Blackfeet vs Native/Alaskan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 298,128,105 people shows a near-perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Natives/Alaskans within Blackfeet communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.910. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Blackfeet within a typical geography, there is an increase of 1.022% in Natives/Alaskans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Blackfeet corresponds to an increase of 1,021.5 Natives/Alaskans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Blackfeet and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($37,695 compared to $33,279, a difference of 13.3%), median family income ($88,717 compared to $80,908, a difference of 9.7%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($86,595 compared to $79,816, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($48,603 compared to $47,704, a difference of 1.9%), wage/income gap (25.2% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 2.7%), and householder income over 65 years ($54,029 compared to $52,081, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Blackfeet and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (6.2% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 32.8%), family poverty (11.3% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 26.7%), and single male poverty (15.5% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 26.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (23.6% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 7.6%), single mother poverty (33.2% compared to 36.6%, a difference of 10.3%), and single female poverty (25.1% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 12.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Blackfeet and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.3% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 35.9%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.7% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 32.7%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.3% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 31.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (12.0% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 8.6%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (13.3% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 8.7%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 9.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Blackfeet and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.9% compared to 36.6%, a difference of 6.5%), in labor force | age 30-34 (82.8% compared to 79.2%, a difference of 4.6%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.2% compared to 60.6%, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (80.0% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 3.7%), in labor force | age 35-44 (81.9% compared to 78.9%, a difference of 3.8%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.0% compared to 73.9%, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Blackfeet and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.7% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 18.7%), births to unmarried women (37.9% compared to 43.0%, a difference of 13.4%), and single mother households (7.5% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 7.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (43.8% compared to 43.5%, a difference of 0.74%), divorced or separated (13.3% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 2.1%), and currently married (44.2% compared to 42.8%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Blackfeet and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 16.8%), no vehicles in household (9.6% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 9.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.9% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 8.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.6% compared to 89.8%, a difference of 0.83%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.4% compared to 57.0%, a difference of 1.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.9% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 8.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Blackfeet and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (12.1% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 21.7%), bachelor's degree (31.5% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 19.6%), and professional degree (3.5% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 17.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.1% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.15%), kindergarten (98.1% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.15%), and 1st grade (98.1% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.15%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Blackfeet and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 18.1%), hearing disability (3.6% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 16.0%), and disability age 65 to 74 (26.6% compared to 30.4%, a difference of 14.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.3% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 0.65%), disability age 18 to 34 (8.1% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 1.1%), and female disability (13.8% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 2.2%).