French Canadian vs Native/Alaskan Community Comparison
COMPARE
French Canadian
Native/Alaskan
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
French Canadians
Natives/Alaskans
5,542
SOCIAL INDEX
52.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
175th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
1,140
SOCIAL INDEX
9.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
321st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Native/Alaskan Integration in French Canadian Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 460,087,005 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Natives/Alaskans within French Canadian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.630. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in French Canadians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.081% in Natives/Alaskans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 French Canadians corresponds to an increase of 81.4 Natives/Alaskans.
French Canadian vs Native/Alaskan Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($43,003 compared to $33,279, a difference of 29.2%), median family income ($101,634 compared to $80,908, a difference of 25.6%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($99,093 compared to $79,816, a difference of 24.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,672 compared to $47,704, a difference of 10.4%), householder income over 65 years ($57,975 compared to $52,081, a difference of 11.3%), and median female earnings ($38,436 compared to $33,806, a difference of 13.7%).
Income Metric | French Canadian | Native/Alaskan |
Per Capita Income | Fair $43,003 | Tragic $33,279 |
Median Family Income | Fair $101,634 | Tragic $80,908 |
Median Household Income | Poor $82,810 | Tragic $67,879 |
Median Earnings | Fair $46,026 | Tragic $38,896 |
Median Male Earnings | Average $54,722 | Tragic $44,775 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $38,436 | Tragic $33,806 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Good $52,672 | Tragic $47,704 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Fair $93,694 | Tragic $75,647 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Fair $99,093 | Tragic $79,816 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $57,975 | Tragic $52,081 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 28.1% | Exceptional 24.6% |
French Canadian vs Native/Alaskan Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.2% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 92.7%), family poverty (8.1% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 75.3%), and male poverty (10.5% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 60.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (30.8% compared to 36.6%, a difference of 18.9%), single father poverty (18.6% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 20.6%), and single female poverty (22.2% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 27.3%).
Poverty Metric | French Canadian | Native/Alaskan |
Poverty | Exceptional 11.6% | Tragic 18.1% |
Families | Exceptional 8.1% | Tragic 14.3% |
Males | Exceptional 10.5% | Tragic 16.9% |
Females | Exceptional 12.7% | Tragic 19.2% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Good 19.9% | Tragic 25.4% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 14.3% | Tragic 20.3% |
Children Under 5 years | Fair 17.7% | Tragic 25.6% |
Children Under 16 years | Good 15.6% | Tragic 23.8% |
Boys Under 16 years | Good 15.9% | Tragic 24.0% |
Girls Under 16 years | Good 16.1% | Tragic 24.0% |
Single Males | Tragic 14.6% | Tragic 19.6% |
Single Females | Tragic 22.2% | Tragic 28.2% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 18.6% | Tragic 22.4% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 30.8% | Tragic 36.6% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.2% | Tragic 8.2% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 9.8% | Tragic 14.2% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.4% | Tragic 15.5% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Good 11.4% | Tragic 17.3% |
French Canadian vs Native/Alaskan Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.8% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 50.4%), male unemployment (5.1% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 50.3%), and unemployment (4.9% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 44.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.6% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 6.9%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 7.8%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (11.2% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 9.7%).
Unemployment Metric | French Canadian | Native/Alaskan |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.9% | Tragic 7.0% |
Males | Excellent 5.1% | Tragic 7.7% |
Females | Exceptional 4.8% | Tragic 6.6% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.2% | Tragic 14.5% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.8% | Tragic 21.5% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Good 10.2% | Tragic 13.0% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.0% | Tragic 9.8% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 5.8% | Tragic 8.2% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Poor 4.8% | Tragic 7.3% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 6.1% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Excellent 4.8% | Tragic 6.0% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Excellent 4.8% | Tragic 5.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.6% | Tragic 6.0% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.4% | Tragic 5.8% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 11.2% | Tragic 10.2% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 8.4% | Tragic 11.5% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 10.3% | Tragic 11.5% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Excellent 5.2% | Tragic 7.2% |
French Canadian vs Native/Alaskan Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.6% compared to 36.6%, a difference of 19.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (78.1% compared to 72.4%, a difference of 7.8%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.2% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.0% compared to 60.6%, a difference of 5.6%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.5% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 6.9%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.3% compared to 78.9%, a difference of 6.9%).
