Immigrants from El Salvador vs Native/Alaskan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 344,537,583 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Natives/Alaskans within Immigrant from El Salvador communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.098. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from El Salvador within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.007% in Natives/Alaskans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from El Salvador corresponds to a decrease of 6.8 Natives/Alaskans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from El Salvador and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($81,213 compared to $67,879, a difference of 19.6%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($93,176 compared to $79,816, a difference of 16.7%), and per capita income ($38,394 compared to $33,279, a difference of 15.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($47,973 compared to $44,775, a difference of 7.1%), wage/income gap (22.8% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 7.8%), and median female earnings ($36,673 compared to $33,806, a difference of 8.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from El Salvador and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (12.6% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 56.1%), single father poverty (15.0% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 49.5%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (15.0% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 35.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (14.5% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 7.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (13.1% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 8.4%), and single mother poverty (31.2% compared to 36.6%, a difference of 17.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from El Salvador and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.1% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 42.2%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.0% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 40.7%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.2% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 39.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 1.7%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.9% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 2.5%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.4% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 5.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from El Salvador and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (66.8% compared to 60.6%, a difference of 10.3%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.4% compared to 73.9%, a difference of 7.5%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (34.3% compared to 36.6%, a difference of 6.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.3% compared to 72.4%, a difference of 4.0%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.7% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 5.7%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.5% compared to 78.9%, a difference of 5.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from El Salvador and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (36.4% compared to 43.0%, a difference of 18.0%), divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 11.6%), and single father households (2.9% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 8.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (43.1% compared to 42.8%, a difference of 0.82%), family households (67.0% compared to 66.4%, a difference of 0.97%), and average family size (3.49 compared to 3.45, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from El Salvador and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 6.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 5.7%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.6% compared to 57.0%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.6% compared to 89.8%, a difference of 0.24%), no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 0.73%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.6% compared to 57.0%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from El Salvador and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.9% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 72.7%), master's degree (12.0% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 20.8%), and bachelor's degree (31.3% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 18.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, under 1 year (56.4% compared to 56.6%, a difference of 0.44%), college, 1 year or more (51.0% compared to 50.2%, a difference of 1.6%), and nursery school (96.2% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from El Salvador and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 78.5%), hearing disability (2.6% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 62.7%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.7% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 43.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 3.1%), disability age over 75 (49.0% compared to 53.1%, a difference of 8.2%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 12.8%).