Hispanic or Latino vs Native/Alaskan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 507,055,382 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Natives/Alaskans within Hispanic or Latino communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.146. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Hispanics or Latinos within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.002% in Natives/Alaskans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Hispanics or Latinos corresponds to an increase of 1.8 Natives/Alaskans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Hispanic or Latino and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($73,823 compared to $67,879, a difference of 8.8%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($86,006 compared to $79,816, a difference of 7.8%), and per capita income ($35,688 compared to $33,279, a difference of 7.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (24.9% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 1.2%), householder income over 65 years ($52,832 compared to $52,081, a difference of 1.4%), and median female earnings ($34,421 compared to $33,806, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Hispanic or Latino and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (14.2% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 38.1%), single father poverty (16.8% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 33.4%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.5% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 24.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.3% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 0.54%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.8% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 1.8%), and receiving food stamps (15.8% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 9.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Hispanic or Latino and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (5.8% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 33.0%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.5% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 32.2%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.4% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 28.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.9% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 3.2%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 3.5%), and female unemployment (6.2% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 6.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Hispanic or Latino and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (64.3% compared to 60.6%, a difference of 6.1%), in labor force | age 16-19 (34.5% compared to 36.6%, a difference of 5.9%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.6% compared to 73.9%, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.4% compared to 72.4%, a difference of 2.7%), in labor force | age 25-29 (82.2% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 3.7%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (80.1% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Hispanic or Latino and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (37.8% compared to 43.0%, a difference of 13.8%), single father households (2.8% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 13.7%), and family households with children (29.9% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.41 compared to 3.45, a difference of 1.3%), single mother households (7.9% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 1.4%), and family households (67.4% compared to 66.4%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Hispanic or Latino and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.1% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 15.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 7.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.9% compared to 57.0%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 89.8%, a difference of 1.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.9% compared to 57.0%, a difference of 1.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.4% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Hispanic or Latino and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 35.2%), bachelor's degree (29.6% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 12.4%), and master's degree (10.9% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 10.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, under 1 year (57.0% compared to 56.6%, a difference of 0.64%), doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 0.70%), and nursery school (97.0% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Hispanic or Latino and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 48.3%), hearing disability (3.1% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 34.7%), and disability age 35 to 64 (12.3% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 24.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.9% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 1.3%), self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 4.3%), and disability age over 75 (50.6% compared to 53.1%, a difference of 4.9%).