Immigrants from South America vs Native/Alaskan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 451,028,087 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Natives/Alaskans within Immigrant from South America communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.258. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from South America within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.006% in Natives/Alaskans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from South America corresponds to a decrease of 6.1 Natives/Alaskans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South America and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($44,068 compared to $33,279, a difference of 32.4%), median household income ($85,611 compared to $67,879, a difference of 26.1%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($94,042 compared to $75,647, a difference of 24.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (24.6% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 0.21%), householder income over 65 years ($59,151 compared to $52,081, a difference of 13.6%), and householder income under 25 years ($54,268 compared to $47,704, a difference of 13.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South America and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (12.1% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 62.5%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.3% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 52.1%), and family poverty (9.5% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 50.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (14.4% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 7.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.7% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 11.8%), and single mother poverty (28.5% compared to 36.6%, a difference of 28.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South America and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.7% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 52.9%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.6% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 52.4%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.5% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 48.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.5% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 5.8%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.7% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 6.4%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 12.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South America and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.3% compared to 36.6%, a difference of 9.8%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.0% compared to 60.6%, a difference of 8.9%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.0% compared to 73.9%, a difference of 8.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (73.3% compared to 72.4%, a difference of 1.3%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 6.7%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 79.2%, a difference of 7.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South America and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.3% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 40.7%), births to unmarried women (32.0% compared to 43.0%, a difference of 34.5%), and single mother households (6.7% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 20.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.6% compared to 66.4%, a difference of 1.1%), family households with children (28.0% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 1.3%), and average family size (3.27 compared to 3.45, a difference of 5.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South America and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.2% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 57.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (16.7% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 36.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (50.2% compared to 57.0%, a difference of 13.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.8% compared to 89.8%, a difference of 1.2%), no vehicles in household (11.3% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 7.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (50.2% compared to 57.0%, a difference of 13.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South America and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.6% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 56.8%), master's degree (15.5% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 55.8%), and bachelor's degree (38.6% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 46.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (93.8% compared to 93.9%, a difference of 0.14%), 4th grade (97.0% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.40%), and 10th grade (92.6% compared to 92.2%, a difference of 0.40%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South America and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 59.2%), hearing disability (2.7% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 58.2%), and disability age 35 to 64 (9.9% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 54.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 8.4%), disability age over 75 (46.7% compared to 53.1%, a difference of 13.6%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 16.6%).