 (15.0% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 70.5%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.2% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 66.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.4% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 15.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.5% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 23.8%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.4% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 30.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.7% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 73.0%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.6% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 57.8%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.4% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 53.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 13.3%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 14.1%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 14.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-64 (79.9% compared to 73.9%, a difference of 8.2%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.3% compared to 60.6%, a difference of 7.8%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 7.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (73.5% compared to 72.4%, a difference of 1.4%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 7.1%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 36.6%, a difference of 7.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 63.9%), births to unmarried women (27.1% compared to 43.0%, a difference of 58.3%), and single mother households (5.5% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 45.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.2% compared to 66.4%, a difference of 5.0%), family households with children (26.8% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 6.2%), and married-couple households (47.0% compared to 43.5%, a difference of 8.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.3% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 54.0%), no vehicles in household (15.1% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 43.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.9% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 34.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (85.4% compared to 89.8%, a difference of 5.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (50.3% compared to 57.0%, a difference of 13.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.9% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 34.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.0% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 104.4%), master's degree (19.4% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 95.4%), and doctorate degree (2.5% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 90.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.020%), nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.030%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.030%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 80.7%), disability age 35 to 64 (9.8% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 55.4%), and vision disability (2.0% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 48.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 8.1%), self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 11.0%), and disability age over 75 (47.0% compared to 53.1%, a difference of 12.9%).