Ecuadorian vs Native/Alaskan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 304,238,002 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Natives/Alaskans within Ecuadorian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.044. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ecuadorians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.003% in Natives/Alaskans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ecuadorians corresponds to an increase of 2.5 Natives/Alaskans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($41,958 compared to $33,279, a difference of 26.1%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($91,574 compared to $75,647, a difference of 21.0%), and median household income ($82,070 compared to $67,879, a difference of 20.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($54,958 compared to $52,081, a difference of 5.5%), wage/income gap (22.9% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 7.2%), and householder income under 25 years ($53,911 compared to $47,704, a difference of 13.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (12.5% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 57.0%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.3% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 41.4%), and single father poverty (16.5% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 35.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.7% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 1.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.0% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 1.7%), and receiving food stamps (14.9% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 16.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.9% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 45.7%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.4% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 34.5%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.4% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 33.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.8% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 1.7%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 3.0%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.4% compared to 36.6%, a difference of 16.4%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 60.6%, a difference of 8.4%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.4% compared to 73.9%, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (72.4% compared to 72.4%, a difference of 0.010%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 6.5%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.4% compared to 79.2%, a difference of 6.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 34.4%), births to unmarried women (33.3% compared to 43.0%, a difference of 29.2%), and single mother households (7.2% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 11.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (43.5% compared to 43.5%, a difference of 0.050%), currently married (43.6% compared to 42.8%, a difference of 1.8%), and family households (65.0% compared to 66.4%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (22.8% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 116.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.5% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 83.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 61.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (77.9% compared to 89.8%, a difference of 15.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (42.0% compared to 57.0%, a difference of 35.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 61.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (14.0% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 40.9%), bachelor's degree (35.4% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 34.4%), and professional degree (3.9% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 32.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (88.0% compared to 87.7%, a difference of 0.43%), high school diploma (85.1% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 0.54%), and 11th grade (89.6% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 0.66%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 77.7%), hearing disability (2.5% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 67.3%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.7% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 43.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 5.3%), self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 9.8%), and disability age over 75 (47.4% compared to 53.1%, a difference of 12.0%).