Swiss vs Native/Alaskan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 428,080,037 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Natives/Alaskans within Swiss communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.448. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Swiss within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.085% in Natives/Alaskans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Swiss corresponds to an increase of 85.1 Natives/Alaskans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Swiss and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($44,076 compared to $33,279, a difference of 32.4%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,071 compared to $79,816, a difference of 29.1%), and median family income ($104,396 compared to $80,908, a difference of 29.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,493 compared to $47,704, a difference of 7.9%), median female earnings ($37,904 compared to $33,806, a difference of 12.1%), and householder income over 65 years ($61,621 compared to $52,081, a difference of 18.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Swiss and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 91.1%), family poverty (7.7% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 84.8%), and receiving food stamps (9.7% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 78.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (29.7% compared to 36.6%, a difference of 23.3%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.2% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 26.1%), and single father poverty (17.3% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 29.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Swiss and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 66.5%), male unemployment (4.7% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 63.9%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 55.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.5% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 7.0%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 17.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 19.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Swiss and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.3% compared to 36.6%, a difference of 18.4%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.4% compared to 73.9%, a difference of 7.5%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.8% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 7.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.4% compared to 60.6%, a difference of 6.3%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.3% compared to 79.2%, a difference of 6.5%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 78.9%, a difference of 6.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Swiss and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.6% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 42.5%), births to unmarried women (30.5% compared to 43.0%, a difference of 41.0%), and single father households (2.3% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 39.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.2% compared to 66.4%, a difference of 1.7%), family households with children (27.7% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 2.6%), and divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 8.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Swiss and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 33.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.0% compared to 57.0%, a difference of 7.0%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 5.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 1.1%), 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 89.8%, a difference of 2.8%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 5.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Swiss and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.5% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 51.5%), doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 49.0%), and master's degree (14.7% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 48.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.60%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.60%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.61%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Swiss and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.2% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 37.5%), disability age 65 to 74 (22.9% compared to 30.4%, a difference of 32.9%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.6% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 31.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.8% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 8.7%), cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 8.7%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.4% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 11.3%).