Houma vs Native/Alaskan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 36,591,273 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Natives/Alaskans within Houma communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.954. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Houma within a typical geography, there is an increase of 1.040% in Natives/Alaskans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Houma corresponds to an increase of 1,040.4 Natives/Alaskans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Houma and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (38.7% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 57.3%), householder income over 65 years ($44,822 compared to $52,081, a difference of 16.2%), and median male earnings ($50,547 compared to $44,775, a difference of 12.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median earnings ($38,949 compared to $38,896, a difference of 0.14%), per capita income ($32,996 compared to $33,279, a difference of 0.86%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($77,044 compared to $75,647, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Houma and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (6.4% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 28.4%), single female poverty (33.8% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 19.8%), and single male poverty (23.5% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 19.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male poverty (16.7% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 1.2%), poverty (18.4% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 2.0%), and family poverty (14.6% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Houma and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.4% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 22.6%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 21.0%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 15.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (21.6% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 0.54%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (12.6% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 3.0%), and female unemployment (6.4% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Houma and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (74.1% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 4.1%), in labor force | age 16-19 (35.6% compared to 36.6%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (81.2% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (79.5% compared to 78.9%, a difference of 0.79%), in labor force | age 30-34 (79.9% compared to 79.2%, a difference of 0.93%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (72.7% compared to 73.9%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Houma and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.9% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 9.8%), average family size (3.18 compared to 3.45, a difference of 8.5%), and births to unmarried women (46.6% compared to 43.0%, a difference of 8.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.5% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 0.41%), family households (65.7% compared to 66.4%, a difference of 0.97%), and single mother households (7.9% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Houma and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (4.9% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 66.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (16.1% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 41.6%), and no vehicles in household (11.5% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 9.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.6% compared to 89.8%, a difference of 1.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.4% compared to 57.0%, a difference of 4.7%), and no vehicles in household (11.5% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 9.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Houma and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (0.96% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 38.2%), professional degree (2.2% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 33.4%), and master's degree (7.9% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 25.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 7th grade (95.1% compared to 95.6%, a difference of 0.46%), 5th grade (96.6% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.58%), and 3rd grade (97.1% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.59%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Houma and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (9.1% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 43.6%), ambulatory disability (9.3% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 23.7%), and male disability (17.4% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 22.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (4.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 0.83%), disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 4.1%), and disability age over 75 (56.2% compared to 53.1%, a difference of 5.8%).