Czech vs Native/Alaskan Community Comparison

COMPARE

Czech
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Native/Alaskan
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Czechs

Natives/Alaskans

Excellent
Tragic
8,484
SOCIAL INDEX
82.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
70th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
1,140
SOCIAL INDEX
9.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
321st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Native/Alaskan Integration in Czech Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 445,513,951 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Natives/Alaskans within Czech communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.192. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Czechs within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.030% in Natives/Alaskans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Czechs corresponds to an increase of 30.2 Natives/Alaskans.
Czech Integration in Native/Alaskan Communities

Czech vs Native/Alaskan Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Czech and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($44,595 compared to $33,279, a difference of 34.0%), median family income ($105,839 compared to $80,908, a difference of 30.8%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,507 compared to $79,816, a difference of 29.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,421 compared to $47,704, a difference of 7.8%), median female earnings ($38,992 compared to $33,806, a difference of 15.3%), and householder income over 65 years ($61,244 compared to $52,081, a difference of 17.6%).
Czech vs Native/Alaskan Income
Income MetricCzechNative/Alaskan
Per Capita Income
Good
$44,595
Tragic
$33,279
Median Family Income
Excellent
$105,839
Tragic
$80,908
Median Household Income
Good
$86,164
Tragic
$67,879
Median Earnings
Good
$47,221
Tragic
$38,896
Median Male Earnings
Excellent
$56,546
Tragic
$44,775
Median Female Earnings
Poor
$38,992
Tragic
$33,806
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Poor
$51,421
Tragic
$47,704
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Good
$96,525
Tragic
$75,647
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Excellent
$103,507
Tragic
$79,816
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Average
$61,244
Tragic
$52,081
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
29.2%
Exceptional
24.6%

Czech vs Native/Alaskan Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Czech and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.0% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 103.6%), family poverty (7.4% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 92.4%), and receiving food stamps (9.2% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 87.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.4% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 24.5%), single mother poverty (28.9% compared to 36.6%, a difference of 26.8%), and single father poverty (17.0% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 32.0%).
Czech vs Native/Alaskan Poverty
Poverty MetricCzechNative/Alaskan
Poverty
Exceptional
10.8%
Tragic
18.1%
Families
Exceptional
7.4%
Tragic
14.3%
Males
Exceptional
9.8%
Tragic
16.9%
Females
Exceptional
11.9%
Tragic
19.2%
Females 18 to 24 years
Fair
20.4%
Tragic
25.4%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.9%
Tragic
20.3%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
15.5%
Tragic
25.6%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.8%
Tragic
23.8%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.1%
Tragic
24.0%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.2%
Tragic
24.0%
Single Males
Tragic
13.5%
Tragic
19.6%
Single Females
Average
21.0%
Tragic
28.2%
Single Fathers
Tragic
17.0%
Tragic
22.4%
Single Mothers
Good
28.9%
Tragic
36.6%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.0%
Tragic
8.2%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.0%
Tragic
14.2%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
10.5%
Tragic
15.5%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.2%
Tragic
17.3%

Czech vs Native/Alaskan Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Czech and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.1% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 75.0%), male unemployment (4.5% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 70.6%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.0% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 64.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.7% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 5.1%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.0% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 22.0%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 22.8%).
Czech vs Native/Alaskan Unemployment
Unemployment MetricCzechNative/Alaskan
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
7.0%
Males
Exceptional
4.5%
Tragic
7.7%
Females
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
6.6%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.3%
Tragic
14.5%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
15.4%
Tragic
21.5%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.3%
Tragic
13.0%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Tragic
9.8%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
8.2%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.1%
Tragic
7.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.0%
Tragic
6.1%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
6.0%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
5.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
6.0%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
5.8%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.7%
Tragic
10.2%
Women w/ Children < 6
Average
7.6%
Tragic
11.5%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.7%
Tragic
11.5%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
7.2%