Labor Participation Metric | French Canadian | Native/Alaskan |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 64.0% | Tragic 60.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 79.2% | Tragic 73.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 43.6% | Average 36.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 78.1% | Tragic 72.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 85.2% | Tragic 79.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Good 84.8% | Tragic 79.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Average 84.3% | Tragic 78.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Poor 82.5% | Tragic 77.1% |
French Canadian vs Native/Alaskan Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 34.4%), single mother households (6.0% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 32.8%), and births to unmarried women (34.4% compared to 43.0%, a difference of 24.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.8% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 1.3%), family households (63.7% compared to 66.4%, a difference of 4.2%), and family households with children (26.1% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 8.7%).
Family Structure Metric | French Canadian | Native/Alaskan |
Family Households | Tragic 63.7% | Exceptional 66.4% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.1% | Exceptional 28.4% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 47.5% | Tragic 43.5% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.07 | Exceptional 3.45 |
Single Father Households | Fair 2.4% | Tragic 3.2% |
Single Mother Households | Excellent 6.0% | Tragic 8.0% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 48.0% | Tragic 42.8% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 12.8% | Tragic 13.0% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 34.4% | Tragic 43.0% |
French Canadian vs Native/Alaskan Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 33.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 23.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 10.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 89.8%, a difference of 2.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.9% compared to 57.0%, a difference of 3.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 10.5%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | French Canadian | Native/Alaskan |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.8% | Average 10.5% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.3% | Average 89.8% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 58.9% | Exceptional 57.0% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 20.6% | Exceptional 22.7% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 6.6% | Exceptional 8.2% |
French Canadian vs Native/Alaskan Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 49.7%), master's degree (14.1% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 41.8%), and professional degree (4.0% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 35.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.62%), kindergarten (98.6% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.62%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.63%).
Education Level Metric | French Canadian | Native/Alaskan |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.5% | Tragic 2.2% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.6% | Average 98.0% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.6% | Average 98.0% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Average 97.9% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Average 97.9% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Fair 97.7% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Fair 97.4% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Poor 97.2% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Poor 96.8% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.4% | Tragic 95.6% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 97.2% | Tragic 95.2% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 96.3% | Tragic 93.9% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.3% | Tragic 92.2% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 94.0% | Tragic 90.2% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 92.6% | Tragic 87.7% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 90.9% | Tragic 85.6% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 86.9% | Tragic 80.9% |
College, Under 1 year | Poor 64.2% | Tragic 56.6% |
College, 1 year or more | Poor 57.8% | Tragic 50.2% |
Associate's Degree | Poor 44.9% | Tragic 34.9% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 35.6% | Tragic 26.3% |
Master's Degree | Poor 14.1% | Tragic 9.9% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 4.0% | Tragic 3.0% |
Doctorate Degree | Fair 1.8% | Tragic 1.3% |
French Canadian vs Native/Alaskan Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.3% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 30.5%), disability age 65 to 74 (23.7% compared to 30.4%, a difference of 28.1%), and disability age 35 to 64 (12.9% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 18.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (8.1% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 1.6%), disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 3.4%), and female disability (13.6% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 4.1%).
Disability Metric | French Canadian | Native/Alaskan |
Disability | Tragic 13.4% | Tragic 14.2% |
Males | Tragic 13.3% | Tragic 14.2% |
Females | Tragic 13.6% | Tragic 14.1% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.9% | Tragic 1.9% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.7% | Tragic 6.3% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 8.1% | Tragic 8.2% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 12.9% | Tragic 15.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Fair 23.7% | Tragic 30.4% |
Age | Over 75 years | Good 47.0% | Tragic 53.1% |
Vision | Tragic 2.3% | Tragic 3.0% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.8% | Tragic 4.2% |
Cognitive | Excellent 17.1% | Tragic 18.1% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 6.7% | Tragic 7.5% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Tragic 2.8% |