Pima vs Native/Alaskan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,399,139 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Natives/Alaskans within Pima communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.637. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pima within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.624% in Natives/Alaskans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Pima corresponds to an increase of 624.0 Natives/Alaskans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Pima and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (21.1% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 16.4%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,821 compared to $75,647, a difference of 9.5%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($73,365 compared to $79,816, a difference of 8.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median earnings ($38,285 compared to $38,896, a difference of 1.6%), householder income over 65 years ($50,539 compared to $52,081, a difference of 3.0%), and median family income ($77,431 compared to $80,908, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Pima and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (23.9% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 54.1%), single father poverty (14.8% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 51.6%), and married-couple family poverty (11.4% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 39.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (20.2% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 2.7%), single mother poverty (38.6% compared to 36.6%, a difference of 5.4%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (27.4% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 7.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Pima and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (18.9% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 64.7%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (11.8% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 62.1%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (11.7% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 61.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (6.4% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 6.4%), male unemployment (8.3% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 7.1%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (23.1% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 7.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Pima and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 36.6%, a difference of 7.2%), in labor force | age 20-64 (69.0% compared to 73.9%, a difference of 7.0%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (74.3% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 6.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (79.0% compared to 79.2%, a difference of 0.16%), in labor force | age 20-24 (69.0% compared to 72.4%, a difference of 5.0%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (74.8% compared to 78.9%, a difference of 5.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Pima and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (4.2% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 30.2%), married-couple households (35.6% compared to 43.5%, a difference of 22.2%), and births to unmarried women (51.5% compared to 43.0%, a difference of 19.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.9% compared to 66.4%, a difference of 0.63%), divorced or separated (12.9% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 1.0%), and single mother households (8.3% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Pima and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 34.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 57.0%, a difference of 9.5%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 4.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 3.2%), 1 or more vehicles in household (86.3% compared to 89.8%, a difference of 4.1%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Pima and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in associate's degree (30.2% compared to 34.9%, a difference of 15.5%), bachelor's degree (23.2% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 13.4%), and professional degree (3.3% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 11.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (93.9% compared to 93.9%, a difference of 0.040%), nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.27%), and kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.27%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Pima and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 83.1%), disability age 65 to 74 (38.6% compared to 30.4%, a difference of 27.0%), and hearing disability (3.7% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 13.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 0.86%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 2.1%), and disability (13.7% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 3.3%).