Czech vs Native/Alaskan Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Czech and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.6% compared to 36.6%, a difference of 19.4%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.5% compared to 73.9%, a difference of 8.9%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.9% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 8.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.4% compared to 60.6%, a difference of 7.9%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.5% compared to 79.2%, a difference of 8.0%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.6% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 8.1%).
Czech vs Native/Alaskan Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricCzechNative/Alaskan
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Excellent
65.4%
Tragic
60.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.5%
Tragic
73.9%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
43.6%
Average
36.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
78.5%
Tragic
72.4%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.6%
Tragic
79.3%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.5%
Tragic
79.2%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
85.3%
Tragic
78.9%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.9%
Tragic
77.1%

Czech vs Native/Alaskan Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Czech and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.6% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 42.1%), births to unmarried women (30.5% compared to 43.0%, a difference of 40.8%), and single father households (2.3% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 38.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.5% compared to 66.4%, a difference of 2.9%), family households with children (27.5% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 3.1%), and divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 9.0%).
Czech vs Native/Alaskan Family Structure
Family Structure MetricCzechNative/Alaskan
Family Households
Good
64.5%
Exceptional
66.4%
Family Households with Children
Good
27.5%
Exceptional
28.4%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
49.4%
Tragic
43.5%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.11
Exceptional
3.45
Single Father Households
Good
2.3%
Tragic
3.2%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.6%
Tragic
8.0%
Currently Married
Exceptional
49.9%
Tragic
42.8%
Divorced or Separated
Good
11.9%
Tragic
13.0%
Births to Unmarried Women
Excellent
30.5%
Tragic
43.0%

Czech vs Native/Alaskan Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Czech and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (6.9% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 52.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 11.4%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (61.5% compared to 57.0%, a difference of 7.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (22.5% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 1.0%), 1 or more vehicles in household (93.3% compared to 89.8%, a difference of 3.8%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (61.5% compared to 57.0%, a difference of 7.9%).
Czech vs Native/Alaskan Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricCzechNative/Alaskan
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
6.9%
Average
10.5%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
93.3%
Average
89.8%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
61.5%
Exceptional
57.0%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
22.5%
Exceptional
22.7%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.4%
Exceptional
8.2%

Czech vs Native/Alaskan Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Czech and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 50.5%), master's degree (14.7% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 48.3%), and professional degree (4.4% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 48.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.63%), kindergarten (98.6% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.63%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.64%).
Czech vs Native/Alaskan Education Level
Education Level MetricCzechNative/Alaskan
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.5%
Tragic
2.2%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.6%
Average
98.0%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.6%
Average
98.0%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Average
97.9%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Average
97.9%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Fair
97.7%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Fair
97.4%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Poor
97.2%
6th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Poor
96.8%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.4%
Tragic
95.6%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.1%
Tragic
95.2%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.4%
Tragic
93.9%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.5%
Tragic
92.2%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.4%
Tragic
90.2%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
93.2%
Tragic
87.7%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.6%
Tragic
85.6%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.1%
Tragic
80.9%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
67.1%
Tragic
56.6%
College, 1 year or more
Excellent
60.6%
Tragic
50.2%
Associate's Degree
Good
47.2%
Tragic
34.9%
Bachelor's Degree
Average
38.0%
Tragic
26.3%
Master's Degree
Average
14.7%
Tragic
9.9%
Professional Degree
Average
4.4%
Tragic
3.0%
Doctorate Degree
Good
1.9%
Tragic
1.3%

Czech vs Native/Alaskan Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Czech and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.1% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 41.1%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.3% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 35.6%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.4% compared to 30.4%, a difference of 35.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.8% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 9.2%), cognitive disability (16.4% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 10.7%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.2% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 13.3%).
Czech vs Native/Alaskan Disability
Disability MetricCzechNative/Alaskan
Disability
Tragic
12.0%
Tragic
14.2%
Males
Tragic
11.9%
Tragic
14.2%
Females
Good
12.1%
Tragic
14.1%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.5%
Tragic
1.9%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
5.8%
Tragic
6.3%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.2%
Tragic
8.2%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Average
11.3%
Tragic
15.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
22.4%
Tragic
30.4%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
45.7%
Tragic
53.1%
Vision
Excellent
2.1%
Tragic
3.0%
Hearing
Tragic
3.5%
Tragic
4.2%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.4%
Tragic
18.1%
Ambulatory
Excellent
6.0%
Tragic
7.5%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.3%
Tragic
2.8%